Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discriminating Among Subgroups of Borderline Personality Disorder: An Assessment of Object Representations

  • Published:
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Aims and scope

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify subgroups of borderline personality disorder (BPD) by examining internalized object relations. It was predicted: (a) that the internalized object relations of borderline patients as a group can be differentiated from psychiatric patients (comparison group N = 15), and (b) that BPD subgroups significantly differ in their object-relational profiles. Fifty-seven adult borderline subjects (28 male and 29 female) were separated into three groups based on Horney's description of interpersonal styles (moving away, against, and toward). Object relations were assessed using the Bell Object Relations Inventory and from early memories. Four written early memories were scored using the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS). The results suggest that the malevolent inner object world of borderline patients is fundamentally different from nonborderline psychiatric patients; and that the defined BPD subgroups of moving toward, against, and away differed significantly on specific structural and thematic object-relational dimensions. Aspects from Fairbairn's object relations theory and contributions from the self/representational, ego deficit, and Kernberg's models of borderline psychopathology are used to help interpret the findings. Identifying subtypes of BPD may allow for more precise discriminations in separating BPD from other disorders and may provide meaningful therapeutic and prognostic information for the different subgroups of borderline patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackerman, S. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., Clemence, A. J., Weatherhill, R., & Fowler, J. C. (2001). Convergent validity of Rorschach and TAT scales of object relations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acklin, M. W., Bibb, J. L., Bozen, P., & Jain, V. (1991). Early memories as expressions of relationship paradigms: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, G. (1985). Borderline psychopathology and its treatment. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnow, D., & Harrison, R. H. (1991). Affect in early memories of borderline patients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. D., Billington, R., & Becker, B. (1986). A scale for the assessment of object relations: Reliability, validity and factorial invariance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 733–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. D., Billington, R., Cicchetti, D., & Gibbons, J. (1988). Do object relations deficits distinguish BPD from other diagnostic groups? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 511–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, G., & Blanck, B. (1979). Ego psychology II. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S. J., Brennis, C. B., Schimek, J. G., & Glick, M. (1976). Normal development and psychopathological impairment of the concept of the object in the Rorschach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 5, 364–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatt, S., & Lerner, H. (1983). The psychological assessment of object representation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1990). Awareness, the unconscious, and repression: An experimental psychologist's perspective. In J. Singer (Ed.), Repression and dissociation: Implications for personality, theory, psychopathology, and health (pp. 209–231). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, A. R. (1990). Earliest childhood memories: Vol. 1. Theory and application to clinical practice. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buie, D. H., & Adler, G. (1973). The uses of confrontation in psychotherapy of borderline cases. In G. Adler & P. G. Myers (Eds.), Confrontation in psychotherapy (pp. 123–146). New York: Science House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, S. (1988). Object relations therapy: Using the relationship. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celani, D. P. (1993). The treatment of the borderline patient: Applying Fairbairn's object relations theory in the clinical setting. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chessick, R. D. (1974). Defective ego feeling and the quest for being in the borderline patient. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 3, 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. G., Sild, K. R., Ludolph, P. S., & Lohr, N. E. (1983). Test-retest reliability of the diagnostic interview for borderlines. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 1307–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelman, E. (1985). Level of object representation in depression: A longitudinal study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Adelphi University.

  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1944). Endopsychic structure considered in terms of object relationships. International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 25, pts 1 & 2.

