Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender and Sexual Risk

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two hypotheses are evaluated in thisinvestigation of gender differences in the attitudinaland behavioral correlates of sexual risk. The“difference in magnitude” hypothesispredicts that the same factors are implicated for women and men butdifferences occur in the strength of correlates.Alternatively, women may engage in sexual risk fordifferent reasons than do men, leading to a“difference in pattern” hypothesis. We compared these possibilitieswith a sample of 576 primarily White, middle-class,never-married college students, most of whom werebetween 17 and 25 years of age. Analyses of loveattitudes, risk perception, sensation seeking, and riskbehaviors in other domains in relation to sexual riskbehavior showed some gender similarities as well asdifferences. Findings were more consistent with the difference in pattern hypothesis than with thedifference in magnitude hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aiken, L. S., & We st, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpretin g interactio ns. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. R., Bell, N. J., Fische r, J. L., Munsch, J., Peek, C. W., & Sorell, G. T. (1993). Applying a risk-taking perspe ctive. In N. J. Be ll & R. W. Bell (Eds.), Adolescent risk taking (pp. 165–185). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. (1992). Re ckless behavior in adolescence: A deve lopmental perspe ctive. Develop-men tal Review, 12, 339–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. (1994). Sensation se ekiing: A new conceptualization and a new scale. Person ality an d Individual Differences, 16, 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. (1996). Sensation se eking, aggre ssiveness, and adolescent reckless behavior. Person-ality an d Individual Differences, 20, 693–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Humphrey, R. H. (1988). Exploring the recent decline in marijuana use: Differentiating the e ffects of perceive d risks, disapproval, and general lifestyle factors. Jou rnal of Health an d Social Behavior, 29, 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartusch, D. J., & Matsueda, R. L. (1996). Gende r, re ¯ e cted appraisals, and labe ling: A crossgroup test of an interactionist theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 75, 145–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberge r, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthin, A. C., Slovic, P., & Severson, H. H. (1993). A psychometric study of adolescent risk perception. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 153–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benthin,A., Slovic, P., Moran, P., Severson, H., Mertz, C.K., & Gerrard, M. (1995).Adolescent health-threatening and health-enhancing behaviors; A study of word association image ry. Journ al of Adolescen t Health, 17, 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, R. J. (1989). Female delinquency in the emancipation e ra: A re view of the literature. Sex Roles, 21, 375–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettor, L, Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1995). Gender and sexual standards in dating relationships. Perso nal Relationships, 2, 359–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, P. D., & Lipsitz, A. (1991). Sexual behavior among college students in the AIDS e ra: A comparative study. Jo urn al of Psycholo gy and Human Sexuality, 3, 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottcher, J. (1995). Gende r as social control. Justice Quarterly, 12, 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, J. S., Cohen, P., & Jaeger, L. (1998). De ve lopmental variations in factors related to initial and increased leve ls of adolescent drug involvement. Journ al of G en etic Psych ology, 159, 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks-Gunn, J., & Furstenberg, F. F. (1989).Adolescent sexual behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne s, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gende r differences in risk taking: a me ta-analysis. Psycho logical Bulletin, 125, 367–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. (1988). Women, crime and poverty. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney-Lind,M. (1989). Girls' crime and woman' s place: Toward a feminist model of female delinquency. Crime & Delinqu ency, 35, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Mode ls of the se lf: Self-construals and gender. Psych ological Bulletin, 122, 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1994). G en der, crime an d pun ishmen t. New Haven, CT: Yale Unive rsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1998). Gende r, crime, and criminology. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The hand bo ok of crime & punishmen t (pp. 85–108). New York: Oxford Unive rsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A., & Smith, T. W. (1988). General social surveys, 1972–1988: Cumulative co debo ok. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, National Opinion Re search Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLamater, J. (1987). Gende r difference s in sexual scenarios. In K. Kelly (Ed.), Females, males, and sexu ality. Albany: State Unive rsity of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. E., & Jessor, R. (1985). Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Journ al of Consu lting and Clinical Psych ology, 53, 890–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. E., Jessor, R., & Costa, F. M. (1988). Syndrome of problem behavior in adolescence: A replication. Jo urn al of Consulting and Clinical Psycho logy, 56, 762–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, K. A., Collins, J. L., Warren, C., Kann, L., Gold, R., Clayton, S., Ross, J. G., & Kolbe, L. J. (1997). Results from the 1995 national college health risk behavior surve y. Journ al of American College Health, 46, 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in so cial beh avior: A social-role interpretatio n. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. (1962). De linquency and perce ived opportunity. Socio logical Inq uiry, 32, 216–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinqu en cy, sub stance use, and mental health prob lems.New York: Springer-Ve rlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensminger, M. E. (1990). Sexual activity and problem behaviors among Black, urban adolescents. Child Developmen t, 61, 2032–2046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, S. L., Read, N. W., & Millstein, S. G. (1997). Adolescent sexual strate gie s. Jou rn al of Ado lescent Health, 20, 286–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forthun, L. F., Be ll, N. J., Pe ek, C. W., & Sun, S.