Abstract
East Asian students have consistently outperformed their counterparts in Western countries in recent international studies of mathematics achievement. However, these countries do not seem to have an established theory of mathematics education, and their teaching has been criticized as traditional and old fashioned. In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education, this paper discusses the features of the East Asian mathematics education and their underlying values in contrast to features and values in the West. These are presented in terms of six dichotomies,namely, product versus process; rote learning versus meaningful learning;studying hard versus pleasurable learning;extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations;whole class teaching versus individualized learning; and competence of teachers:subject matter versus pedagogy. It is argued that these features are based on deep-rooted cultural values and paradigms. A characterization of these features and an analysis of the underlying values are essential in this search for an East Asian identity in mathematics education.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bae, C.K.: 1991, ‘Education: Top reason behind rapid growth. Schooling for economic takeoff’, Koreana 5(2), 56–68. [in Korean]
Beaton, A.E. et al.: 1996, Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School Years, Centre for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College, Boston.
Biggs, J.B.: 1994, ‘What are effective schools? Lessons from East and West’ (The Radford Memorial Lecture), Australian Educational Researcher 21, 19–39.
Biggs, J.B.: 1996, ‘Western misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture’, in D.A. Watkins and J.B. Biggs (eds.), The Chinese Learner, Comparative Education Research Centre, Hong Kong.
Brimer, A. and Griffin, P.: 1985, Mathematics Achievement in Hong Kong Secondary Schools, Centre of Asian Studies, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Cheng, K.M.: 1994, ‘Quality of education as perceived in the Chinese culture’, in T. Takala (ed.), Quality of Education in the Context of Culture in Developing Countries, Tampere University Press, Tampere.
Dahlin, B. and Watkins, D.: 2000, ‘The role of repetition in the process of memorisation and understanding: A comparison of views of German and Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 70, 65–84.
Ding, S.S. and Zhang Z.G.: 1989, Shu Xue Yu Jiao Yu (Mathematics and Education), Hunan Educational Press, Hunam. [in Chinese]
Fung, C.I.: 2000, Pedagogical Content Knowledge versus Subject Matter Knowledge, unpublished PhD thesis, the University of Hong Kong.
Garvey, A. and Jackson, B.: 1975, Chinese Children: Research and Action Project into the Needs of Chinese Children, National Education Research Development Trust, Cambridge.
Hess, R.D. and Azuma, M.: 1991, ‘Cultural support for schooling: Contrasts between Japan and the United States’, Education Researcher 20(9), 2–8.
Hess, R.D., Chang, C.M. and McDevitt, T.M.: 1987, ‘Cultural variations in family beliefs about children's performance in mathematics: Comparisons among People's Republic of China, Chinese-American, and Caucasian-American families’, Journal of Educational Psychology 79(2), 179–188.
Ho, D.Y.F.: 1991, Cognitive Socialization in Confucian Heritage Cultures, paper presented at the Workshop on Continuities and Discontinuities in the Cognitive Socialization of Minority Children, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington D.C., June 29-July 2.
Ho, D.Y.F. and Kang, T.K.: 1984, ‘Intergenerational comparisons of child-rearing attitudes and practices in Hong Kong’, Developmental Psychology 20, 1004–1016.
Huang, G.: 1969, Bi Jiao Jiao Yu Zhe Xue (Comparative Study of Philosophy of Education), Po Mi Er Press, Taipei, Taiwan. [in Chinese]
Lapointe, A.E. et al. (eds.): 1992, The International Assessment of Educational Progress Report No. 22-CAEP-01: Learning Mathematics,the Centre for the Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service, New Jersey.
Leestma, R. et al.: 1987, Japanese Education Today, A Report from the U.S. Study of Education in Japan, Office of Educational and Research Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
Legge, J. (trans.): 1885, The Sacred Books of China, part III, The Li Ki (The Book of Rites), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Legge, J. (trans.): 1930, The Four Books, The Commercial Press, Ltd., China.
Leung, F.K.S.: 1992, A Comparison of the Intended Mathematics Curriculum in China, Hong Kong and England and the Implementation in Beijing, Hong Kong and London, Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
Leung, F.K.S.: 1995, ‘The mathematics classroom in Beijing, Hong Kong and London’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 29, 297–325.
Leung, F.K.S.: 1999, ‘The traditional Chinese views of mathematics and education: Implications for mathematics education in the new millennium’, in C. Hoyles, C. Morgan and G. Woodhouse (eds.), Mathematics Education in the 21st Century, Falmer Press Ltd., London, 240–247.
Leung, F.K.S.: 2000, An Exploration into the Reasons for the High Achievement of East Asian Students, paper presented at the International Conference on Mathematics Education, History of Mathematics and Cultural History of Mathematics, Informatics and Learning Obstacles, Beijing, July.
Liu, I.M.: 1984, A Survey of Memorization Requirement in Taipei Primary and Secondary Schools, Unpublished manuscript, National Taiwan University.
Liu, I.M.: 1986, ‘Chinese cognition’, in M.N. Bond (ed.), The Psychology of the Chinese People, Oxford University Press, Hong Kong.
Lynn, R.: 1988, Educational Achievement in Japan, Macmillan Press, Basingstoke.
Ma, L.: 1999, Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, N.J.
Marton, F., Alba, G.D. and Tse, L.K.: 1996, ‘Memorizing and Understanding: the Keys to the Paradox?’, in D.A. Watkins and J.B. Biggs (eds.), The Chinese Learner, Comparative Education Research Centre, Hong Kong.
Marton, F.: 1997, Student Learning: East and West, public lecture delivered at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, 18 March.
Mullis, I.V.S. et al.: 1997, Mathematics Achievement in the Primary School Years, Centre for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College, Boston.
Robitaille, D.F. and Garden, R.A. (eds.): 1989, The IEA Study of Mathematics II: Contexts and Outcomes of School Mathematics, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Sollenberger, R.T.:1968, ‘Chinese-American child-rearing practices and juvenile delinquency’, Journal of Social Psychology 74, 13–23.
Stevenson, H.W. et al.: 1987, ‘Classroom behavior and achievement of Japanese, Chinese and American children’, in R. Glaser (ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology, vol.3, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Stevenson, H.W. et al.: 1990, Making the Grade in Mathematics: Chinese, Japanese and American Children, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
Stevenson, H.W. et al.: 1993, ‘Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children: Ten years later’, Science 25(9), 53–59.
Taylor, M.J.: 1987, Chinese Pupils in Britain, NFER-Nelson, Windsor.
Wong, N.Y.: 1998, ‘In search of the “CHC” learner: Smarter, works harder or something more?’, Plenary lecture, in H.S. Park, Y.H. Choe, H. Shin and S.H. Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematical Education, 1, 85–98.
Wong, K.M. and Cheung, W.W.: 1997, ‘A survey of the current state of primary mathematics teaching in Hong Kong’, EduMath 4, 3–15.
Yang, H.H., Kim, E.S. and Kim, H.S.: 1995, World History, Kyo-Hak-Sa, Seoul. [in Korean]
Yang, K.S.: 1981, ‘Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan’, Journal of Social Psychology 113, 159–70.
Yang, Xiong (53 B.C.- 18 A.D.): 1939, Fa Yan, Shang Wu Yin Shu Guan, Changsha.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leung, F.K. In Search of an East Asian Identity in Mathematics Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics 47, 35–51 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017936429620
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017936429620