Skip to main content
Log in

E-mentoring: Using Computer Mediated Communication to Enhance the Mentoring Process

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The information age is changing the dynamics of many relationships, including mentoring. This article defines traditional mentoring according to its function and effectiveness and then expands the definition of mentoring to include computer-mediated communication (CMC), or “e-mentoring.” We propose that e-mentoring holds promise for redefining mentoring relationships and changing the conditions under which mentoring is sought and offered. E-mentoring could potentially make mentoring relationships more available to groups that have previously had limited access to mentoring. Benefits of and barriers to e-mentoring are considered, as are strategies for establishing an e-mentoring relationship. E-mentoring resources are reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. (July, 1995). Electronic mentoring. Futurist, 29(4), 55.

  • Bennett, D. T. (1997, March/April). Providing role models online. Electronic Learning, 19(5), 50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckman, A. (1998). Community support for constructionist learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 47–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, E. G. C., & Scott, P. (1978). Everyone who makes it has a mentor. Harvard Business Review, 89–10l.

  • Cosgrove, T. J. (1986). The effects of participation in a mentoring-transcript program on freshmen. Journal of College Student Personnel, 27, 119–124. Educational Horizons (Spring, 1995). 73 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagenson, E. A. (1989). The mentor advantage: Perceived career/job experiences of protégés versus non-protégés. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 309–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folsom, A. C. (1995). The contributions of locus of control to the effect of mentoring tactics in computer-based instruction on college students' achievement. Doctoral Dissertation. DAI, 56-12A: 4734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, M. W. & Cohen, N. H. (eds.) (1995). Mentoring: New strategies and challenges. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, no.66, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. (1992, March 13) Creative solutions: Electronic mentoring. Science, 255(5050), 1369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M. (2/2/1997). Perspectives on telementoring and mentor center. National School Network Telementoring and Mentor Center. http://nsn.bbn.com/ telementor wrkshp/goldman.html

  • Hansman, C. A. (1998). Mentoring and women's career development. In Bierema, L. L. (Ed.), Women's career development across the lifespan: Insights and strategies for women, organizations and adult educators (pp.63–73). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, no. 80. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. with O'Bryan, E., & Rotenberg, L. (l996). Practical lessons in telementoring. Learning and Leading with Technology, 24(2), 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haworth, K. (1998, April 17). Mentor programs provide support via e-mail to women studying science. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, 44(32) A29–A30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, L. (1998). Race, gender and mentoring programs. Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development Conference, 785–790. Chicago, IL.

  • Huang, C., & Lynch, J. Mentoring. New York: Harper Collins, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubschman, B. G. (1996). The effect of mentoring electronic mail on student achievement and attitudes in a graduate course in educational research. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57-08A:3417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, M. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Education Research, 61, 505–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D., Darrow, C., Klein, E., Levinson, M., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a man's life. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, C. A., & others. (1995). Mentoring: An approach to technology education for teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(1), 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1983). Mentors and prot´eg´es: A critical review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 33, 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. R. (1991). Computer to computer: Mentoring possibilities. Educational Leadership, 49(3), 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrel, A. J., Crosby, F. J., & Ely, R. J.(Eds.). (1999). Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadis, S. (1996, August 1). Internet mentors seek to bring more women into science. Nature, 382, (6590), 381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A. (1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41, 457–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, D. K., Wagner, R., & Gomez, L. M. (1996). Online mentors: Experimenting in science class. Educational Leadership, 54,(3), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfleeger, S. L., & Mertz, N. (1995), Executive mentoring: What makes it work? Communications of the ACM, 38(1), 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, G. (1979). Much ado about mentors. Harvard Business Review, 19, 14–16, 20, 24, 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumard, S. L. (1995). A collaborative PDS project about computer networking in art education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56-09A:3421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Single, P. B., & Muller, C. B. (2001). When email and mentoring unite: The implementation of a nationwide electronic mentoring program. In L. Stromei (Ed.), Implementing successful coaching and mentoring programs (pp. 107–122). Cambridge, MA: American Society for Training & Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproul, L., & Kiesler, S. (1993). Connections: New ways of working in networked organizations. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stell, C. S. (1999). The power of e-mentoring. Legal Assistant Today (May/June 1999) 16(5), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey, M. G. (1984). The mentor connection. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bierema, L.L., Merriam, S.B. E-mentoring: Using Computer Mediated Communication to Enhance the Mentoring Process. Innovative Higher Education 26, 211–227 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017921023103

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017921023103

Navigation