Abstract
The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effects of self-monitoring on increasing the on-task behaviors of four at-risk middle school students, and to examine its indirect effects on academic performance. Additionally, we attempted to develop and validate cost- and time-efficient procedures that typical classroom teachers could use. The data from a multiple baseline design across three academic settings, replicated with four students, revealed immediate increases in on-task behavior as each student began to self-monitor in each sequential setting. The data also revealed slightly higher levels of academic performance and, in most instances, gradually accelerating trends. These findings suggest that self-monitoring is a cost- and time-efficient procedure that classroom teachers can use to teach at-risk students to manage their own behaviors.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (1995). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Publishing.
Bahr, M., Fuchs, D. Fuchs, L. S., Fernstrom, P., & Stecker, P. M. (1993). Effectiveness of student versus teacher monitoring during pre-referral intervention. Exceptionally: A Research Journal, 4, 17–30.
Boyle, J. R., & Hughes, C. A. (1994). Effects of self-monitoring and subsequent fading of external promotes on the on-task behavior and task productivity of elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Behavior Education, 4, 439–457.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning Points. Washington, DC: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Carr, S. C., & Punzo, R. P. (1993). The effects of self-monitoring of academic accuracy and productivity on the performance of students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 241–250.
DiGangi, S. A., & Maag, J. W. (1992). A component of self-management training with behaviorally disordered youth. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 281–290.
DiGangi, S. A., Maag, J. W., & Rutherford, J. B. (1991). self-graphing of on-task behavior: Enhancing the reactive effects of self-monitoring on on-task behavior and academic performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 221–230.
Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., Jackson, M., Wright, S., Ramos, E., & Brinson, S. (1995). Self-monitoring of classroom behaviors with students exhibiting emotional and behavioral challenges. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 165–177.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Bahr, M., Reeder, P., Gilman, S., Fernstrom, P., & Roberts, H. (1990). Prerefferal information to increase attention and work productivity among difficult-to-teach pupils. Focus on Exceptional children, 22, 1–8.
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Reid, R., McEiroy, K., & Stern Hambly, R. (1994) Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Replication and cross-task comparison studies. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 17, 121–139.
Hughes, C. (1994). Teaching generalized skills to persons with disabilities. In R. Gardner, III, D. M. Sainato, J. O., Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 335–348). Pacific Grove, CA Brooks/Cole.
Hyland, P., & Keaton, C. (1994). Self-monitoring and self-graphing on students' preparedness as a prerequisite for academics. (Eric Document Reproduction Services No. ED 367742).
Kern, L., Dunlap, G., Childs, K. E., & Clarke, S. (1994). Use of a class wide self-management program to improve the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 17, 445–448.
Kneedler, R. D., & Hallahan, D. P. (1981). Self-monitoring of on-task behavior with learning disabled children: Current studies and directions. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2, 73–82.
Larson, J. D. (1992). Anger and aggression management techniques through the “think first” curriculum. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 18, 101–117.
Lee, C., & Tindal, G. A. (1994). Self-recording and goal setting.: Effects on on-task and math productivity of low achieving Korean elementary school students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 459–479.
Lloyd, J. W., & Hughes, C. (1993). Introduction to the self-management series. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 425–427.
Lloyd, J. W., & Hughes, C. (1994a). Introduction to the self-management series: II. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 107.
Lloyd, J. W., & Hughes, C. (1994b). Introduction to the self-management series: III. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 437–438.
Maag, J. W. (1992). Effects of self-monitoring and contingent reinforcement on on-task behavior and academic productivity of learning disabled students: A social validation study. Psychology in the Schools, 29, 157–172.
Maag, J., Reid, R., & DiGangi, S. A. (1993). Effects of self-monitoring attention, accuracy, and productivity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 26, 329–344.
Marshall, K. J., Lloyd, J. W., & Hallahan, D. P. (1993). Effects of training to increase self-monitoring accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 445–459.
McLaughlin, T. F., Krappman, V. F., & Welsh, J. M. (1985). The effects of self-monitoring for on-task behavior with behavioral disordered special education students. Remedial and Special Education, 6(4), 42–45.
National Center for Education Statistics (1997). The condition of education (NCES Publication No. 96–304, GPO No. 065–000–00871–8). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
National Center for Education Statistics (1996). Youth indicators: Trends in the well-being of American youth (NCES Publication No. 96–027, GPO No. 065–000–00898–0). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
National Center for Education Statistics (1995). The school district data book (NCES Reference Manual No. 95–705). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Prater, M. A, Joy, R., Chilman, B., Temple, J., & Miller, S. R. (1991). Self-monitoring of on-task behavior by adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 164–177.
Prater, M. A. (1994). Improving academic and behavior skills through self-management procedures. Preventing School Failure, 38, 5–9.
Prater, M. A., Hogan S., & Miller, S. R. (1992). Using self-monitoring to improve on-task behavior and academic skills of an adolescent with mild handicaps across special and regular education settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 43–55.
Reid, R., & Harris, K. R. (1993). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Effects on attention and academic performance. Exceptional Children, 60, 29–40.
Rhode, G., Morgan, D. P., & Young, K. R. (1983). Generalization and maintenance of treatment gains of behavioral handicapped students from resource rooms to regular classrooms using self-evaluative procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 171–120.
Seabaugh, G. O., & Schumaker, J. B. (1994). The effects of self-regulation training on the academic productivity of secondary students with learning problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 109–133.
Snider, V. (1987). A response to Hallahan and Lloyd. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 10, 157–159.
Stetson, C. (1988). Modifying inappropriate behavior of emotionally disturbed students ages 6 to 10 using self-monitoring and group monitoring techniques. (Report No. EC 212 583). Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 305 783).
Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
Storey, K. (1994). Functional analysis and intervention for disruptive behaviors of a kindergarten student. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 6.
Sweeney, W. J., Salva, E., Cooper, J. O., & Talbert-Johnson, C. (1993). Using self-evaluation to improve difficult-to-read handwriting of secondary students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 427–443.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wood, S.J., Murdock, J.Y., Cronin, M.E. et al. Effects of Self-Monitoring on On-Task Behaviors of At-Risk Middle School Students. Journal of Behavioral Education 8, 263–279 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022891725732
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022891725732