  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). An object relations theory of the personality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1955). Observations in defense of the object relations theory of the personality. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 28, 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, A. A. (1988). Differential diagnosis of borderline and narcissistic personality disorders. In H. D. Lerner & P. A. Lerner (Eds.), Primitive mental states and the Rorschach (pp. 299–337). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, M. A. (1989). Differential diagnosis of borderline and narcissistic personality disorders. In H. D. Lerner & P. M. Lerner (Eds.), Primitive mental states and the Rorschach (pp. 299–337). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosch, J. (1967). Psychoanalytic considerations of the psychotic character. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15, 606–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, J., Hart, S. W., & Gartner, A. (1989). Psychological tests signs of borderline personality disorder: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 413–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovacchini, P. (1979). The many sides of helplessness: The borderline patient. In J. LeBoit & A. Capponi (Eds.), Advances in psychotherapy of the borderline patient (pp. 227–267). New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, L. R. (1996). Primitive defenses, object relations, and symptom clusters in borderline psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 204–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinker, R., Sr., Werble, B., & Drye, R. (1968). The borderline syndrome. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, J. G., & Zanarini, M. C. (1983). Diagnostic interview for borderlines-revised. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Guntrip, H. (1961). Personality structure and human interaction: The developing synthesis of psycho-dynamic theory. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1945). Our inner conflicts. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1984). Severe personality disorders: Psychotherapeutic strategies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1975). Some theoretical conclusions regarding the emotional life of the infant. In M. Klein (Ed.), Envy and gratitude and other works, 1946-1963. New York: Delacorte Press. (Original work published 1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, J. (1997). Internal objects-a theoretical analysis of Jungian and Kleinian models. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 42, 653–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenigsberg, H. W., Kernberg, O. F., & Schomerr, J. (1983). Diagnosing borderline conditions in an outpatient setting. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self: A systematic approach to the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, A., & Mayman, M. (1974). Objective representations in dreams and other projective tests. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 38, 445–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, H. D., & Lerner, P. M. (1983). Multiple dimensions of object relations in neurotic, borderline, and schizophrenic patients. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (pp. 53–57). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, H. D., & St. Peter, S. (1984). Patterns of object relations in neurotic, borderline and schizophrenic patients. Psychigla, 47, 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. (1976). Psychotherapy of the borderline adult: A developmental approach. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. F. (1990). Psychotherapy of borderline and narcissistic disorders: Establishing a therapeutic alliance (A developmental, self, and object relations approach). Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. F., & Rinsley, D. B. (1975). The borderline syndrome: The role of the mother in the genesis and psychic structure of the borderline personality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56, 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayman, M. (1968). Early memories and character structure. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personalily Assessment, 32, 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlashan, T. H., & Heinssen, R. K. (1989). Narcissitic, antisocial and noncomorbid subgroups of borderline disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 12, 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J., Lohr, W., Westen, D., Gold, L., & Silk, K. (1992). Malevolent object representations in borderline personality disorder and major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J. T., Silk, K. R., Westen, D., Lohr, W. E., Gold, L. J., Goodrich S., & Ogata, S. (1991). Object representations in the early memories of sexually abused borderline patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 864–869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, A. (1995). Differentiation between patients with schizophrenia and borderline disorders in the Percept-genetic Object-Relation Test, PORT. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 68, 287–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, D. B., & Zanarini, M. C. (2001). Developmental aspects of borderline personality disorder. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 9, 294–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seinfeld, J. (1990). The bad object. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, W. (1980). The psychological assessment of structural and thematic object representations in borderline and schizophrenic patients. In J. Kwawer, G. Lerner, P. Lerner, & A. Sugarman (Eds.), Borderline phenomena and the Rorschach test (pp. 321–340). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, W., & Lapidus, L. (1981). Qualitative differences in manifest object representations: Implications for a multidimensional model of psychological functioning. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 49, 157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, W. E., & Sugarman, A. (1984). Dimensions of internalized object relations in borderline and schizophrenic patients. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 1, 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. H. (1980). The borderline syndrome. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stricker, G., & Healy, B. D. (1990). Projective assessment of object relations: A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Assessment, 2, 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, J., Westen, P., Lohr, N., Silk, K., Benjamin, J., Becker, S., & Varus, N. (1990). Object relations in borderlines, major depression, and normals: Analysis of Rorschach human figure responses. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 296–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urist, J. (1977). The Rorschach test and the assessment of object relations. Journal of Personalily Assessment, 41, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D. (1990). Towards a revised theory of borderline object relations: Contributions of empirical research. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 71, 661–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D., Barends, A., Leigh, J., Mendel, M., & Silbert, D. (1990). Social cognition and object relations scale (SCORS): Manual for coding interview data. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Westen, D., Ludolph, P., Lerner, H., Puffins, S., & Wiss, C. F. (1990). Object relations in borderline adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 338–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D., Ludolph, P., Silk, K., Kellam, A., Gold, L., & Lohr, N. (1990). Object relations in borderline adolescents and adults: Developmental differences. Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 360–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanarini, M. C., Gunderson, J. G., & Frankenburg, F. R. (1986). Diagnostic interview for borderlines-revised. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Zanarini, M. C., Gunderson, J. G., Frankenburg, F. R., & Chauncey, D. L. (1989). The revised diagnostic interview for borderlines: Discriminating BPD from other Axis II disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 3, 1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (2000). Personality & risk to King: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68, 999–1029.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. St. John's University, Jamaica, NY

    Gerald Tramantano, Rafael Art. Javier & Mirna Colon

Authors
  1. Gerald Tramantano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rafael Art. Javier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mirna Colon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tramantano, G., Javier, R.A. & Colon, M. Discriminating Among Subgroups of Borderline Personality Disorder: An Assessment of Object Representations. Am J Psychoanal 63, 149–175 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024079115405

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024079115405

Search

Navigation