Abstract
This exploratory study examined several instructional characteristics of elementary classrooms serving students with severe disabilities including the individuals who provided instruction to students, the instructional behaviors of these teachers, and grouping structures. The analysis focused on the impact of these variables on the academic responding of students and the extent to which they were the exclusive target of instruction by the various teachers. Observation data were collected on six students with severe disabilities participating in general elementary classrooms for reading or math, and at least one other subject area. The academic responding of students was similar across general education teachers, special education teachers, paraprofessionals, and peers; and the instructional behaviors of each of these groups of instructors was similar. Students had higher rates of academic responding during one-on-one and small group instruction, but they also were engaged in instructional tasks during whole class instruction. Finally, academic responding was positively associated with instruction focused on the student, one-on-one instruction, and instructional interactions with teachers. Academic responding was negatively correlated with whole class instruction and instructional behaviors that were not directed at the student.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Bulgren, J. A., & Carta, J. J. (1993). Examining the instructional contexts of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 182–191.
Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Schwartz, I. S., & Miller, P. A. (1990). Code for instructional structure and student academic response: Mainstream Version (MS-CISSAR). Kansas City, KS: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Bureau of Child Research, University of Kansas.
Fantuzzo, J., & Atkins, M. (1992). Applied behavior analysis for educators: Teacher centered and classroom based. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 37–42.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.
Giangreco, M. F., & Putnam, J. (1991). Supporting the education of students with severe disabilities in regular education environments. In L. H. Meyer, C. A. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 245–270). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Greenwood, C. R., (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time engagement and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521–534.
Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D., & Delquadri, J. (1993). Ecobehavioral Assessment Systems Software: (EBASS). Lawrence, KA: University of Kansas.
Greenwood, C. R., & Delquadri, J., (1991). Code for instructional structure and student academic response (CISSAR). In M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), Dictionary of behavioral assessment (pp. 120–122). New York: Pergamon.
Greer, R. D. (1994). The measure of a teacher. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, J. and T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 161–173). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Halvorsen, A. T., & Sailor, W. (1990). Integration of students with severe and profound disabilities. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (pp. 110–172). New York: Teachers College Press.
Harper, G. F., Maheady, L., & Mallette, B. (1994). The power of peer-mediated instruction: How and why it promotes academic success for all students. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa, & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 229–242). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Hocut, A. M. (1996). Effectiveness of special education: Is placement the critical factor? The Future for Children: Special Education for Students with Disabilities, 6(1), 77–102.
Hollowood, T. M., Salisbury, C. L., Rainforth, B., & Palombaro, M. M. (1995). Use of instructional time in classrooms serving students with and without severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 242–254.
Hunt, P. Farron-Davis, Beckstead, S., Curits, D., & Goetz, L. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200–214.
Kamps, D. M., Leonard, B. R., Dugan, E. P. Boland, B., & Greenwood, C. R. (1991). The use of ecobehavioral assessment to identify naturally occurring effective procedures in classrooms serving children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 11, 367–397.
Kauffman, J. M. (1990) Restructuring in sociopolitical context: Reservations about the effects of current reform proposals on students with disabilities. In J. W. Lloyd, N. H. Singh, & A. C. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 57–66). Sycamore IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.
Logan, K. R., Bakeman, R., & Keefe, E. B. (1997). Effects of instructional variables on engaged behavior of students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 481–498.
Logan, K. R., & Keefe, E. B. (1997). A comparison of instructional context, teacher behavior, and engaged behavior for students with severe disabilities and general education and self-contained elementary classrooms. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 16–27.
McDonnell, J. (in press). Instruction for students with severe disabilities in general education settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities.
McDonnell, J., Thorson, N., McQuivey, C., & Kiefer-O'Donnell, R. (1997). The academic engaged time of students with low incidence disabilities in general education classes. Mental Retardation, 35, 18–26.
Meyer, L. H., Peck, C. A., & Brown, L. (1991). Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
National Association of School Board of Education (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. Alexandria, VA: NASBE Publications.
Peraino, J. M., (1992). Post-21 follow-up studies: How do special education graduates fare? In P. Wehman (Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (pp. 21–70). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3 rd ed.), (376–391). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Education for all: Contexts of learning. Lisle, France: Sets & Keitlinger Publishers.
Snell, M. E. (1990). Schools are for all kids: The importance of integration for students with severe disabilities and their peers. In J. W. Lloyd, N. N. Singh, and A. C. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 133–149). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.
Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., Graden, J., & Algozzine, B. (1983). What's “special” about the special education resource room for learning disabled students? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 6, 283–288.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDonnell, J., Thorson, N. & McQuivey, C. The Instructional Characteristics of Inclusive Classes for Elementary Students with Severe Disabilities: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Behavioral Education 8, 415–437 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022853231957
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022853231957