Abstract
Objective: We examined social disparities in unintended pregnancy among postpartum women to better understand 1) the role of socioeconomic factors in racial/ethnic disparities and 2) factors that might explain both socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in the risk for unintended pregnancy among women who give birth. Methods: We used 1999 and 2000 data from a statewide-representative mail and telephone survey of postpartum women in California (N = 7044). We examined associations between unintended pregnancy and race/ethnicity (African American, Asian or Pacific Islander, U.S.-born Latina, foreign-born Latina, European or Middle Eastern), three socioeconomic factors (poverty status, maternal education, paternal education), and several potential explanatory factors. Results: Overall, racial/ethnic disparities in unintended pregnancy were reduced by the three socioeconomic factors individually and collectively (e.g., reducing higher unadjusted odds for African Americans from 3.4 to 1.9); additional adjustment for marital status age, parity, insurance, language, abuse, sense of control, and interaction between marital status and race/ethnicity (each independently associated with unintended pregnancy) reduced the socioeconomic disparities (e.g., reducing odds for the poorest women from 4.1 to 2.3). Although reduced, significant racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities remained after adjustment, but generally only among married women. Results for Latinas appeared to vary by nativity, with foreign-born Latinas being at lower odds and U.S.-born Latinas being at higher odds of unintended pregnancy. Conclusions: Racial/ethnic disparities in unintended pregnancy are partly explained by the socioeconomic factors we measured. Several additional factors were identified that suggest possible directions for policies and programs to help reduce social disparities in unintended pregnancy among childbearing women.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Institute of Medicine. The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families.Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.
Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:24–9, 46.
Kost K, Landry DJ, Darroch JE. The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:223–30.
Marsiglio W, Mott FL. Does wanting to become pregnant with a first child affect the subsequent maternal behaviors and infant birth weight? J Marriage Fam 1988;50:1023–36.
Gazmararian JA, Adams MM, Saltzman LE, Johnson CH, Bruce FC, Marks JS, Zahniser SC. The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:1031–8.
Goodwin MM, Gazmararian JA, Johnson CH, Gilbert BC, Saltzman LE. Pregnancy intendedness and physical abuse around the time of pregnancy: Findings from the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 1996–1997. Mater Child Health J 2000;4:85–92.
Dietz PM, Spitz AM, Anda RF, Williamson DF, Mcmahon PM, Santelli JS, Nordenberg DF, Felitti VJ, Kendrick JS. Unintended pregnancy among adult women exposed to abuse or household dysfunction during their childhood. JAMA 1999;282:1359–64.
Joyce TJ, Kaestner R, Korenman S. The stability of pregnancy intentions and pregnancy-related maternal behaviors. Mater Child Health J 2000;4:171–8.
Pulley L, Klerman LV, Tang H, Baker BA. The extent of pregnancy mistiming and its association with maternal characteristics and behaviors and pregnancy outcomes Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002;Jul-Aug;34(4):206–11.
Altfeld SA, Handler A, Burton D, Berman L. Wantedness of pregnancy and prenatal health behaviors. Women Health 1997;26:29–43.
Hellerstedt WL, Pirie PL, Lando HA, Curry SJ, McBride CH, Gvothaus LC, Nelson JC. Differences in preconceptional and prenatal behaviors in women with intended and unintended pregnancies. Am J Public Health 1998;88:663–6.
Adams MM, Bruce FC, Shulman HB, Kendrick JS, Brogan DJ. Pregnancy planning and pre-conception counseling. The PRAMS Working Group. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:955–9.
Hulsey TM. Association between early prenatal care and mother's intention of and desire for the pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2001;30:275–82.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Entry Into Prenatal Care-United States, 1989–1997. MMWR 2000;49:393–8.
Gazmararian JA, Adams MM, Pamuk ER. Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and maternal health behavior. Am J Prev Med 1996;12:108–15.
Williams LB. Determinants of unintended childbearing among ever-married women in the United States: 1973–1988. Fam Plann Perspect 1991;23:212–5, 221.
Kost K, Forrest JD. Intention status of U.S. births in 1998: Differences by mothers' socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. Fam Plann Perspect 1995;27:11–7.
Forrest JD. Epidemiology of unintended pregnancy and contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:1485–9.
Pearlin LI, Lieberman MA, Menaghan EG, Mullan JT. The stress process. J Health Soc Behav 1981;22:337–56.
SAS Institute, Inc. SAS. Release 8.02. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1999.
Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN software for statistical analysis of correlated data. release 8.0. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute, 2001.
Bennett T, Braveman P, Egerter S, Kiely JL. Maternal marital status as a risk factor for infant mortality. Fam Plann Perspect 1994;26:252–6.
Cramer JC. Social factors and infant mortality: Identifying high-risk groups and proximate causes. Demography 1987;24:299–322.
Abel MH. Low birth weight and interactions between traditional risk factors. J Genet Psychol 1997;158:443–56.
Fuentes-Afflick E, Lurie P. Low birth weight and Latino ethnicity: Examining the epidemiologic paradox. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1997;151:665–74.
MacDorman MF, Pastore LM. Infant mortality by Hispanic origin of Mother: 20 states, 1985–86 birth cohorts. Reviews of New Reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics, Series 20, No. 27, PHS 95–1855.
Crane J. The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. AJS 1991;96:1226–59.
Brewster KL. Race difference in sexual activity among adolescent women: The role of neighborhood characteristics. Am Sociol Rev 1994;59:408–24.
Adetunji JA. Unintended childbearing in developing countries: Levels, trends, and determinants. Demographic and Health Surveys Analytical Report No. 8. Macro International, Calverton, MD, June 1998.
Kaufman JS, Cooper RS, McGee DL. Socioeconomic status and health in blacks and whites: The problem of residual confounding and the resiliency of race. Epidemiology 1997;8:609–11.
Lewis SK, Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Establishing a sense of personal control in the transition to adulthood. Soc Forces 1999;77:1573–99.
Bankole A, Darroch JE, Singh S. Determinants of trends in condom use in the United States, 1988–1995. Fam Plann Perspect 1999;31:264–71.
Mosher WD, McNally JW. Contraceptive use at first premarital intercourse: United States, 1965–1988. Fam Plann Perspect 1991;23:108–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cubbin, C., Braveman, P.A., Marchi, K.S. et al. Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Unintended Pregnancy Among Postpartum Women in California. Matern Child Health J 6, 237–246 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021158016268
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021158016268