Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Coordinated Community Intervention for Domestic Abusers: Intervention System Involvement and Criminal Recidivism

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined prosecution and post-prosecution elements of a coordinated community intervention approach to male perpetrators of adult domestic violence. In a sample of 235 cases, recidivism was assessed from official criminal justice data during a 12- to 18-month period after cases were initially handled by the Baltimore, Maryland State's Attorney's Domestic Violence Unit. Court orders for domestic violence counseling were associated with significantly lower criminal recidivism for battery or violation of a civil order of protection. Lower criminal recidivism was also associated with the cumulative effects of successful prosecution, probation monitoring, receiving a court order to counseling, attending counseling intake, and completion of counseling. Individuals with greater involvement in this intervention system had lower recidivism rates, even though offenders with more extensive abuse histories experienced more intervention. Results provide qualified support for coordinated community intervention for domestic violence perpetrators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., and Western, B. (1992). The differential deterrent effects of an arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of three randomized field experiments. Am. Sociological Rev. 57: 698–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltimore Domestic Violence Coordinating Committee (1992). Baltimore City Domestic Violence Summit Report.

  • Chen, H., Bersani, C., Myers, S. C., and Denton, R. (1989). Evaluating the effectiveness of a court sponsored abuser treatment program. J. Fam. Viol. 4: 309–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford, F. W. (1997, June). The research design and preliminary outcome findings of the San Diego Navy experiment, Presented at the Fifth International Family Violence Conference, Durham, NH.

  • Dunford, F. W., Huizinga, D., and Elliot, D. S. (1990). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha Police Experiment. Criminology 28: 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1986). The outcome of court-mandated treatment for wife assault: A quasi-experimental evaluation. Viol. Vict. 3: 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1995). The Domestic Assault of Women: Psychological and Criminal Justice Perspectives, Vancouver, British Columbia, UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edleson, J. L. (1991). Coordinated community responses to woman battering. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman Battering: Policy Responses, Anderson, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, A. (1991). Evaluation of Court-Ordered Treatment for Domestic Violence Offenders: Final Report, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, G. K., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Response of victims and the police to assaults on wives. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical Violence in American Families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 473–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. E., Brown, R. A., and Barrera, M. E. (1992). Group treatment program for abusive husbands: Long-term evaluation. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 62: 276–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence, E. (1983). The Duluth Domestic Abuse Intervention Project. Hamline Law Rev. 6: 247–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, B. D. (1992). Court-ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 12: 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., and Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. Am. Sociological Rev. 49: 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, M. (1988). Evaluating a system-wide response to domestic abuse: Some initial findings. J. Contemp. Crim. Just. 4: 172–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., and Gelles R. J. (eds.) (1990). Physical Violence in American Families. Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suitor, J. J., Pillemer, K., and Straus, M. A. (1990). Marital violence in life course perspective. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (eds.), Physical violence in American families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syers, M. A., and Edleson, J. L. (1992). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justice intervention in woman abuse. J. Interpers. Viol. 7: 490–502.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Christopher M. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter H. Musser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenneth I. Maton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, C.M., Musser, P.H. & Maton, K.I. Coordinated Community Intervention for Domestic Abusers: Intervention System Involvement and Criminal Recidivism. Journal of Family Violence 13, 263–284 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022841022524

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022841022524

Search

Navigation