Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lack of Objective Evidence of Efficacy of Laxatives in Chronic Constipation

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laxatives are commonly used to treat constipation and can be bought over-the-counter in many countries, although some preparations need to be prescribed by physicians. A meta-analysis was conducted to quantitatively evaluate the published evidence on the efficacy of laxatives in constipation. We found that large, well-controlled, published studies whose data were comparable were lacking. Of 250 articles, 35 met the inclusion criteria but only 11 yielded usable data (N = 375 patients on laxatives, 174 on placebo). There was an effect of laxatives on stool frequency (mean increase 1.9 stools per week) and stool weight (mean increase 476 g) but this was not clearly distinguishable from that of placebo therapies (1 stool and 434 g, respectively) in studies up to 4 weeks in duration. Similarly, studies of 5–12 weeks yielded no differences overall. These results cannot definitively rule out laxatives as an effective treatment, due to the poor published evidence. Better evidence is required to justify the continued expenditure of funds on laxatives by both patients and formularies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Thompson WG, Heaton KW: Functional bowel disorders in apparently healthy people. Gastroenterology 79:283–288, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. Talley NJ, Weaver AL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ: Onset and disappearance of gastrointestinal symptoms and functional gastrointestinal disorders. Am J Epidemiol 136:165–177, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Talley NJ, Thompson WS, Whitehead WE: Rome II. The functional gastrointestinal disorders. 2nd ed. Degnon Associates. McLean, Virginia, pp 382–391

  4. Petticrew M, Watt I, Brand M: What's the ‘best buy’ for treatment of constipation? Results of a systematic review of the efficacy and comparative efficacy of laxatives in the elderly. Br J Gen Pract 49:387–393, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tramonte SM, Brand MB, Mulrow CD, Arnato MG, O'Keefe ME: The treatment of chronic constipation in adults–a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 12:15–24, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen J: Possible effects of laxatives on the nerve plexuses of the colon. In MA Kamm, JE Lennard-Jones (eds). Constipation. London Wrightson Biomedical Publishing, 1994, pp 321–326