-W. (1999). Re ligiosity, sensation se eking, and alcohol/drug use in denominational and gender contexts. Journ al of Drug Issues, 29, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan, R. F., & Terry, D. J. (1993). Romantic ideals, fear of negative implications, and the practice of safe se x. Jo urn al of Applied Social Psycho logy, 23, 1685–1711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Benthin, A. C., & Hessling, R. M. (1996). A longitudinal study of the re ciprocal nature of risk behaviors and cognitions in adolescents: What you do shape s what you think, and vice ve rsa. Health Psycho logy, 15, 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psych ological theo ry an d women' s development. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Unive rsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H. G., Hagan, J., Blackwe ll, B. S., & Arneklev, B. J. (1996). Risk preference s and patriarchy: Extending power control theory. Social Forces, 75, 177–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griscom, J. L. (1992). Women and power. Psycho logy of Women Quarterly, 16, 389–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, K. (1996). Gender, interaction, and delinquency: Te sting a theory of differential social control. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, S., & Hendrick, C. (1987). Multidimensionality of sexual attitudes. The Jou rnal of Sex Research, 23, 502–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1995). Gender difference s and similarities in sex and love. Pe rsonal Re lationships, 2, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S., Foote, F. H., & Slapion-Foote, M. (1984). Do men and women love differently? Jo urn al of Social and Perso nal Relationships, 1, 177–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, L., Harrison, L., & Warr, D. (1998). ``When you carry condoms all the boys think you want it'': Negotiating competing discourses about safe sex. Journal of Adolescence, 21, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquen cy. Be rkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). Attending to, codifying and managing fee lings: Sex difference s in love. In L. Richardson & V. Taylor (Eds.), Feminist frontiers: Rethinking sex, gender, an d so ciety (pp. 250–262). New York: Addison-We sley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A. V., & White, H. R. (1987). Gender role orientation and styles of pathology among adolescents. Jou rnal of Health an d Social Behavior, 28, 158–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynie, M., Lydon, J. E., Cote, S., & Wiener, S. (1998). Relational sexual scripts and women' s condom use: The importance of internalized norms. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 370–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. F., & Eve, R. (1976).Sex difference s in delinquency: An examination of popular sociological explanations. Criminology, 13, 427–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, G. F., Erickson, M., & Gibbs, J. (1978). Pe rceive d risk of punishment and se lf-reported delinquency. Social Forces, 57, 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jone s, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The acto r and the observer: Divergen t percep tions of the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T. (1989). Bridging social psychology and sociobiology: The case of sexual attraction. In R. W. Bell & N.J. Be ll (Eds.), Sociobiology and the so cial sciences (pp. 5–23). Lubbock: Texas Te ch Unive rsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke tterlinus, R. D., Lamb, M. E., Nitz, K., & Elster, A. B. (1992). Adolescent nonsexual and sex-related problem behaviors. Journ al of Adolescen t Research, 7, 431–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koita, K., & Triplett, R. A. (1998). An examination of gender and race effects on the parental appraisal proce ss. Criminal Ju stice an d Behavior, 25, 382–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organ ization of sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Pre ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. A. (1973). The co lor of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Don Mills, Ontario: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, S. (1993). Sugar an d spice; Sexuality and ad olescent girls. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, B. C. (1989). Re asons for having and avoiding sex: Gende r, sexual orientation, and relationship to sexual behavior. Jou rnal of Sex Research, 26, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, C. (1997). The culture of ado lescen t risk-taking. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lottes, I. L. (1993). Nontraditional gender roles and the sexual expe riences of heterosexual college students. Sex Roles, 29, 645–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, K., & Pastore, A. L. (Eds.). (1997). Sou rceb ook of criminal justice statistics.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxim, P. S., & Keane, C. (1992). Gender, age, and the risk of violent death in Canada, 1950–1986. Canad ian Review of Sociology and Anthropo logy, 29, 329–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, C. S., Chuansheng, C., Greenberger, E., & Biermeier, C. (1997). Jou rnal of Research on Ado lescence, 733–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, L. D., Carte r, J. A., & Williams, M. K. (1998). Self-esteem, gender, and alcohol use: Relationships with HIV risk perception and behaviors in college students. Jou rnal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 24, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, C. W., Noell, J., & Biglan, A. (1992). The valuation of a construct of high-risk sexual behavior in heterosexual adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, C. W., Noell, J., Biglan, A., Ary, D., & Smolkowski, K. (1994). The social context for risky sexual behavior among adolescents. Jo urnal of BehavioralMed icine, 17, 419–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. M., & Rosenthal, D. A. (199l). Condoms and coitus; Adolescents attitudes to AIDS and safe sex behavior. Jo urn al of Adolescen ce, 14, 211–227.

