Skip to main content
Log in

Fairness and Health Care Decision Making: Testing the Group Value Model of Procedural Justice

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considerable research has supported the notion that procedural justice is important to individuals independent of outcome considerations. Tyler and his associates (Lind and Tyler, 1988; Lind and Earley, 1992; Tyler, 1989) proposed that this is so because procedural justice serves a group value function. In the present research, we explored aspects of this group value formulation in a real life health care context. Specifically, we assessed the relationship between individuals' appraisals of procedural justice following health care treatment decisions as well as (i) expectations for different consequences to self; (ii) estimates of how they were viewed by the health care authorities; (iii) attributions about the reasons for their treatment; and (iv) ratings of emotional reactions. Results confirmed many components of the relational, group value model of procedural justice (Lind and Tyler, 1988; Lind and Earley, 1992; Tyler, 1989). Specifically, respondents who felt that they had been treated fairly expected that their status and their relationship with the health care decision maker and others in their health care group would improve; perceived that the health care decision maker would rate them positively on a variety of personality dimensions; felt that the health care decision maker's interactions with them revealed quite a lot about the decision-maker's personality characteristics; and indicated increased levels of pride and pleasure as well as lower levels of anger as a result of their treatment. Results were discussed from several frameworks including Markus and Kitayama's (1991) concept of the independent and the interdependent self.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Berman, J., and Murphy-Berman, V. (1996). Cultural differences in perceptions of allocators of resources. J Cross-cult. Psychol. 27: 494-509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondacaro, M., Dunkle, M., and Pathak, M. (1998). Procedural justice in resolving family disputes: An analysis of individual and family functioning in late adolescence. J. Youth Adoles. 27: 101-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondacaro, M., and Heller, K. (1990). Attributional style in aggressive adolescent boys. J. Abnormal Child Psychol. 18: 75-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., and Morris, M. (1996). Justice through the lens of culture and ethnicity. In Sauders, J., and Hamilton, V.L. (eds.), Handbook of Law and Social Science, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Earley, P. C. (1992). Procedural justice and culture. Int'l J. Psychol. 27: 227-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., and Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and maturation. Psychol. Bull. 98: 224-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., and Costa, P. T. (1986). Clinical assessment can benefit from recent advances in personality psychology. Am. Psychologist 41: 1001-1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T. (1981). Self-presentation and distributive justice. In Tedeschi, J. T. (ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research, Academic Press, New York. pp. 269-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T. (1987). The nature of the justice motive. In Masters, J. C., and Smith, W. P. (eds.), Social comparison, social justice and relative deprivation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57: 830-838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 850-863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., and Beis, R. (1990). Interpersonal aspects of procedural justice. In Carroll, J. S. (ed.), Applied social psychology in business settings, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 77-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R., Smith, H., and Huo, Y. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T., and Degoey, P. (1995). Community, family, and the social good: The psychological dynamics of procedural justice and social identification. In Melton, G. B. (ed.), The individual, the family, and social good: Personal fulfillment in times of change, vol. 42, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 53-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 115-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, J., Rothbaum, F., and Blackburn, T. (1984). Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan. Am. Psychologist 39: 955-969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy-Berman, V., Cross, T. & Fondacaro, M. Fairness and Health Care Decision Making: Testing the Group Value Model of Procedural Justice. Social Justice Research 12, 117–129 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022095809955

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022095809955

Keywords

Navigation