Abstract
Akiake's Information Criterion (AIC) is commonly used in univariate twin modeling of a discrete trait to prune a full model into a more parsimonious submodel. It is possible that this practice could introduce bias and inaccuracy, and we could identify no prior systematic study of these issues. Thus, we used simulation to investigate the performance of AIC-guided modeling across a broad range of parameters. Our simulations indicated that the use of the AIC to determine the “best” univariate model for a discrete trait tended to yield the incorrect model rather frequently. Moreover the parameter estimates of the “best” model by AIC were biased sharply upward as were the associated 95% confidence intervals. These results suggest that the use of AIC to guide twin modeling for univariate discrete traits should either be abandoned or used with great caution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Akiake, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52:317–332.
Eaves, L. J. (1970). Aspects of Human Psychogenetics. Unpublished PhD, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall.
Falconer, D. S. (1965). The inheritance of liability to certain diseases, estimated from the incidence among relatives. Ann. Hum. Genet. (London) 29:51–76.
Jinks, J. L., and Fulker, D. W. (1970). Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior. Psychol. Bull. 73(5), 311–349.
Jöreskog, K. G., and Söbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kendler, K. S., MacLean, C., Neale, M., Kessler, R., Heath, A., and Eaves, L. (1991). The genetic epidemiology of bulimia nervosa. Am. J. Psychiatry 148:1627–1637.
Kraemer, H. C. (1997). What is the ‘right’ statistical measure of twin concordance (or diagnostic reliability and validity)? Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 54(12), 1121–1124.
Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Kearsey, M. H., and Davies, P. (1978). The power of the classical twin study. Heredity 40:97–116.
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., and Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol. Bull. 105:430–445.
Neale, M. C., Boker, S., Xie, G., and Maes, H. (1999). Mx: Statistical Modeling (5th ed.). Richmond, VA: Medical College of Virginia, Department of Psychiatry.
Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for the Study of Twins and Families. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher Group.
Neale, M. C., Eaves, L. J., and Kendler, K. S. (1994). The power of the classical twin study to resolve variation in threshold traits. Behav. Genet. 24:239–258.
Neale, M. C., and Miller, M. B. (1997). The use of likelihood-based confidence intervals in genetic models. Behav. Genet. 27:113–120.
SAS Institute Inc. (1999). SAS/STAT® Software: Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
Williams, L. J., and Holahan, P. J. (1994). Parsimony-based fit indices for multiple-indicator models: do they work? Structural Equation Model. 1:161–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sullivan, P.F., Eaves, L.J. Evaluation of Analyses of Univariate Discrete Twin Data. Behav Genet 32, 221–227 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016025229858
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016025229858