Skip to main content
Log in

Is Partner Aggression Related to Appraisals of Coercive Control by a Partner?

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research and clinical reports on men who are aggressive towards their intimate partners find that these men tend to behave in highly controlling ways towards such partners (e.g., restricting their social interactions, monitoring of activities, and reducing decision-making power). This study tests the hypothesis that men and women in violent dating relationships appraise such behaviors differently than individuals in nonviolent relationships. Based on clinical and empirical partner abuse literature, 119 college students rated the extent to which they perceived hypothetical behaviors towards a partner as ‘controlling.’ Results suggest that individuals who had either engaged in or received partner aggression appraised restrictive, domineering, and coercive behaviors from a male to a female partner, and from a female to a male partner as less controlling than individuals who had neither perpetrated nor received partner aggression. Men also viewed those behaviors as less controlling than did women. Generalizability, clinical implications, and directions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arias, I., and Johnson, P. (1989). Evaluations of physical aggression among intimate dyads. J. Interpers. Viol. 4: 298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baucom, D. H., Sayers, S. L., and Duhe, A. (1989). Attributional style and attributional patterns among married couples. J. Personal. Social Psychol. 56: 596–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1993). Men, Women and Aggression, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., and Vivian, D. (1992). Marital aggression: Impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives. Arch. Intern. Med. 152: 1178–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascardi, M., and Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital aggression. J. Family Violence, 10: 265–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. (1979). Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. (1984). The nature and antecedents of violent events. Brit. J. Criminol. 24: 269–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1988). The Domestic Assault of Women, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G., and Feldman, S. (1996). Rejection sensitivity and male violence against romantic partners. Under review.

  • Ehrensaft, M. K. (1994). Control Interview. Unpublished manuscript, University Marital Therapy Clinic, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

  • Ehrensaft, M. K., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Heyman, R. E, O'Leary, K. D., and Lawrence, E. (1994, November). Assessing perceptions of spousal control in physically aggressive versus nonaggressive husbands and wives. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, San Diego, CA.

  • Ehrensaft, M. K. (1996). Coercive control and physical aggression: An observational study of behaviors in context, Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

  • Ehrensaft, M. K., and Vivian, D. (1996). Spouses' reasons for not reporting existing marital aggression as a marital problem. J. Fam. Psychol. 10: 443–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., and Bradbury, T. N. (1988). The impact of attributions in marriage: An experimental analysis. J. Social Clin. Psychol. 7: 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D. (1983). Common features of family abuse. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.), The Dark Side of Families: Current Research on Family Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., and Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. J. Fam. Viol. 5: 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W. (1985). Men Who Batter: An Integrated Approach to Stopping Wife Abuse, Learning Publications, Holmes Beach, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, K. L. (1993, November). The function of aggression is different for men and women. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta, GA.

  • Kurtz, D. (1993). Physical assault by husbands: A major social problem. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D. (1988). Physical aggression between spouses: A social learning theory perspective. In Van Hasselt, V. B., Morrison, R. L., Bellack, A. S., and Hersen, M. (eds.), Handbook of Family Violence, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D., and Jouriles, E. N. (1993). Psychological abuse between adult partners: Prevalence and effects on partners and children. In Abate, L. L. (ed.), Handbook of Developmental Family Psychology and Psychopathology, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H. S., Neidig, P., and O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Male-female and aggressor-victim differences in the factor structure of the Modified Conflict Tactics Scale. J. Interpers. Viol. 9: 366–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathus, J., and O'Leary, K. D. (1993, November). Attachment, spouse-specific dependency and use of control in maritally violent, discordant nonviolent and happily married men. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta, GA.

  • Rogers, L. E. (1972). Relational Communication Control Coding Manual. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University.

  • Rouse, L. (1990). The dominance motive in abusive partners: Identifying couples at risk. J. Coll. Stud. Devel. 31: 330–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 90–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E. (1988). Domestic Violence and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E. (1991). Psychological aggression in dating relationships: The role of interpersonal control. J. Marr. Fam. 6: 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships. Social Psychol. Quart. 50: 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scale. J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scale and its critics. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assault by husbands: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles, and Loseke, D. R. (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor Press/Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Viol. Vict. 4: 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1992). Psychological abuse of women. In Campbell, J. (ed.), Assessing the Risk of Dangerousness, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 290–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivian, D., and Heyman, R. E. (1994, November). Aggression against wives: Mutual verbal combat ‘in context.’ Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, San Diego, CA.

  • Vivian, D., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1994). Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison. Viol. Vict. 9: 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivian, D., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., and Ayerle, C. (1995). Thematic Coding of Dyadic Interactions Manual, Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY.

  • Walker, L. E. (1981). The Battered Woman, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J., and Lanning, W. (1992) Sex role beliefs, control and social isolation of battered women. J. Fam. Viol. 7: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yllo, K. (1983). Using a feminist approach in quantitative research: A case study. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.), The Dark Side of Families Current Research on Family Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 277–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ehrensaft, M.K., Vivian, D. Is Partner Aggression Related to Appraisals of Coercive Control by a Partner?. Journal of Family Violence 14, 251–266 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022862332595

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022862332595

Navigation