Skip to main content
Log in

Integrating Minuchin's Boundary Continuum And Bowen's Differentiation Scale: A Curvilinear Representation

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to discuss an integration of Minuchin's boundary continuum and Bowen's differentiation scale. Minuchin's boundary continuum provides a framework for understanding proximity and distance within relationships. It graphically depicts health in relationships as being a dynamic middle ground between the extremes of enmeshment and disengagement. Bowen's differentiation scale illustrates differences in emotional health, such as the ability to distinguish between thoughts and feelings, associated with varying levels of differentiation. A curvilinear integration of Minuchin's continuum and Bowen's scale retains the advantages of each and also expands their understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bowen, M. (1976). Theory in the practice of psychotherapy. In P. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 42–90). New York: Gardner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. H., & Harvey, D. M. (1992). Intimacy and individuation in young adults: Development of the young adult version of the personal authority in the family system questionnaire. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. H., Williamson, D. S., & Malone, P. E. (1986). An evaluation of an intergenerational consultation process to increase personal authority in the family system. Family Process, 25, 423–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (Eds.). (1989). The changing family life cycle: A framework for family therapy (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B. (1982). Dysfunctional marital conflict: An integrative interpersonal-intrapsychic model. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 8, 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Framo, J. L. (1981). The integration of marital therapy with sessions with family of origin. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 133–158). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, L. (1983). Projective identification in dyads and groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 33, 254–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M. E., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation: An approach based on Bowen theory. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, H. G. (1985). The dance of anger. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, M. (1987). Intimate partners: Patterns in love and marriage. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo, M., & Harman, M. J. (1993). Relationship enhancement therapy with borderline personality. The Family Journal, 1, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D. S., & Bray, J. H. (1988). Family development and change across the generations: An intergenerational perspective. In C. J. Falicov (Ed.), Family transitions: Continuity and change over the life cycle (pp. 357–384). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, P., Waldo, M. Integrating Minuchin's Boundary Continuum And Bowen's Differentiation Scale: A Curvilinear Representation. Contemporary Family Therapy 20, 403–413 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022429332033

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022429332033

Navigation