Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond the Overall Balance: The Significance of Particular Tasks and Procedures for Perceptions of Fairness in Distributions of Household Work

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines an approach to perceptions of fairness that extends beyond the usual emphasis on the overall balance of what each person does. The emphasis falls instead on perceptions of fairness associated with particular tasks and particular procedures (ways of achieving a task division or a redistribution of tasks). The approach is illustrated by the summarized results of a series of studies. Results are discussed in terms of research questions that might now be taken further and in terms of expectations that appear to underlie perceptions of fairness: in particular, ideas about the ownership of tasks and about behaviors appropriate in family relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Backett, K. (1982). Mothers and Fathers: A Study of the Development and Negotiations of Parental Behavior, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J., and Western, M. (in press). Satisfaction with housework: Examining the paradox. Sociology.

  • Benin, M. H., and Agostinelli, J. (1988). Husbands' and wives' satisfaction with the division of labor. J. Marr. Fam. 50: 49–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, S. F., and Berk, R. A. (1979). Labor and Leisure at Home, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M. (1991). Juggling Time: How Australian Families Use Time, Office of the Status of Women, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, S. L., and Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives' perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. J. Marr Fam. 54: 570–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, J. M., Chen, M-J., Li Qing San, and Li Yuan (1997). “I didn't take it out”: Negotiating beyond causation in Australian and Chinese families. Unpublished manuscript, Macquarie University.

  • Clark, M. (1984). Implications of relationship type for understanding compatibility. In Ickes, W. (ed.), Compatible and Incompatible Relationships, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. (1994). Resource allocation in intimate relationships: Trying to make sense of a confusing literature. In Lerner, M. J., Mikula, G. (eds.), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond; Justice in Close Relationships, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P., and Farkas, G. (1986). Households, Employment and Gender: A Social, Economic, and Demographic View, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J., and Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating Family Responsibilities, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Social Relationships, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychol. Rev. 99: 689–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, A. P., and Tetlock, P. (in press). Taboo tradeoffs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the domains of relationships. Polit. Psychol.

  • Goodnow, J. J. (1996). From household practices to parents' ideas about work and interpersonal relationships. In Harkness, S., and Super, C. (eds.), Parents' Cultural Belief Systems, Guilford, New York, pp. 313–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J. J., and Bowes, J. M. (1994). Men, Women, and Household Work, Oxford University Press, New York/Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J. J. Bowes, J. M., Warton, P. M., Dawes, L. J., & Taylor, A. J. (1991). Would you ask someone else to do this task? Parents' and children's ideas about household work requests. Dev. Psychol. 27: 817–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J. J., and Delaney, S. (1989). Children's household work: differentiating types of work and styles of assignment. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 10: 209–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J. J., Miller, P. J., and Kessel, F. (1995) (eds). Cultural Practices as Contexts for Development, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J. J., and Warton, P. M. (1991). The social bases of social cognition: Interactions about work and their implications. Merrill-Palmer Quart. 37: 27–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J. J., and Warton, P. M. (1992). Understanding responsibility: Adolescents' views of delegation and follow-through in the family. J. Soc. Dev. 1: 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, J. J., and Warton, P. M. (1996). Direct and indirect responsibility: Distributing blame. J. Moral Educ. 25: 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusec, J. E., Goodnow, J. J., and Cohen, L. (1996). Household tasks and the development of concern for others. Dev. Psychol. 32: 997–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, L. L. (1982). Determinants of role-sharing behaviour: A study of egalitarian couples. Sex Roles 8: 747–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M., and van de Vliert, E. (1997). The marital dynamics of conflict over the division of labor. J. Marr. Fam. 59: 635–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1993). Gender, entitlement, and the distribution of family labor. J. Soc. Issues 49: 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1993). On the experience of injustice. In Strobe, W., and Hewstone, M. (eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, Wiley, New York, pp. 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G., Freudenthaler, H. F., Brennacher-Kroll, S., and Brunschko, B. (1997a). Divisions of labor in student households: Gender inequality, perceived justice, and satisfaction. Basic Appl. Psychol. 19: 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G., Freudenthaler, H. F., Brennacher-Kroll, S., and Schiller-Brandl, R. (1997b). Arrangements and rules of distribution of burdens and duties: The case of household chores. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 27: 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G., Petri, B., and Tanzer, N. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 20: 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, B. (1996). From is to ought and the kitchen sink: On the justice of distributions in close relationships. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. L. (eds.), Current Social Concerns About Justice, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 103–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, B., and Montada, L. (1994). Problems with the transition to parenthood: Perceived responsibility for restrictions and losses and the experience of injustice. In Lerner, M. J., and Mikula, G. (eds.), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond: Justice in Close Relationships, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., and Spitze, G. (1992). Whistle while you work? The effect of household work on women's and men's well-being. Soc. Sci. Quart. 73: 844–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, L., and Scanzoni, J. (1976). Sex Roles, Women's Work, and Marital Conflict: A Study of Family Change, Heath Press, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shure, M. B. (1968). Fairness, generosity, and selfishness: The naive psychology of children and young adults. Child Dev. 39: 857–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steil, J. M. (1994). Equity and entitlement in marriage: Benefits and barriers. In Lerner, M. J., and Mikula, G. (eds.), Entitlement and the Affectional Bond: Justice in Close Relationships, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 229–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women's sense of fairness. J. Fam Issues 12: 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., and Lind, A. E. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warton, P. M., and Goodnow, J. J. (1991). The nature of responsibility: Children's understanding of “your job.” Child Dev. 62: 156–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. K., and Brinkerhoff; D. B. (1981). Children's work in the family: Its significance and meaning. J. Marr. Fam. 43: 789–798.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodnow, J.J. Beyond the Overall Balance: The Significance of Particular Tasks and Procedures for Perceptions of Fairness in Distributions of Household Work. Social Justice Research 11, 359–376 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023295018444

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023295018444

Navigation