    Google Scholar 

  7. DerSimmonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ashraf W, Park F, Lof J, Quigley EMM: Effects of psyllium therapy on stool characteristics, colon transit and anorectal function in chronic idiopathic constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 9:639–647, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  9. Badiali D, Corazziari E, Habib FI, Tomei E, Bausano G, Magrini P, Anzini F, Torsoli A: Effect of wheat bran in treatment of chronic nonorganic constipation. A double blind controlled trial. Dig Dis Sci 40:349–356, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castle SC, Cantrell M, Israel D, Samuelson MJ: Constipation prevention: empiric use of stool softeners questioned. Geriatrics 46:84–86, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chokhavatia S, Phipps T, Anura, S: Comparative laxation of calcium polycarbophil with psyllium mucilloid in an ambulatory geriatric population. Curr Ther Res 44:1013–1019, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fain AM, Susat R, Herring M, Dorton K: Treatment of constipation in geriatric and chronically ill patients: a comparison. South Med J 71:677–680, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kinnunen O, Winblad I, Koistinen P, Salokannel J: Safety and efficacy of a bulk laxative containing senna versus lactulose in the treatment of chronic constipation in geriatric patients. Pharmacology 47(suppl 1):253–255, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  14. Odes HS, Madar Z: A double blind trial of a Celandin, aloe vera and psyllium laxative preparation in adult patients with constipation. Digestion 49:65–71, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marlett JA, Li BUK, Patrow CJ, Bass P: Comparative laxation of psyllium with and without senna in an ambulatory constipated population. Am J Gastroenterol 82:333–337, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  16. Passmore AP, Wilson-Davies K, Flanagan PG, Stoker C, Scott MG: A comparison of agiolax and lactulose in elderly patients with chronic constipation. Pharmacology 47(suppl 1):249–252, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  17. Passmore AP, Wilson-Davies K, Stoker C, Scott ME: Chronic constipation in long stay elderly patients: a comparison of lactulose and a senna-fibre combination. BMJ 307:769–771, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rajala SA, Salminen SJ, Seppanen JH, Vapaatalo H: Treatment of chronic constipation with lactitol sweetened yoghurt supplemented with guar gum and wheat bran in elderly hospital inpatients. Compr Gerontol A 2:83–86, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sanders JF: Lactulose syrup assessed in a double blind study of elderly constipated patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 26:236–239, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  20. Agra Y, Sacristan A, Gonzalez M, Ferrari M, Portugues A, Calvo MJ: Efficacy of senna versus lactulose in terminal cancer patients treated with opioids. J Pain Sympt Manage 15:1–7, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bass P, Clark C, DoPico GA: Comparison of the laxative efficacy and patient preference of calcium polycarbophil and psyllium suspension. Curr Ther Res 43:770–774, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bass P, Dennis S: The laxative effects of lactulose in normal and constipated subjects. Clin Gastroenterol 3(suppl 1):23–28, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  23. Borgia M, Sepe N, Brancato V, Costa G, Simone P, Borgia R, Lugli R: Treatment of chronic constipation by a bulk forming laxative (Fibrolax). J Int Med Res 11:124–127, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cheskin LJ, Kamal N, Crowell MD, Schuster MM, Whitehead WE: Mechanisms of constipation in older persons and effects of fiber compared with placebo. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:666–669, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  25. Connolly P, Hughes IW, Ryan G: Comparison of ‘Duphalac’ and irritant laxatives during and after treatment of chronic constipation: a preliminary study. Curr Med Res Opin 2:620–625, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  26. Corazziari E, Badiali D, Habib FI, Reboa G, Pitto G, Mazzacca G, Sabbatini F, Galeazzi R, Cilluffo T, Vantini I, Bardelli E, Baldi F: Small volume isosmotic polyethylene glycol electrolyte balanced solution (PMF-100) in treatment of chronic nonorganic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 41:1636–1642, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ewerth S, Ahlberg J, Holmstrom B, Persson U, Uden R: Influence on symptoms and transit-time of Vi-siblinR in diverticular disease. Acta Chir Scand 500:49–50, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  28. Finlay M: The use of dietary fibre in a long-stay geriatric ward. J Nutr Elderly 8:19–30, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  29. Freedman MD, Schwartz J, Roby R, Fleisher S: Tolerance and efficacy of polyethylene glycol 3350/electrolyte solution versus lactulose in relieving opiate induced constipation: a doubleblinded placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Pharmacol 37:904–907, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goovaerts L, Ravelli GP: Lactitol monohydrate for the treatment of chronic constipation. A multicentre study on the efficacy and tolerability of an individually adjusted daily dose. Acta Ther 19:61–71, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  31. Griffenberg L, Morris M, Atkinson N, Levenback C: The effect of dietary fiber on bowel function following radical hysterectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Gynaecol Oncol 66:417–424, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hamilton JW, Wagner J, Burdick B, Bass P: Clinical evaluation of methylcellulose as a bulk laxative. Dig Dis Sci 33:993–998, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  33. House JG, Steins SA: Pharmacologically initiated defecation for persons with spinal cord injury: effectiveness of three agents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:1062–1065, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kochen MM, Wegscheider K, Abholz H: Prophylaxis of constipation by wheat bran: A randomized study in hospitalized patients. Digestion 31:220–224, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lederle FA, Busch DL, Mattox KM, West MJ, Aske DM: Cost-effective treatment of constipation in the elderly: a randomized double-blind comparison of sorbitol and lactulose. Am J Med 89:597–601, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mantle J: Research and serendipitous secondary findings. Can Nurse 88:15–18, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  37. Odes HS, Lazvoski H, Stern I, Madar Z: Double blind trial of a high dietary fiber, mixed grain cereal in patients with chronic constipation and hyperlipidemia. Nutr Res 13:979–985, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  38. Perkin JM: Constipation in childhood: a controlled comparison between lactulose and standardized senna. Curr Med Res Opin 4:540–543, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pers M, Pers B: A crossover comparative study with two bulk laxatives. J Int Med Res 11:51–53, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ravelli GP, Whyte A, Spencer R, Hotten P, Harbron C, Keenan R: The effect of lactitol intake upon stool parameters and the faecal bacterial flora in chronically constipated women. Acta Ther 21:243–255, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rouse M, Chapman N, Mahapatra M, Grillage M, Atkinson SN, Prescott P: An open, randomised, parallel group study of lactulose versus ispaghula in the treatment of chronic constipation in adults. Br J Clin Pract 45:28–30, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  42. Soffer EE, Metcalf A, Launspach J: Misoprostol is effective treatment for patients with severe chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 39:929–933, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sutphen JL, Borowitz SM, Hutchison RL, Cox DJ: Long term follow up of medically treated childhood constipation. Clin Pediatr 34:576–580, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vanderdonckt J, Coulon J, Denys W, Ravelli GP: Study of the laxative effect of lacitol (importal®) in an elderly institutionalized, but not bedridden, population suffering from chronic constipation. J Clin Exp Gerontol 12:171–189, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  45. Verne CN, Eaker EY, Davis RH, Sninsky CA: Colchine is an effective treatment for patients with chronic constipation. An open label trial. Dig Dis Sci 42:1959–1963, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  46. Voderholzer WA, Schatke W, Muhldorfer BE, Klauser AG, Birkner B, Muller-Lissner SA: Clinical response to dietary fiber treatment of chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 92:95–98, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wesselius-de Casparis A, Braadbaart S, Bergh-Bohlken GE, Mimica M: Treatment of chronic constipation with lactulose syrup: results of a double-blind study. Gut 9:84–86, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wald A: Constipation. Med Clin North Am 84:1231–1246, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  49. Corazziari E: Need of the ideal drug for the treatment of chronic constipation. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31(suppl 3):S232–S233, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hurdon V, Viola R, Schroder C: How useful is docusate in patients at risk for constipation? A systematic review of the evidence in the chronically ill. J Pain Symptom Manage 19:130–136, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  51. Agra Y, Sacristan A, Gonzalez M, Ferrari M, Portugues A, Calvo MJ: Efficacy of senna versus lactulose in terminal cancer patients treated with opioids. J Pain Symptom Manage 1:1–7, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  52. Koloski NA, Talley NJ, Boyce PM: The impact of functional gastrointestinal disorders on quality of life. Am J Gastroenterol 95:67–71, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kiernan JA, Heinicke EA: Sennosides do not kill myenteric neurons in the colon of the rat or mouse. Neuroscience 30:837–842, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nusko G, Schneider B, Schneider I, Wittekind C, Hahn E: Anthranoid laxative use is not a risk factor for colorectal neoplasia: results of a prospective case control study. Gut 46:651–655, 2000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Michael P. Jones & Nicholas J. Talley

  2. Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium

    Guy Nuyts & Dominique Dubois

Authors
  1. Michael P. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas J. Talley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guy Nuyts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dominique Dubois
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, M.P., Talley, N.J., Nuyts, G. et al. Lack of Objective Evidence of Efficacy of Laxatives in Chronic Constipation. Dig Dis Sci 47, 2222–2230 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020131126397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020131126397

Search

Navigation