Skip to main content
Log in

EDITORIAL: Nonresponse research – an underdeveloped field in epidemiology

European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Armstrong BK, White E, Saracci R. Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Vol. 21. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gail MH, Benichou J (eds), Encyclopedia of Epidemiologic Methods, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rothman KJ, Greendland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Last JM. A Dictionary of Epidemiology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aadahl M, Jørgensen T. The effect of conducting a lottery on questionnaire response rates: A randomised trial. Eur J Epidemiol 2003; 18: 941–944.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Siemiatycki J, Campbell S. Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 120: 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Austin MA, Criqui MH, Barret-Connor E, Holdbrook MJ. The effect of response bias on the odds ratio. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 114: 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stang A, Jöckel KH. Low response rate studies may be less biased than high response rate studies. Am J Epidemiol, in press.

  9. Slattery ML, Edwards SL, Caan BJ, Kerber RA, Potter JD. Response rates among control subjects in case-control studies. Ann Epidemiol 1995; 5: 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stang A, Ahrens W, Jöckel KH. Control response proportions in population-based case-control studies in Germany. Epidemiology 1999; 10: 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Olson SH, Voigt LF, Begg CB, Weiss NS. Reporting participation in case-control studies. Epidemiology 2002; 13: 123–126.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sandler DP. On revealing what we'd rather hide: The problem of describing study participation (editorial). Epidemiology 2002; 13: 117.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richardi L, Boffetta P, Merletti F. Analysis of nonresponse bias in a population-based case-control study on lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 1033–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thefeld W, Stolzenberg H, Bellach BM. Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey: Response, Zusammensetzung der Teilnehmer und Non-Responder-Analyse. Gesundheitswesen 1999; 61: S57–S61.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cochran WG. Modern methods in the sampling of human populations. Am J Publ Health 1951; 41: 647–653.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stang, A. EDITORIAL: Nonresponse research – an underdeveloped field in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 18, 929–932 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025877501423

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025877501423

Navigation