Skip to main content
Log in

Parents' Explanations of Their Child's Performance in Mathematics and Reading: A Replication and Extension of Yee and Eccles

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine whether Finnish parents would endorse the “the classic gender-related attribution pattern” and explain their son's mathematical performance in terms of talent and their daughter's in terms of effort. In addition, we examined whether the pattern of attributions would be the opposite in regard to parental explanations of their child's reading performance. A group of parents (N = 486), both mothers and fathers, were requested to assess the level of competence of their 1st grader in mathematics and reading. The parents were also asked to recall events from their child's 1st school year in which the child succeeded and failed in mathematics and reading; they were then asked to evaluate the importance of talent, effort, and task to the child's outcomes. The parents of boys assessed their child's mathematical competence to be higher than did the parents of girls. Furthermore, the parents of boys rated talent as a more important reason for their child's mathematical success than did the parents of girls. In contrast, the parents of girls rated effort as a more important reason for their child's mathematical success. Although the girls were perceived to surpass boys in reading, the girls' positive outcomes in reading were explained by effort more than the boys' outcomes, and at the highest level of assessed competence, the boys' verbal talent was rated as a more significant cause of success in reading than the girls' verbal talent. In sum, our results suggested that in both mathematics and reading, girls were not entitled to ability-based attribution to the same extent as were boys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competence beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 719-747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, S. (1998/1999). Gender differences in causal attributions by college students of performance on course examinations. Current Psychology, 17 346-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, S. (1999). The accuracy of academic gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 40 787-813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornholt, L. (2000). The gendered nature of competence: Specific and general aspects of self knowledge in social contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30 252-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornholt, L., & Goodnow, J. (1999). Cross-generation perceptions of academic competence. Parental expectations and adolescent self disclosure. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14 427-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carugati, F. (1990). From social cognition to social representations in the study of intelligence. In G. Duveen & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 126-143). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Janis, E., & Harold, R. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46 183-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles-Parsons, J., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J., et al. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 53 310-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emiliani, F., & Molinari, L. (1988). What everybody knows about children: Mothers' ideas on early childhood. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1 19-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S., & Stevens, L. (1998). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In B. M. Clinchy & J. Norem (Eds.), The gender and psychology reader (pp. 505-522). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimond, S., & Roussel, L. (2001). Bragging about one's school grades: Gender stereotyping and students' perception of their abilities in science, mathematics, and languages. Social Psychology of Education, 3-4 275-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M., Wikeley, F., & Nash, T. (1994). Parents and their children's schools. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1991). The influence of gender stereotypes on parent and child mathematics attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 518-527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., & Eccles, J. (1992). The impact of mothers' gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers' and children's ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63 932-944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., Manhal, M., & Mee, L. (1991). Parental beliefs, parental accuracy, and children's cognitive performance. Developmental Psychology, 27 267-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82 213-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, C., & Dweck, C. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 33-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1992). Does gender make any difference? Commonsense conceptions of intelligence. Social Behavior and Personality, 20 310-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räty, H., & Snellman, L. (1997). Children's images of an intelligent person. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12 773-784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räty, H., Snellman, L., & Vainikainen, A. (1999). Parents' assessments of their children's abilities. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14 423-437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S., & Simpson, C. (1984). The formation of ability conceptions: Developmental trend or social construction? Review of Educational Research, 54 31-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S., Licht, B., Wagner, R., & Stader, S. (1996). Organization of children's academic-related self-perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8 387-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J., & Sanna, L. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 507-519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann, J. (2000). Parents' gender stereotypes and teachers' beliefs as predictors of children's concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 144-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, R., & Walkerdine, V. (1985). Girls and mathematics. From primary to secondary schooling (Bedford Way Papers 24). London: University of London, Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & Best, D. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, D., & Eccles, J. (1988). Parent perceptions and attributions for children's math achievement. Sex Roles, 19 317-333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Räty, H., Vänskä, J., Kasanen, K. et al. Parents' Explanations of Their Child's Performance in Mathematics and Reading: A Replication and Extension of Yee and Eccles. Sex Roles 46, 121–128 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016573627828

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016573627828

Navigation