Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a Job-Specific FCE Protocol: The Work Demands of Hospital Nurses as an Example

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders often result in employee disability leaves and sickness-related absenteeism in the workplace. Professional evaluations of an employee's capacity to work require additional support by means of Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) methods. However, most FCE methods assess general physical capacity and, because of fixed test procedures, testing times range between 4 and 6 h for up to several days. For return to work (vocational rehabilitation), the tests need to reflect the employees' specific work demands more precisely. This study aims to develop a job-specific FCE protocol on the ErgosTM Work Simulator for hospital nurses. In developing the contents of this specific protocol, hierarchical task analyses were performed with 20 nurses in four departments of a university medical center. A job-specific test protocol was developed that consisted of five steps. In this process, the original test protocol was analyzed first. Secondly, categorization of physical risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders revealed 16 possible combinations of activity, posture, and load. Finally, duration and frequencies during one working day of these combinations were coupled to the Ergos test panels. The nurse-specific test protocol lasts 90 min. It was possible to develop a job-specific protocol, using on-site observations as the input. Compared to the original Ergos protocol, the external validity of the new job-specific protocol has improved: it simulates the functional capacity that nurses need to perform their job in a realistic way. The testing time of the original Ergos protocol is four times longer compared to the new job-specific protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koukoulaki,T. MSD in Europe. TUTB Newsletter, 2000, p. 14.

  2. Reneman,MF, Joling,CI, Soer,EL, Göeken,LNH. Functional capacity Evaluation: Ecological validity of three static endurance tests. Work 2001; 16: 227-234.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tramposh,AK. The functional capacity evaluation: Measuring maximal work abilities. Occup Med: State Art Rev 1992; 7(1): 113-124.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee,GKL, Chan,CCH, Hui-Chan,CWY. Consistency of performance on the functional capacity assessment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 80: 189-195.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smedley,J, Egger,P, Cooper,C, Coggon,D. Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses. Occup Environ Med 1995; 52: 160-163.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Josephson,M, Lagerstrom,M, Hagberg,M, Wigaes Hjelm,E. Musculoskeletal symptoms and job strain among nursing personnel: A study over a three year period. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54: 681-685.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smedley,J, Inskip,H, Cooper,C, Coggon,D. Natural history of low back pain. A longitudinal study in nurses. Spine 1998; 23: 2422-2426.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. Longitudinal study of work and health in hospital and surgical nurses (in Dutch). Amsterdam: Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, Academic Medical Center, 2002, Report No 02-11.

  9. Ergos test manual. Eindhoven: Work Recovery Inc., 1991.

  10. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. Directory of occupational titles, 4th edn. Washington, DC: ETA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fishbain,DA, Abdel-Moty,E, Cutler,RB, Khalil,TM, Sadek,S, Steele-Rosomoff,R, Rosomoff,HL. Measuring residual functioning capacity in chronic low back pain patients based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Spine 1994; 19: 872-880.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fishbain,DA, Cutler,RB, Rosomoff,HL, Khalil,TM, Abdel-Moty,E, Steele-Rosomoff,R. Validity of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles residual functional capacity battery. Clini J Pain 1999; 15: 102-110.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dusik,LA, Menard,MR, Cooke,C, Fairburn,SM, Beach,GN. Concurrent validity of the Ergos Work Simulator versus conventional functional capacity evaluation techniques in a workers' compensation population. JOM 1993; 35: 759-767.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoozemans,MJM, Burdorf,A, Van der Beek,AJ, Frings-Dresen,MHW, Mathiassen,SE. Group-based measurement strategies in exposure assessments explored by bootstrapping. Scand J Work Environ Health 2001; 27: 125-132.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frings-Dresen,MHW, Kuijer,PPFM. The TRAC-system: An observation method for analysing work demands at the workplace. Saf Sci 1995; 21: 163-165.

    Google Scholar 

  16. van der Beek,AJ, Van Gaalen,LC, Frings-Dresen,MHW. Working postures and activities of lorry drivers: A reliability study of on-site observations and recording on a pocket-computer. Appl Ergon 1992; 23: 331-336.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bernard,BP, ed. Musculoskeletal disorders and work place factors: A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity and low back. Cincinnati, OH:National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, July 1997, Report No. 97-141.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sluiter,JK, Rest,KM, Frings-Dresen,MHW. Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health2001; 27 (Suppl 1): 1-102.

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ergonomics:Evaluation of working postures. Geneva: ISO, 1999. ICS 13.180, ISO/DIS 11226 (TC 159).

  20. Sluiter,JK, Van der Beek,AJ, Frings-Dresen,MHW. Reactivity and recovery from different types of work measured by catecholamines and cortisol: A systematic literature review. Occup Environ Med 2000; 57: 298-315.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rohmert,W. Problems in determining rest allowances. Part I: Use of modern methods to evaluate stress and strain in static muscular work. Appl Ergon 1973; 4: 91-95.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wyman,DO. Evaluating patients for return to work. Am Fam Phys 1999; 59(4): 844-848.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reneman,MF, Jaegers,SMHJ, Westmaas,M, Göeken,LNH. The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 2002; 18: 23-27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frings-Dresen, M.H.W., Sluiter, J.K. Development of a Job-Specific FCE Protocol: The Work Demands of Hospital Nurses as an Example. J Occup Rehabil 13, 233–248 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026268620904

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026268620904

Navigation