Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reflections on the Researcher-Researched Relationship: A Woman Interviewing Men

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The enactment of gender in interviews with the men in my recent study of divorced fathers is the focus of this paper. Neither the role of gender in the qualitative research process nor its influence on research products has been given much descriptive or analytical attention, especially with respect to studies of men by women. While contextually situated, the relationships which evolve during the research process are influenced by the identities and histories of those involved, including those of gender. Such questions about the researcher-researched relationship and interactional dynamics which emerge during interviewing are ones of reflexivity. This paper, then, retrospectively examines men's assertions of gender identities and the gender hierarchy during interviews with me, and suggests that the negotiation of gender in research warrants much more attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arendell, T. (1997). Best case scenarios. In K. Hansen & A. Garey (Eds.), Family values, kinship, and sexual politics in the U.S.: Critical feminist perspectives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendell, T. (1995). Fathers and divorce. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendell, T. (1992a). Father absence: Investigations into divorce. Gender & Society, 6(4), 562–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendell, T. (1992b). Social self as gendered: A masculinist discourse of divorce. Symbolic Interaction, 5(2), 151–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendell, T. (1986). Mothers and divorce: Legal, economic, and social dilemmas. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendell, T. (In Progress). Gender and emotional management in the field: A case study using in-depth interviews.

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brod, H. (1988). Introduction: Themes and theses of men's studies. In H. Brod (Ed.), The making of masculinities (pp. 1–17). Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. (1988). Conversations with a purpose: The ethnographic interview in educational research. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, 1, 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, H. (1992). Ethnography and experience: Gender implication in field work and texts. In J. Okely & H. Callaway (Eds.), Anthropology and autobiography (pp. 29–49). New York: Rutledge, Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capraro, Rocco. (1993). Personal correspondence. New York.

  • Chester, P. (1991). Mothers on trial: The battle for children and custody. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., & Fonow, M. (1990). Knowledge and women's interest: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. In J. McCarl Nielsen (Ed.), Feminist research methods: Exemplary readings in the social sciences (pp. 58–68). San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, P., & Letherby, G. (1993). Weaving stories: Personal auto/biographies in feminist research. Sociology, 27(1), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1992). The fit between qualitative research and characteristics of families. In J. Gilgun, K. Daly, & G. Handel (Eds.), Qualitative methods in family research (pp. 1–14). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, A. K. (1967). The low-caste stranger in social research. In G. Sjoberg (Ed.), Ethics, politics, and social research (pp. 267–296). Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1949). The second sex. Translated by H. Parshley. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) (1994a). Handbook of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.) (1994b). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Devault, M. (1990). Talking and listening from women's standpoint: Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems, 37(1), 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, M. with Anzul, M., Friedman, T., Garner, D., & McCormack Steinmetz, A. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. (Ed.). (1988). Contemporary field research: A collection of readings. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. 1990. Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, P. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, J. (1989). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In M. Maslon, J. O'Barr, S. Westphal-Wihl, & M. Wyer (Eds.), Feminist theory in practice and process (pp. 51–74). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361–376). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, J. and K. Peiss. (1985). Boundaries, negotiation, consciousness: Reconceptualizing gender relations. Social Problems 32(4), 317–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. (1970). The coming crisis of western society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, F., Pollack, W., & Golding, E. (1988). Fathers and children: Predicting the quality and quantity of fathering. Developmental Psychology, 24, 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J. (1992). Out of control: Family therapy and domestic disorder. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, J. N. (1985). Not one of the guys: The female researcher in a male-dominated setting. Qualitative Sociology, 8(1), 42–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, & nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R. (1997). Reflexivity and voice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R. (Ed.) (1996). Special methods issue: Ethics, reflexivity, and voice. Qualitative Sociology, 19(1).

  • Hertz, R. (1995). Separate but simultaneous interviewing of husbands and wives: Making sense of their stories. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(4), 429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. (1984). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, S., & Copp, M. (1993). Emotions and fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, S. (1985). Beyond “subjectivity”: The use of the self in social science. Qualitative Sociology, 8(4), 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, D., & Arendell, T. (In Progress). Divorce, violence, and gender.

  • LaRossa, R., & LaRossa, M. (1989). Baby care: Fathers vs. mothers. In B. Risman & P. Schwartz (Eds.), Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, L., & Strikwerda, R. (1992). Fatherhood and nurturance. In L. May & R. Strikwerda (Eds.), Rethinking masculinity: Philosophical explorations in light of feminism (pp. 75–92). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, L., & O'Brien, M. (1983). Interviewing men: Taking gender seriously. In E. Garmarknikow, D. Morgan, J. Purvis, & D. Taylorson, (Eds.), The public and the private (pp. 147–159). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. (1986). The analysis of interview-narratives. In T. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 233–255). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naples, N. (1996). A feminist rethinking of the insider/outsider debate: The ‘outsider phenomenon’ in rural Iowa. Qualitative Sociology. 19(1), 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 335–358). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander, S. (1995). Surely you're not in this just to be helpful: Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. In R. Hertz & J. Imber (Eds.), Studying elites using qualitative methods (pp. 113–150). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. (1995). Reflections on fieldwork in a complex organization: Lawyers, ethnographic authority, and lethal weapons. In R. Hertz & J. Imber (Eds.), Studying elites using qualitative methods (pp. 94–110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. with Davidman, L. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1993). Neglected voices and excessive demands in feminist research. Qualitative Sociology, 16(1), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. (1987). When gender is not enough. Gender & Society, 1(2), 172–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar, A., and Gubrium, J. (1994). Introduction. In J. Gubrium and A. Sankar (Eds.), Qualitative methods in aging research (pp. vii–xvii). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J. (1991). Relationships between fathers and children who live apart: The father's role after separation. Journal of Marriage and the Family 53, 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J., & Bianchi, S. (1988). Children's contact with absent parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 663–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A. (1993). Pickle Fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 83–109). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel, K. Wolf (Ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1984). Researching prostitution: Some problems for feminist research. Humanity & Society, 8, 407–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of grounded theory: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sway, M. (1981). Simmel's concept of the stranger and the gypsies. The Social Science Journal, 18(1), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedje, L., & Darling-Fisher, C. (1993). Factors that influence father's participation in child care. Health Care for Women International, 14, 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the geld: On writing ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. (1988). Gender issues in field research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserfall, R. (1993). Reflexivity, feminism, and difference. Qualitative Sociology, 16(1), 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., & Heikes, E. (1993). The importance of researcher's gender in the in-depth interview: Evidence from two case studies of male nurses. Gender & Society, 7(2), 280–291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Colby College, Waterville, Maine, 04901

    Terry Arendell

Authors
  1. Terry Arendell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arendell, T. Reflections on the Researcher-Researched Relationship: A Woman Interviewing Men. Qualitative Sociology 20, 341–368 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024727316052

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024727316052

Search

Navigation