Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching Spelling of Social Studies Content Vocabulary Prior to Using the Vocabulary in Inclusive Learning Environments: An Examination of Constant Time Delay, Observational Learning, and Instructive Feedback

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of using a 5 s constant time delay (CTD) procedure to teach the written spelling of social studies vocabulary words taken from the general education social studies content to students with mild disabilities. Subjects were 3 elementary students with mild disabilities. Instruction was delivered in a small group setting. Vocabulary words were different for each student, which allowed for observational learning by the other students in the group. Assessments of observational learning were conducted when each student attempted to spell their group-mate's words. Related instructive feedback (meaningful sentences containing the social studies vocabulary words) was presented in the consequent event of instructional trials. A multiple probe design across word sets was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of the procedure. Results indicated that (a) CTD was reliably implemented and all students acquired the spelling of their own sets of 12 social studies vocabulary words with 100% accuracy and maintained this accuracy over time, (b) all students generalized their target spellings across settings and instructors, and (c) some observational and instructive feedback learning occurred for all students. Additionally, long-term maintenance of observational spellings decreased over time, and minor fluctuations in long-term maintenance of instructive feedback occurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cybriwsky, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (1990). Using constant time delay procedures to teach multiplication facts. Remedial and Special Education, 11(1), 54-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, B. M., & Stormont-Sturgin, M. (1995). Spelling interventions for students with disabilities: A review. Journal of Special Education, 28, 488-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Baklarz, J. L. (1991). Acquisition of incidental information during small group instruction. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., Morris, L. L., Doyle, P. M., & Meyer, S. (1990). Teaching sight word reading in a small group instructional arrangement using constant time delay. Exceptionality, 1, 81-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heward, W. L. (2000). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education. (6th ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keel, M. C., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Small-group instruction for students with learning disabilities: Observational and incidental learning. Exceptional Children, 58, 357-368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koscinski, S. T., & Gast, D. L. (1993). Using constant time delay to teach students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 533-544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, J. C., & Bott, D. A. (1990). Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning problems. Exceptional Children, 56, 438-449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. D. & Mercer, A. R. (2001). Teaching Students with Learning Problems. (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. J., & Bryan, A. J. (1980). Multiple-baseline and multiple-probe designs. Practical alternatives for special education assessment and evaluation. Journal of Special Education, 14, 325-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. W., Stevens, K. B., & Doak, P. K. (1990). Using constant time delay to teach word definitions. Journal of Special Education, 24, 306-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Search Enhanced Regulations from the Federal Register formatted by the Education Development Center,Inc. for the IDEA Practices Website. (n.d.) Subpart C-Services, Individualized Education Programs.Retrieved November 27, 2001 from http://www.ideapractices.org/searchregs/300subpartC/Csec300.347.htm

  • Stevens, K. B., Blackhurst, A. E. & Bptt-Slaton, D. (1991). Teaching memorized spelling with a microcomputer: Time delay and computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 153-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K. B., & Schuster, J. W. (1987). Effects of constant time delay procedure on the written spelling performance of a learning disabled student. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(1), 9-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K. B., & Schuster, J. W. (1988). Time delay: Systematic instruction for academic tasks. Remedial and Special Education, 9(5), 16-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telecsan, B. L., Slaton, D. B., & Stevens, K. B. (1999). Peer tutoring: Teaching students with learning disabilities to deliver time delay instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 133-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touchette, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States. (2001). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-III. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler individual achievement test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Gast, D. l. (1995). Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., Doyle, P. M., & Mills, B. M. (1990). Use of choral and individual responses with constant time delay when teaching sight word reading. Remedial and Special Education, 11(5), 47-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Cybriwsky, C. A., Gast, D. L., & Boyle-Gast, K. (1991). Using constant time delay and attentional responses with adolescents. Exceptional Children, 57, 462-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Cybriwsky, C., Doyle, P. M., Schuster, J. W., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 239-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989, 1990). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-revised. Allen, TX: DLM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kay B. Stevens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ross, A.H., Stevens, K.B. Teaching Spelling of Social Studies Content Vocabulary Prior to Using the Vocabulary in Inclusive Learning Environments: An Examination of Constant Time Delay, Observational Learning, and Instructive Feedback. Journal of Behavioral Education 12, 287–309 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025917824403

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025917824403

Navigation