Skip to main content
Log in

How Effective Are the Things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech Act

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (Blum-Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989a) has identified five components of an “apology speech act set”: five strategies that speakers use to apologize. This study examines the effects of four of those strategies (illocutionary force indicating device, expression of responsibility, promise of forebearance, and offer of repair) on the judgments made by hearers about the speaker and about the apology. Each of the strategies is shown to have an independent effect in improving reactions to the speaker. Further, the magnitude of these effects appear to be roughly similar for each of the strategies. The things people say to apologize do seem to be effective in accomplishing the self-presentational goals of apologizers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnlund, D. C., & Yoshioka, M. (1990). Apologies: Japanese and American styles. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 14, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989a). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (Advances in discourse processes, 31, R. O. Freedle, Ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989b). Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 1–34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5, 196–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56–310). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1977). Computational handbook of statistics (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1981). Developing a measure of sociocultural competence: The case of apology. Language Learning, 31, 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Children's reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 742–753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1989). Children's reactions to transgressions: Effects of the actor's apology, reputation and remorse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1981). On apologising. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givens, K. K., Mills, C. M., Smith, C. E., & Stack, A. D. (1994, May). Can an apology overcome the fundamental attribution error? Paper presented at the Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

  • Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R., & Thomas, T. (1989). Predicting impressions created by combinations of emotion and social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10, 194–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology (3rd ed.). Belmont, California: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazowski, L. E. (1987). Speakers' nonverbal expressions of emotion as moderators of listeners' reactions to disclosures of self harm and social harm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manstead, A. S. R., & Semin, G. R. (1981). Social transgressions, social perspectives, and social emotionality. Motivation and Emotion, 5, 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshtain, E. (1983). Sociocultural competence and language transfer. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. D. (1983). Apology: A speech act set. In N. Wolfson & E. Judd (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 18–35). Rawley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, S. J. (1989). The effects of apologies and apology structure on social perception and social action. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M. (1988). [Preliminary investigations of the effects of apologies]. Unpublished raw data.

  • Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M. (1990). Contents of apologies and excuses. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Scher, S. J., Darley, J. M., & Lynn, K. K. (1996). Effects of apologies on identity, blame, and sanctions. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Scher, S. J., & Huff, C. W. (1991, May). Apologies and causes of transgressions: Further examination of the role of identity in the remedial process. Paper presented at the meetings of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

  • Schlenker, B. R., & Darby, B. W. (1981). The use of apologies in social predicaments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 22, 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1981). The beholder beheld: A study of social emotionality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semin, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1982). The social implications of embarrassment displays and restitution behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., Higgins, R. L., & Stucky, R. J. (1983). Excuses: Masquerades in search of grace. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trillan, C. (1984). Killings. New York: Tickner & Fields.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trosberg, A. (1987). Apology strategies in natives/non-natives. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scher, S.J., Darley, J.M. How Effective Are the Things People Say to Apologize? Effects of the Realization of the Apology Speech Act. J Psycholinguist Res 26, 127–140 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025068306386

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025068306386

Keywords

Navigation