Abstract
The current studies were conducted to examine two questions regarding the development of an ethic of care versus an ethic of justice, where the former is associated with being female and the latter is associated with being male. First, does gender role orientation in adolescence predict the ethical orientation one adopts better than gender itself does? Second, does adolescents' ethical orientation predict their volunteering behavior? To answer these questions, two studies were conducted. In Study 1, adolescents completed Bem's Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) and Jensen's World View Questionnaire (WVQ) which assesses ethical orientation. Girls and individuals high in femininity were higher on the ethic of care than were boys and individuals high in masculinity. In addition, individuals with a feminine gender orientation received higher care scores than individuals with an androgynous orientation. Regression analyses indicated that gender orientation accounted for more of the variance in the ethic of care than did gender. In Study 2, older adolescents completed Jensen's WVQ and were subsequently asked to volunteer in one of two settings: a personal setting or an impersonal setting. Individuals high in the ethic of care were more likely to volunteer and volunteered for more hours, but volunteered equally often in the two types of settings. Individuals who “apologized” for being unable to volunteer were higher on caring. The results are discussed in the context of Gilligan's theory of socialization to morality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ashmore, R. D. (1981). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 37-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634-643.
Bem, S. L. (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, 179-226.
Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.
Berkowitz, L., & Daniels, L. R. (1963). Responsibility and dependency. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 664-669.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
Dunn, J., Bretherton, I., & Munn, P. (1987). Conversations about feeling states between mothers and their children. Developmental Psychology, 23, 132-139.
Eagly, A. H. & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of men and women into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100-131.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223-237.
Gilligan, C., & Wiggins, G. (1988). The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. In C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, & J. M. Taylor (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain (pp. 111-138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greif, E. B., Alvarez, M., & Ullman, K. (1981). Recognizing emotions in other people: Sex differences in socialization. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.
Jensen, L. A. (1997). Different worldviews, different morals: America's culture war divide. Human Development, 40, 325-344.
Jensen, L. C., McGhie, A. P., & JensenJ. R. (1991). Do men's and women's world-views differ? Psychological Reports, 68, 312-314.
Karniol, R., Gabay, R., Ochion, Y., & Harari, Y. (1998). Is gender or gender-role orientation a better predictor of empathy in adolescence? Sex Roles, 39, 45-60.
Kuebli, J., Butler, S., & Fivush, R. (1995). Mother-child talk about past emotions: Relations of maternal language and child gender over time. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 265-283.
Lennon, R., & Eisenberg, N. (1987). Gender and age differences in empathy and sympathy, In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 195-217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liddell, D. L., & Davis, T. L. (1996). The Measure of Moral Orientation: Reliability and validity evidence. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 485-493.
Nelson, M. R. (1997). Examining the horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism within the United States and Denmark: How culture affects values, moral orientations and advertising persuasion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
Shields, S. A. (1995). The role of emotion beliefs and values in gender development. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 212-232.
Soechting, I., Skoe, E. E., & Marcia, J. E. (1994). Care-oriented moral reasoning and prosocial behavior: A question of gender or sex role orientation. Sex Roles, 31, 131-147.
Stander, V., & Jensen, L. (1993). The relationship of value orientation to moral cognition: Gender and cultural differences in the United States and China explored. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 42-52.
Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347-366.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Yacker, N., & Weinberg, S. L. (1990). Care and justice moral orientation: A scale for its assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 18-27.