  • Moore, S. M., & Rosenthal, D. A. (1998). Contemporary youths' negotiations of romance, love, se x, and sexual disease. InV. C. deMunck (Ed.), Romantic love and sex al behavior (pp. 233–247). Westport, CT: Praege r.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I., & Mercy, T. (1994). Sex, drugs, re lationships, contraception, and fears of disease on a college campus over 17 ye ars. Adolescence, 29, 303–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I., & Tuerkheimer, A. (1998). Gende r difference s in love, sex, and motivation for se x. Psych ological Repo rts, 82, 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novacek, J., Raskin, R., & Hogan, R. (1991). Why do adolescents use drugs? Age, sex, and user differences. Journ al of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M.B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993).Gender differences in sexuality:A meta-analysis. Psycho logical Bulletin, 114, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 53, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppen, P. J. (1995). Gender and patterns of sexual risk taking in college students. Sex Roles, 32, 545–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, C. (1989). Sex difference s in psychosocial consequence s of alcohol and drug abuse. Journ al of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D., Moore, S., & Brumen, I. (1990). Ethnic group differences in adolescents' response s to AIDS. Australian Jo urnal of Social Issues, 25, 220–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schur, E. M. (1984). Lab eling women deviant. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severson, H.H., Slovic, P., & Hampson, S. (1993). Adolescents perception of risk:Understanding and preventing high risk behavior. Advan ces in Consumer Research, 20, 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, R., Siegel, A. W., Scovill, L. C., & Hays, J. (1998). Risk-taking patterns of female adolescents: what they do and why. Jo urnal of Ado lescence, 21, 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. S. (1989). Feminist theory, crime, and justice. Criminology, 27, 605–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1976). Women, crime and criminology.A feminist critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.A. (1979). Sex and deviance:An asse ssment ofmajor sociological variable s. Socio logical Quarterly, 20, 183–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. A., & Paternoster, R. (1987). The gender gap in theories of deviance: Issues and evidence. Jo urnal of Research in Crime an d Delinquen cy, 24, 140–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spigner, C., Hawkins, W., & Loren, W. (1993). Gende r differences in perception of risk associated with alcohol and drug use among college students. Women & Health, 20, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D. (1993). National trends in female arre sts, 1960–1990: Assessment and recommendations for re search. Jo urnal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 413–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensmeier, D., & Allan, E. (1996). Gende r and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annu al Review of Socio logy, 2, 459–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. A., & Nyamathi, A. (1999). Gende r differences in re lationships among stress, coping, and health risk behaviors in impove rished, minority populations. Person ality and Individual Differences, 26, 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1978).Criminology (10th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don ' t und erstand: Women an d men in con versation. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. G., & Herz, D. C. (1996). Gender differences in factors of social control and rational choice. Deviant Behavior, 17, 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (1994). Integrating biological and sociological mode ls of adolesce nt problem behaviors. In R. D. Ke tterlinus & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Adolescen t prob lem beh aviors (pp. 93–108). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, I. (1997). Changing gender roles and gender difference s in health behavior. In D. S. Gochman (Ed.), Hand boo k of health behavior research.I.Perso nal and social determinants (pp. 303–328). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, H. R. (Ed.) (1997). Women, men, & gender.Ongo ing debates. New Have n, CT: Yale University Pre ss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner-Wilson, R. J. (1998). Gende r differences in adolescent sexual attitudes: The influence of individual and family factors. Adolescen ce, 33, 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. R. (1992). Early problem behavior and later drug problems. Jou rnal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 412–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1993). Le thal confrontational violence among young men. In N. J. Bell and R.W. Bell (Eds.), Adolescent risk taking (pp. 84–106). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingwood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (1998). Gender-related corre lates and predictors of consistent condom use among young adult African-American women: a prospective analysis. Internatio nal Jou rnal of STD & AIDS, 9, 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sen sation seeking: Beyo nd the optimal level of arou sal. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (199l). Sensation seeking: The balance between risk and reward. In L. P. Lipsitt & L. L. Mitnick (Eds.), Self-regulato ry beh avior and risk taking: Causes and conseq uences (pp. 143–152). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  • Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation se eking in England and Ame rica: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Jou rnal of Consulting an d Clinical Psych ology, 46, 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Nancy J. Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keri K. O'Neal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Du Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carol J. Schoenrock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bell, N.J., O'Neal, K.K., Feng, D. et al. Gender and Sexual Risk. Sex Roles 41, 313–332 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018866515084

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018866515084

Keywords

Search

Navigation