Skip to main content
Log in

Risk assessment in clinical pharmacy

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medication error forms a major proportion of the errors in the medical system. Despite many studies of adverse drug events, there are no systematic ways of ensuring safety, or of assessing how safe a pharmaceutical system is. Risk assessment is required in hazardous industries such as nuclear power or oil and gas. Risk assessments involve identifying the defences and assessing their effectiveness and are relatively uncommon in clinical pharmacy , as opposed to reactive approaches involving incident analyses. Risk factors, that degrade barriers, can be identified and their effect measured. A risk assessment structure for pharmacy processes is proposed that can also be used to support incident investigation and analysis processes and provide a standard for audit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kohn L, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America; Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Audit Commission, A spoonful of sugar. Medicines management in NHS hospitals. London: Audit Commission, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. NRC Handelsblad, 1 May 2001.

  4. Medication Safety Task Force, 2001.

  5. Phillips DP, Christenfeld N, Glynn LM. Increase in US medication-error deaths between 1983 and 1993. Lancet 1998; 351: 643–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bogner MS, Human error in medicine. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ 1998; 316: 1154–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Senders J. Medical devices, medical errors and medical accidents. In M. Bogner, editor, Medical error. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Cott H. Human errors: their causes and reduction. In M. Bogner, editor, Medical error. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bernstein PL. Against the gods: the remarkable story of risk. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berwick DM. Not again! BMJ 2001; 322: 247–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bickford Smith PJ. Designing safer medical devices requires financial and medical support. BMJ 2001; 322: 548.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seal JRC. Erroneous intrathecal injections result from a problem with protocols. BMJ 2001; 322: 548.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cook RI. Combatting medical errors - letter in reply. Lancet 2000; 356: 167.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly WN. Potential risks and prevention, part 1: fatal adverse drug events. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58: 1317–24

    Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips J, Beam S, Brinker A, Holquist C, Honig P, Lee LY, Pamer C. Retrospective analysis of mortalities associated with medication errors. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58: 1835–41.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly WN. Potential risks and prevention, part 2: druginduced permanent disabilities. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001; 58: 1325–9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reason JT, Carthey J, de Leval MR. Diagnosing 'Vulnerable System Syndrome': a prerequisite to effective risk management. Qual Health Care 2000; 10: 21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reason JT. Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reason JT. Managing the risks of organisational accidents. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Turner B. Man-made disasters. Oxford: Wykeham, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wagenaar WA, Groeneweg J. 100 Accidents at sea - multiple causes and impossible consequences. Int J Man Machine Studies 1987; 27: 587–98.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wagenaar J, Groeneweg J, Hudson PTW, Reason JT. Safety in the oil industry. Ergonomics 1994; 37: 1999–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reason JT, Shotton R, Wagenaar WA, Groeneweg J, Hudson PTW. Tripod - a principled approach to safety. Leiden University, Report for Shell International Exploration and Production, 1987.

  25. Maurino D, Reason JT, Johnstoen N, Lee R. Beyond aviation human factors. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ 2000; 320: 768–70.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hudson PTW, Reason JT, Wagenaar WA, Bentley PD, Primrose M, Visser JP. Tripod Delta: proactive approach to enhanced safety. J Petroleum Technol 1994; 46: 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  28. vd Graaf, GC, Milne D, Primrose M. HSE cases - some lessons learned. Exploration and Production Newsletter. Shell International, 1996.

  29. Cullen The Hon Lord D. The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster. 2 Vols. London: HMSO, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tutuarima JA, Linskens ME, de Wit APM, Taat CW, de Haan RJ, Bossuyt PPM. Zuster, dokter of patient - incidentie en preventie van medicatiefouten in het AMC; een foutenanalyse. [Nurse, doctor or patient - incidence and prevention of medication errors in the AMC; an error analysis.] Internal Report, Amsterdam Medical Centre, 1995.

  31. Dean D, Schachter M, Vincent C, Barber N. Causes of prescribing errors in hospital in-patients: a prospective study Lancet 2002; 359: 1373–8

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hudson PTW, Verschuur WLG, Lawton R, Parker D, Reason JT. Bending the rules II - the violation manual. Centre for Safety Science, Leiden University, 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hudson, P., Guchelaar, HJ. Risk assessment in clinical pharmacy. Pharm World Sci 25, 98–103 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024068817085

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024068817085

Navigation