Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Differences in Interest and Knowledge Acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between interest and knowledge was investigated in a representative sample of 11th grade students from cultures that differ in the strength of their gender-role stereotypes and their endorsement of effort-based versus interest-based learning. Among 11th graders from the United States (N = 1052), Taiwan (N = 1475), and Japan (N = 1119), boys preferred science, math, and sports, whereas girls preferred language arts, music, and art. General information scores were comparable across the three locations; however, boys consistently outscored girls. Gender and interest in science independently predicted general information scores, whereas gender and interest in math independently predicted mathematics scores. Cultural variations in the strength of the relationship between gender, interest, and scores indicate that specific socialization practices can minimize or exaggerate these gender differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (1996). The 1991 International Assessment of Educational Progress in Mathematics and Sciences: The gender differences perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 365-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (2000). Can item format (multiple choice vs. open-ended) account for gender differences in mathematics achievement? Sex Roles, 42, 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66, 1215-1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1993). Cognitive gender differences: A developmental perspective. Sex Roles, 29, 91-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. (1996). Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 229-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. S. (1921). Aspects of child life and education. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 52, 1091-1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. D., & Azuma, H. (1991). Cultural support for schooling: Contrasts between Japan and the United States. Educational Researcher, 20(9), 2-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D. (1988). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1996). Gender stereotypes and partner preference of Asian women in masculine and feminine cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 533-5446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1989). Gender, mathematics, and science. Educational Researcher, 18, 17-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the mathscience pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Abroadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence, 14, 327-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., et al. (1998). Mathematics and science achievement in the final year of secondary school: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Boston, MA: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagpaul, P. S. (2001). Guide to advanced data analysis using IDAMS software [on-line]. Retrieved from www. un-esco. org/webworld/idams/advguide/TOC.htm.

  • Pintrich, P. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (Vol. 6, pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D., & Finn, C. E. (1988). What do our 17-year-olds know? New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. (1993). Males and females who reason well mathematically. In G. R. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability (pp. 119-134). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 211-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, L. C. (1997). International achievement differences: An assessment of a new perspective. Educational Researcher, 26, 4-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C., & Lee, S.-Y. (1993). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children: Ten years later. Science, 259, 53-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W., & Lee, S.-Y. (1997). Anexamination of American student achievement from an international perspective. In D. Ravitch (Eds.), The state of student scores in American schools (pp. 7-52). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, H., & Stanley, J. C. (1999). Stability and change in gender-related differences on the College Board Advanced Placement and achievement tests. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 192-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., Satterwhite, R. C., & Best, D. L. (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited: The five factor model. Sex Roles, 40, 513-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, W. W., & Cole, N. S. (1997). Gender and fair assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, E.M., Schweingruber, H. & Stevenson, H.W. Gender Differences in Interest and Knowledge Acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan. Sex Roles 47, 153–167 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021047122532

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021047122532

Navigation