Skip to main content
Log in

Is the Addiction Severity Index a Reliable and Valid Assessment Instrument Among Clients with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness and Substance Abuse Disorders?

  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: This study examined aspects of reliability, validity and utility of Addiction Severity Index (ASI) data as administered to clients with severe and persistent mental illness (SMI) and concurrent substance abuse disorders enrolled in a publicly-funded community mental health center. Methods: A total of 62 clients with SMI volunteered to participate in an interobserver and test-retest reliability study of the ASI. Spearman-Brown and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the extent of agreement among client responses. Results: Overall 16% of the composite scores could not be calculated due to missing data and 31% of the clients misunderstood or confused items in at least one of the seven ASI domains. As a whole, the interobserver reliability of the ASI composite scores for those subjects where sufficient data were available was satisfactory. However, there was more variance in the stability of client responses, with four composite scores producing test-retest reliability coefficients below .65. Conclusion: Evidence from this study suggests that the ASI has a number of limitations in assessing the problems of clients with severe and persistent mental illness, and it is likely that other similar instruments based on the self-reports of persons with severe and persistent mental illness would also encounter these limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alterman, A.I., Brown, L., Zaballero, A., & McKay, J.R. (1994). The interviewer severity ratings and composite scores of the ASI: A further look. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 34, 201-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argeriou, M., McCarty, D., Mulvey, K., & Daley, M. (1994). Use of the Addiction Severity Index with Homeless Substance Abusers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11, 359-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartko, J.J., & Carpenter, W.T. (1976). On the methods and theory of reliability. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 163, 307-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corse, S.J., Herschinger, N.B., & Zanis, D.A. (1995). The use of the ASI with persons with severe mental illness: Face validity. Psychosocial Rehabilitation.

  • Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fureman, I., McLellan, A.T., & Alterman, A. (1994). Training for and maintaining interviewer consistency with the ASI. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11, 233-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, R.E., Alterman, A.I., Rosenberg, S.R. (1993). Detection of substance use disorders in severely mentally ill patients. Community Mental Health Journal, 29, 175-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D.C., & El-Guebaly, N. (1992). More data on the addiction severity index: Reliability and validity with the mentally ill substance abuser. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 180, 197-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosten, T.R., Rounsaville, B.J., & Kleber, H.D. (1983). Concurrent validity of the addiction severity index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 171, 606-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGahan, P., Griffith, J., & McLellan, A.T. (1984). Composite Scores from the Addiction Severity Index: Manual and computer software. Veterans Administration Press, PVAMC, Phila. PA 19104.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, A.T., Luborsky, L., Woody, G.E., & O'Brien, C.P. (1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The addiction severity index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 168, 26-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, A.T., Luborsky, L., Cacciola, J., Griffith, J., Evans, F., Barr, H.L., & O'Brien, C.P. (1985). New data from the addiction severity index: Reliability and validity in three centers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 173, 412-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, A.T., Cacciola, J., Kushner, H., Peters, R., Smith, I., & Pettinati, H. (1992). The fifth edition of the addiction severity index: Historical critique and normative data. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 199-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B., Gibbon, M., & First, M.B. (1992). The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). 1: History, rationale, and description. Archieves of General Psychiatry, 49, 624-629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woody, G.E., McLellan, A.T., Luborsky, L., & O'Brien, C.P. (1985). Sociopathy and psychotherapy outcome. Archieves of General Psychiatry, 42, 1081-1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woody, G.E., Luborsky, L., McLellan, A.T., & O'Brien, C.P. (1983). Psychotherapy for opiate addicts: Does it help? Archieves of. General. Psychiatry, 40, 639-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanis, D.A., McLellan, A.T., Cnaan, R., & Randall, M. (1994). Reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index in a homeless sample. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11, 541-548.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zanis, D.A., McLellan, A.T. & Corse, S. Is the Addiction Severity Index a Reliable and Valid Assessment Instrument Among Clients with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness and Substance Abuse Disorders?. Community Ment Health J 33, 213–227 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025085310814

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025085310814

Keywords

Navigation