Abstract
Research and clinical reports on men who are aggressive towards their intimate partners find that these men tend to behave in highly controlling ways towards such partners (e.g., restricting their social interactions, monitoring of activities, and reducing decision-making power). This study tests the hypothesis that men and women in violent dating relationships appraise such behaviors differently than individuals in nonviolent relationships. Based on clinical and empirical partner abuse literature, 119 college students rated the extent to which they perceived hypothetical behaviors towards a partner as ‘controlling.’ Results suggest that individuals who had either engaged in or received partner aggression appraised restrictive, domineering, and coercive behaviors from a male to a female partner, and from a female to a male partner as less controlling than individuals who had neither perpetrated nor received partner aggression. Men also viewed those behaviors as less controlling than did women. Generalizability, clinical implications, and directions for future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arias, I., and Johnson, P. (1989). Evaluations of physical aggression among intimate dyads. J. Interpers. Viol. 4: 298–307.
Baucom, D. H., Sayers, S. L., and Duhe, A. (1989). Attributional style and attributional patterns among married couples. J. Personal. Social Psychol. 56: 596–607.
Campbell, A. (1993). Men, Women and Aggression, Basic Books, New York.
Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., and Vivian, D. (1992). Marital aggression: Impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives. Arch. Intern. Med. 152: 1178–1184.
Cascardi, M., and Vivian, D. (1995). Context for specific episodes of marital aggression. J. Family Violence, 10: 265–293.
Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. (1979). Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy, Free Press, New York.
Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. (1984). The nature and antecedents of violent events. Brit. J. Criminol. 24: 269–288.
Dutton, D. G. (1988). The Domestic Assault of Women, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
Downey, G., and Feldman, S. (1996). Rejection sensitivity and male violence against romantic partners. Under review.
Ehrensaft, M. K. (1994). Control Interview. Unpublished manuscript, University Marital Therapy Clinic, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
Ehrensaft, M. K., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Heyman, R. E, O'Leary, K. D., and Lawrence, E. (1994, November). Assessing perceptions of spousal control in physically aggressive versus nonaggressive husbands and wives. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, San Diego, CA.
Ehrensaft, M. K. (1996). Coercive control and physical aggression: An observational study of behaviors in context, Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
Ehrensaft, M. K., and Vivian, D. (1996). Spouses' reasons for not reporting existing marital aggression as a marital problem. J. Fam. Psychol. 10: 443–453.
Fincham, F. D., and Bradbury, T. N. (1988). The impact of attributions in marriage: An experimental analysis. J. Social Clin. Psychol. 7: 147–162.
Finkelhor, D. (1983). Common features of family abuse. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.), The Dark Side of Families: Current Research on Family Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 17–28.
Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., and Polek, D. S. (1990). The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. J. Fam. Viol. 5: 107–120.
Gondolf, E. W. (1985). Men Who Batter: An Integrated Approach to Stopping Wife Abuse, Learning Publications, Holmes Beach, CA.
Hamberger, K. L. (1993, November). The function of aggression is different for men and women. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta, GA.
Kurtz, D. (1993). Physical assault by husbands: A major social problem. In Gelles, R. J., and Loseke, D. R. (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 88–103.
O'Leary, K. D. (1988). Physical aggression between spouses: A social learning theory perspective. In Van Hasselt, V. B., Morrison, R. L., Bellack, A. S., and Hersen, M. (eds.), Handbook of Family Violence, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 31–55.
O'Leary, K. D., and Jouriles, E. N. (1993). Psychological abuse between adult partners: Prevalence and effects on partners and children. In Abate, L. L. (ed.), Handbook of Developmental Family Psychology and Psychopathology, Wiley, New York.
Pan, H. S., Neidig, P., and O'Leary, K. D. (1994). Male-female and aggressor-victim differences in the factor structure of the Modified Conflict Tactics Scale. J. Interpers. Viol. 9: 366–382.
Rathus, J., and O'Leary, K. D. (1993, November). Attachment, spouse-specific dependency and use of control in maritally violent, discordant nonviolent and happily married men. Poster presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta, GA.
Rogers, L. E. (1972). Relational Communication Control Coding Manual. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University.
Rouse, L. (1990). The dominance motive in abusive partners: Identifying couples at risk. J. Coll. Stud. Devel. 31: 330–335.
Saunders, D. (1988). Wife abuse, husband abuse, or mutual combat? In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 90–113.
Stets, J. E. (1988). Domestic Violence and Control, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Stets, J. E. (1991). Psychological aggression in dating relationships: The role of interpersonal control. J. Marr. Fam. 6: 97–114.
Stets, J. E., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships. Social Psychol. Quart. 50: 237–246.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scale. J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.
Straus, M. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scale and its critics. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 49–74.
Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assault by husbands: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles, and Loseke, D. R. (eds.), Current Controversies on Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 67–87.
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor Press/Doubleday, New York.
Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Viol. Vict. 4: 159–177.
Tolman, R. M. (1992). Psychological abuse of women. In Campbell, J. (ed.), Assessing the Risk of Dangerousness, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 290–310.
Vivian, D., and Heyman, R. E. (1994, November). Aggression against wives: Mutual verbal combat ‘in context.’ Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, San Diego, CA.
Vivian, D., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1994). Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison. Viol. Vict. 9: 107–124.
Vivian, D., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., and Ayerle, C. (1995). Thematic Coding of Dyadic Interactions Manual, Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY.
Walker, L. E. (1981). The Battered Woman, Harper and Row, New York.
Warren, J., and Lanning, W. (1992) Sex role beliefs, control and social isolation of battered women. J. Fam. Viol. 7: 1–8.
Yllo, K. (1983). Using a feminist approach in quantitative research: A case study. In Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R. J., Hotaling, G. T., and Straus, M. A. (eds.), The Dark Side of Families Current Research on Family Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 277–288.
Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ehrensaft, M.K., Vivian, D. Is Partner Aggression Related to Appraisals of Coercive Control by a Partner?. Journal of Family Violence 14, 251–266 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022862332595
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022862332595