Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex Differences in Body Movement and Visual Attention: An Integrated Analysis of Movement and Gaze in Mixed-Sex Dyads

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The body movement and visual behavior of women and men engaged in mixed-sex dyadic interactions were analyzed in a three-factorial design including the personal factor sex of the interactants, the situational factor partner familiarity, and the situational factor visual attention of the interaction partner. Measures of nonverbal activity were derived from integrated time-series protocols of body movement and gaze for both interaction partners. Data analysis revealed significant sex differences in individual frequency and duration of movement and gaze, as well as dyadic differences for both behavior measures. Men, in general, were more active while women were more visually attentive. Also, the results point to specific interaction effects between sex and familiarity. The data indicate that there were specific adaptational strategies for both sexes with familiar and unfamiliar partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello, J. R. (1972). A test of equilibrium theory: Visual interaction in relation to orientation, distance, and sex of interactants. Psychonomic Science, 27, 335–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1975). Bodily communication. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bente, G. (1989). Facilities for the graphical computer simulation of head and body movements. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 21, 455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bente, G., Feist, A., & Elder S. (1996). Person perception effects of computer simulated male and female head movement. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed, G., & Porter, M. (1972). Eye contact, attitudes, and attitude change among males. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 120, 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. E., Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1990). Reducing sex differences in visual displays of dominance: Knowledge is power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 358–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1989). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Coker, D. A, & Coker, R. A. (1986). Communicative effects of gaze behavior: A test of two contrasting explanations. Human Communication Research, 12, 495–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Dillman, L. (1995). Gender, immediacy, and nonverbal communication. In P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody, (Eds.), Gender, power, and communication in human relationships (pp. 63–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Weitz, S. (1981). Sex differences in body movements and positions. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior (pp. 81–94). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dindia, K. (1987). The effects of sex of subject and sex of partner on interruptions. Human Communication Research, 13, 345–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K, Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. E. (1988). The relationship of visual power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 233–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1982). Decoding visual dominance behavior: Attributions of power based on the relative percentages of looking while speaking and looking while listening. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Ellyson, S. L., Keating, C. F, Heltman, K, & Brown, C. E. (1988). Power displays between men and women in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaghy, W. C. (1988). Nonverbal communication measurement. In P. Emmert & L. Barker (Eds.), Measurement of communication behavior (pp. 296–332). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaghy, W. C., & Goldberg, J. (1991). Head movement and gender differences following the onset of simultaneous speech. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 56, 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. D., Jr., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face-to-face interaction: Research, methods, and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. C., & Ludwig, L. M. (1972). Visual behavior in social interaction. Journal of Communication, 22, 375–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S.L., Dovido, J.F., & Fehr, B.J. (1981). Visual behavior and dominance in women and men. In C. Mayo & N.M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior (pp. 63–80). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (1976). Interactional psychology and personality. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R. V. (1974). Visual interaction: The glances of power and preference. In S. Weitz (Ed.), Nonverbal communication: Readings with commentary (pp. 163–205). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R. V., Ellyson, S. L., & Long, B. (1975). Visual behavior as an aspect of power role relationships. In P. Pliner, L. Krames & T. Alloway (Eds.), Nonverbal communication of aggression (pp. 21–52). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R.V., Gray, D., & Schuette, D. (1965). Visual behavior in a dyad as affected by interview content, and sex of respondent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R. V., Thibaut, J., Hickey, C. B., & Gumpert, P. (1970). Visual interaction in relation to Machiavellianism and an unethical act. In R. Christie & F. Geis (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 53–75). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R. V., & Winters, L. C. (1965). Affective relations and mutual gaze in dyads. In S. Tomkins & C. Izard (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and personality (pp. 319–350). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. A., Mulac, A., & Dindia, K. (1994, July). Convergence and reciprocity in male and female communication patterns in spouse and stranger interaction. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Fisch, H. U., Frey, S., & Hirsbrunner, H. P. (1983). Analyzing nonverbal behavior in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 307–318.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, W. V., Ekman, P., & Wallbott, H. (1979). Measuring hand movements. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 4, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, S. J. (1979). Sex differences in nonverbal behavior. Sex Roles, 5, 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, S., Hirsbrunner, H. P., Florin, A., Daw, W., & Crawford, R. (1983). A unified approach to the investigation of nonverbal and verbal behavior in communication research. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (pp. 143–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, S., Bente, G., Fuchs, A., Preiswerk, G., Glatt, A., & Imhof, P. (1989). Spontaneous motor activity in healthy volunteers after single doses of haloperidol. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 4, 39–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fromme, D. K., & Beam, D. C. (1974). Dominance and sex differences in nonverbal responses to differential eye contact. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, A. G., & Saitta, M. B. (1987). Gender, nonverbal behavior, and perceived dominance: A test of the theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1985). Male and female nonverbal behavior. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 195–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., & Halberstadt, A. G. (1986). Smiling and gazing. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 136–158). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett, J. J., Bailey, K. G., & Gibson, S. W. (1970). Personal space as influenced by sex and type of movement. Journal of Psychology, 76, 139–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. M. (1995). Body politics revisited: What do we know today? In P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody, (Eds.), Gender, power, and communication in human relationships (pp. 27–61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsbrunner, H.P., Frey, S., & Crawford, R. (1987). Movement in human interaction: Description, parameter formation, and analysis. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication (pp. 99–140, 2nd Edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberty, C. J., & Morris J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W. (1982). A basic paradigm for the study of personality, roles, and social behavior. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 305–341). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W., & Barnes, R. (1977). The role of sex and self-monitoring in unstructured dyadic interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. B., Burch, N. R., Bloom, S. W., & Edelberg, R. (1963). Affective orientation and physiological activity (GSR) in small peer groups. Psychosomatic Medicine, 25, 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologicia, 26, 22–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1978). Looking in conversation and the regulation of turns at talk: A comment on the papers of G. Beattie and D. R. Rutter et al. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C. T. (1983). A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, M. (1981). Gender gestures: Sex, sex roles and nonverbal communication. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–150). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, T. A. (1981). Nonverbal and paraverbal control in dyads and triads: Sex or power differences? Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leet-Pellegrini, H. N. (1980). Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. In H. Giles, W. P Robinson & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 97–104). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libby, W. L. (1970). Eye contact and direction of looking as stable individual differences. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 4, 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marche, T. A., & Peterson, C. (1993). The development and sex-related use of interruption behavior. Human Communication Research, 19, 388–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markel, N. N., Prebor, L. D., & Brandt, J. F. (1972). Biosocial factors in dyadic communication: Sex and speaking intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, C., & Henley, N. M. (Eds.) (1981). Gender and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, A. (1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64, 377–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarrick, A. K., Manderscheid, R. W., & Silbergeld, S. (1981). Gender differences in competition and dominance during married couples group therapy. Social Pychology Quarterly, 44, 164–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulac, A. (1989). Men's and women's talk in same-gender and mixed-gender dyads: Power or polemic? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8, 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulac, A., Studley, L. B., Wiemann, J. W., & Bradac, J. J. (1987). Male/female gaze in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: Gender-linked differences and mutual influence. Human Communication Research, 13, 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulac, A., Wiemann, J., Widenmann, S. J., & Gibson, T. W. (1988). Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55, 315–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poling, T. H. (1978). Sex differences, dominance, and physical attractiveness in the use of nonverbal emblems. Psychological Reports, 43, 1087–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1987). Nonverbal behavior, dominance, and the basis of status in task groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 683–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, H. M. (1966). Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and nonverbal responses in the dyad. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 597–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaich, J. M. (1976). Gestures: Similarities and differences between males and females. Dissertation Abstracts International, 37,(2–B), 1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. J., Hastorf, A. H., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1979). Person perception. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, C. C., & Cohen, J. L. (1988). Communicator style and social style: Similarities and differences between the sexes. Communication Quarterly, 36, 192–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimboli, C., & Walker, M. B. (1984). Switching pauses in cooperative and competitive conversations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrugt, A., & Kerkstra, A. (1984). Sex differences in nonverbal communication. Semiotica, 50, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. (1979). Against our will: Male interruptions of females in cross-sex conversations. In J. Orasanu, M. Slater, & L. Adler (Eds.), Language, sex and gender (pp. 81–97). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327, 81–97.

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae & N. Henley (Eds.), Language gender and society (pp. 102–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, T. C., & Derlega, V. J. (1985). Influence of touch and preferences for control on visual behavior and subjective responses. In S. L. Ellyson & J. K. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 165–182). NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, F. N. (1966). Initial speaking distance as a function of the speakers' relationship. Psychonomic Science, 5, 221–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanna, M. P., & Pack, S. J. (1975). On the self-fullfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 583–591.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychologisches Institut, Differentielle Psychologie und Kommunikationsforschung, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Gary Bente

Authors
  1. Gary Bente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William C. Donaghy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dorit Suwelack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bente, G., Donaghy, W.C. & Suwelack, D. Sex Differences in Body Movement and Visual Attention: An Integrated Analysis of Movement and Gaze in Mixed-Sex Dyads. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 22, 31–58 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022900525673

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022900525673

Keywords

Search

Navigation