Skip to main content
Log in

The Instructional Characteristics of Inclusive Classes for Elementary Students with Severe Disabilities: An Exploratory Study

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory study examined several instructional characteristics of elementary classrooms serving students with severe disabilities including the individuals who provided instruction to students, the instructional behaviors of these teachers, and grouping structures. The analysis focused on the impact of these variables on the academic responding of students and the extent to which they were the exclusive target of instruction by the various teachers. Observation data were collected on six students with severe disabilities participating in general elementary classrooms for reading or math, and at least one other subject area. The academic responding of students was similar across general education teachers, special education teachers, paraprofessionals, and peers; and the instructional behaviors of each of these groups of instructors was similar. Students had higher rates of academic responding during one-on-one and small group instruction, but they also were engaged in instructional tasks during whole class instruction. Finally, academic responding was positively associated with instruction focused on the student, one-on-one instruction, and instructional interactions with teachers. Academic responding was negatively correlated with whole class instruction and instructional behaviors that were not directed at the student.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgren, J. A., & Carta, J. J. (1993). Examining the instructional contexts of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 182–191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carta, J. J., Greenwood, C. R., Schwartz, I. S., & Miller, P. A. (1990). Code for instructional structure and student academic response: Mainstream Version (MS-CISSAR). Kansas City, KS: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, Bureau of Child Research, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantuzzo, J., & Atkins, M. (1992). Applied behavior analysis for educators: Teacher centered and classroom based. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giangreco, M. F., & Putnam, J. (1991). Supporting the education of students with severe disabilities in regular education environments. In L. H. Meyer, C. A. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 245–270). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, C. R., (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time engagement and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521–534.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D., & Delquadri, J. (1993). Ecobehavioral Assessment Systems Software: (EBASS). Lawrence, KA: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, C. R., & Delquadri, J., (1991). Code for instructional structure and student academic response (CISSAR). In M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), Dictionary of behavioral assessment (pp. 120–122). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D. (1994). The measure of a teacher. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, J. and T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 161–173). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen, A. T., & Sailor, W. (1990). Integration of students with severe and profound disabilities. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (pp. 110–172). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. F., Maheady, L., & Mallette, B. (1994). The power of peer-mediated instruction: How and why it promotes academic success for all students. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa, & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 229–242). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocut, A. M. (1996). Effectiveness of special education: Is placement the critical factor? The Future for Children: Special Education for Students with Disabilities, 6(1), 77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollowood, T. M., Salisbury, C. L., Rainforth, B., & Palombaro, M. M. (1995). Use of instructional time in classrooms serving students with and without severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 242–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, P. Farron-Davis, Beckstead, S., Curits, D., & Goetz, L. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamps, D. M., Leonard, B. R., Dugan, E. P. Boland, B., & Greenwood, C. R. (1991). The use of ecobehavioral assessment to identify naturally occurring effective procedures in classrooms serving children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 11, 367–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, J. M. (1990) Restructuring in sociopolitical context: Reservations about the effects of current reform proposals on students with disabilities. In J. W. Lloyd, N. H. Singh, & A. C. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 57–66). Sycamore IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, K. R., Bakeman, R., & Keefe, E. B. (1997). Effects of instructional variables on engaged behavior of students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 481–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, K. R., & Keefe, E. B. (1997). A comparison of instructional context, teacher behavior, and engaged behavior for students with severe disabilities and general education and self-contained elementary classrooms. The Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, J. (in press). Instruction for students with severe disabilities in general education settings. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities.

  • McDonnell, J., Thorson, N., McQuivey, C., & Kiefer-O'Donnell, R. (1997). The academic engaged time of students with low incidence disabilities in general education classes. Mental Retardation, 35, 18–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. H., Peck, C. A., & Brown, L. (1991). Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of School Board of Education (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. Alexandria, VA: NASBE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peraino, J. M., (1992). Post-21 follow-up studies: How do special education graduates fare? In P. Wehman (Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (pp. 21–70). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3 rd ed.), (376–391). New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1996). Education for all: Contexts of learning. Lisle, France: Sets & Keitlinger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, M. E. (1990). Schools are for all kids: The importance of integration for students with severe disabilities and their peers. In J. W. Lloyd, N. N. Singh, and A. C. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 133–149). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., Graden, J., & Algozzine, B. (1983). What's “special” about the special education resource room for learning disabled students? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 6, 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDonnell, J., Thorson, N. & McQuivey, C. The Instructional Characteristics of Inclusive Classes for Elementary Students with Severe Disabilities: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Behavioral Education 8, 415–437 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022853231957

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022853231957

Navigation