Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous Prompting and Instructive Feedback When Teaching Chained Tasks

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the simultaneous prompting procedure when teaching students with moderate to severe mental retardation a chained task (i.e., hand washing). This study also evaluated if students could acquire responses to instructive feedback stimuli presented during training sessions. The effectiveness of these procedures was assessed by using a multiple probe across students design. Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization data were collected and analyzed. Results indicated that the simultaneous prompting procedure was effective in teaching 3 of the 5 students to follow a 16-step task analysis to wash their hands. All students who met criterion maintained and generalized the skills with 100% accuracy. All students acquired some of the instructive feedback stimuli. Future research issues are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R.,& Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: Arationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst, A. E., Schuster, J.W., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1996). Single Subject Research Advisor [Computer software]. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromer, K. L., Schuster, J. W., Collins, B. C., & Grisham-Brown, J. (1998). Teaching information on medical prescriptions using two different instructive feedback schedules. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetko, K., Schuster, J. W., Collins, B. C., & Harley, D. A. (1999). Teaching a chained vocational task to young adults with severe mental disabilities using simultaneous prompting. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 318–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fickel, K., Schuster, J.W., & Collins, B. C. (1998). The effectiveness of simultaneous prompting with a small heterogeneous group of middle school students when taught different tasks using different stimuli. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8, 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, A. N., & Schuster, J. W. (1992). The use of simultaneous prompting for teaching expressive word recognition to preschool children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 247–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffen, A. K., & Schuster, J. W., & Morse, T. E. (1998). The acquisition of instructive feedback: A comparison of continuous versus intermittent presentation schedules. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. G., Schuster, J. W., Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching chained tasks in a divided half format. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P., Schuster, J.W.,& Bell, J. (1996). Comparison of simultaneous prompting with and without error correction in teaching science vocabularywords to high school students with mild disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 437–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. Y., & Collins, B. C. (1997). Teaching microwave skills to adults with disabilities: Acquisition of nutrition and safety facts presented as nontargeted information. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9(1), 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keel, M. C., & Gast, D. L. (1992). Small-group instructional for students with learning disabilities: Observational and incidental learning. Exceptional Children, 58, 357–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciag, K. G., Schuster, J. W., Collins, B. C., & Cooper, J. T. (2000). Training adults with moderate and severe mental retardation in a vocational skill using a simultaneous prompting procedure. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 306–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland-Smith, J., Schuster, J. W., & Stevens, K. B. (1993). Using simultaneous prompting to teach expressive object identification to preschoolers with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. W., & Griffen, A. K. (1993). Teaching a chained task with a simultaneous prompting procedure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. W., Griffen, A. K., & Wolery, M. (1992). A comparison of simultaneous prompting and constant time delay procedures in teaching sight words to elementary students with moderate mental retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 305–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, T. J., Collins, B. C., Hemmeter, M. L.,& Schuster, J.W. (1998). Using simultaneous prompting within an activity-based format to teach dressing skills to preschoolers with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 132–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, D., Schuster, J.W., Morse, T., & Collins, B. (1999). A comparison of antecedent prompt and test and simultaneous prompting procedures in teaching grocery sight words to adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation andDevelopmental Disabilities, 34, 182–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, K., Schuster, J.W., & Ault, M. J. (1995). Simultaneous prompting in a small group instructional arrangement. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 218–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, D., Gast, D. L., Wolery, M., & Collins, B. C. (1991). Acquisition of nontargeted information during small group instruction. Exceptionality, 2, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonecipher, E. L., Schuster, J.W., Collins, B. C.,& Grisham-Brown, J. (1999). Teaching gift wrapping skills in a quadruple instructional arrangement using constant time delay. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 11, 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Gast, D. L. (1995). Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Bailey, D.,& Sugai, G. M. (1988) Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional children. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., Werts, M., & Cipolloni, R. (1993). Effects of simultaneous prompting and instructive feedback. Early Education and Development, 4, 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Werts, M. G., Holcombe, A., Billings, S. S., & Vassilaros, M. A. (1993). Instructive feedback:Acomparison of simultaneous and alternating presentation of nontarget stimuli. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parrott, K.A., Schuster, J.W., Collins, B.C. et al. Simultaneous Prompting and Instructive Feedback When Teaching Chained Tasks. Journal of Behavioral Education 10, 3–19 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016639721684

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016639721684

Navigation