Skip to main content
Log in

The efficacy of `whole word' versus `analytic' reading instruction for children with Down syndrome

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An intervention study was conducted toinvestigate whether children with Down syndrome(DS) would benefit from an `analytic' approachto reading instruction, which encompassedexplicit training in phonological awareness.Participants were seven English-speakingchildren with DS aged 8;6 (years;months) to11;1, who demonstrated little or nononword-reading ability prior to intervention.The children received weekly instruction (forsix weeks) in reading aloud 30 regularly speltmonosyllables (e.g., ten, bake) using an`analytic' approach, in which words werelearned by combining onsets with rimes (fourchildren), or a `whole-word' approach (threechildren). Participants' oral reading wasassessed pre- and post-intervention using areading test comprising the 30 trained wordsand 30 untrained (generalisation) words. Mostchildren (six out of seven) read more trainingwords correctly after intervention than before,with significant improvement shown by fourchildren (two trained analytically, and twotrained with whole words). More importantly,reading of generalisation words improvedsignificantly in only three children, all ofwhom had received analytic training. It wasconcluded that children with DS benefit from ananalytic approach to reading instruction, eventhough their auditory-verbal memory (assessedusing digit span) is poor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barudin, S.I. & Hourcade, J.J. (1990). Relative effectiveness of three methods of reading instruction in developing specific recall and transfer skills in learners with moderate and severe mental retardation, Education and Training in Mental Retardation 25: 286-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson, P. (1993). Reading acquisition and phonemic awareness testing: How conclusive are data from Down's syndrome? (Remarks on Cossu, Rossini, and Marshall 1993), Cognition 48: 281-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, S. (1985). Attaining basic educational skills: reading, writing and number. In: D. Lane & B. Stratford (eds.), Current approaches to Down's syndrome (pp. 315-343). London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, S., Bird, G. & Byrne, A. (1996). Reading acquisition by young children. In: B. Stratford & P. Gunn (eds.), New approaches to Down syndrome (pp. 268-279). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. (1993). Learning to read in the absence of phonemic awareness? A comment on Cossu, Rossini, and Marshall (1993), Cognition 48: 285-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossu, G., Rossini, F. & Marshall, J.C. (1993a). When reading is acquired but phonemic awareness is not: A study of literacy in Down's syndrome, Cognition 46: 129-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossu, G., Rossini, F. & Marshall, J.C. (1993b). Reading is reading is reading, Cognition 48: 297-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupples, L. & Iacono, T. (2000). Phonological awareness and oral reading skill in children with Down syndrome, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 43: 595-608.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, E.A.B. (1993). Learning to read at an early age. Case study of a Dutch boy, Down's Syndrome: Research and Practice 1: 87-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L.M. & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. & Elkins, J. (1995). Literacy for all? The case of Down syndrome, Journal of Reading 38: 270-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. & Bryant, P.E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, K.T. & Tunmer, W.E. (1996). Onset/rime sensitivity and orthographic analogies in normal and poor readers, Applied Psycholinguistics 17: 15-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, K.T., Tunmer, W.E. & Chapman, J.W. (1997). Effects of rime-based orthographic analogy training on the word recognition skills of children with reading disability, Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 645-651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodapp, R.M. & Fidler, D.J. (1999). Special education and genetics: Connections for the 21st century, Journal of Special Education 33: 130-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogeveen, F.R., Kouwenhoven, J.A. & Smeets, P.M. (1989). Establishing sound blending in moderately mentally retarded children: Implications of verbal instruction and pictorial prompting, Research in Developmental Disabilities 10: 333-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogeveen, F.R. & Smeets, P.M. (1988). Establishing phoneme blending in trainable mentally retarded children, Remedial and Special Education 9: 46-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogeveen, F.R., Smeets, P.M. & van der Houven, J.E. (1987). Establishing letter-sound correspondences in children classified as trainable mentally retarded, Education and Training in Mental Retardation 22: 77-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, A.F. & Share, D.L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition, Applied Psycholinguistics 4: 103-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay-Raining Bird, E. & Chapman, R.S. (1994). Sequential recall in individuals with Down syndrome, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37: 1369-1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, K.T. & Sabsay, S. (1996). Linguistic and cognitive ability of adults with Down syndrome and mental retardation of unknown etiology, Journal of Communication Disorders 29: 401-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S. & Hulme, C. (1987). Memory span development in Down's syndrome, severely subnormal and normal subjects, Cognitive Neuropsychology 4: 303-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcell, M. & Armstrong, V. (1982). Auditory and sequential memory of Down syndrome and nonretarded children, American Journal of Mental Retardation 87: 86-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcell, M. & Weeks, S. (1988). Short-term memory difficulties and Down's syndrome, Journal of Mental Deficiency Research 32: 153-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDade, H. & Adler, S. (1980). Down syndrome and short-term memory impairment: A storage or retrieval deficit?, American Journal of Mental Deficiency 84: 561-567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1987). Language and communication characteristics in children with Down syndrome. In: M. Pueschel, C. Tingey, J. Rynders, A. Crocker & D. Crutcher (eds.), New perspectives on Down syndrome (pp. 233-262). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K. & Hulme, C. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills, Reading Research Quarterly 32: 154-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, R.E., Jenkins, J.R., Leicester, N. & Slocum, T.A. (1993). Teaching phonological awareness to young children with learning disabilities, Exceptional Children 59: 532-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J.C., Court, J.H. & Raven, J. (1995). Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P.T., Roizen, N.J. & Capone, G.T. (1996). Down syndrome. In: A.J. Capute & P.J. Accardo (eds.), Developmental disabilities in infancy and childhood, 2nd edn. Baltimore: P.H. Brookes Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., Küspert, P., Roth, E., Visé, M., & Marx, H. (1997). Short-and long-term effects of training phonological awareness in kindergarten: Evidence from two German studies, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 66: 311-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P.H.K., Duncan, L.G. & Bolik, F.M. (1999). Rhymes and phonemes in the common unit task: Replications and implications for beginning reading, Journal of Research in Reading 22: 113-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition, Cognition 55: 151-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. & Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. & Singh, N.N. (1985). Comparison of word-supply and word-analysis error-correction procedures on oral reading by mentally retarded children, American Journal of Mental Deficiency 90: 64-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N.N. & Singh, J. (1988). Increasing oral reading proficiency through overcorrection and phonic analysis, American Journal on Mental Retardation 93: 312-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, M. & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages?, Cognition 30: 139-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnhagen, C., Das, J. & Varnhagen, S. (1987). Auditory and visual memory span: Cognitive processing by TMR individuals with Down syndrome or other etiologies, American Journal of Mental Deficiency 91: 398-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.K. & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills, Psychological Bulletin 101: 192-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R. & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important, Cognition 40: 219-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, J.G. (1993). The development of learning difficulties in children with Down's syndrome, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 37: 389-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Cupples.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cupples, L., Iacono, T. The efficacy of `whole word' versus `analytic' reading instruction for children with Down syndrome. Reading and Writing 15, 549–574 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016385114848

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016385114848

Navigation