Skip to main content
Log in

Are There Gender Differences in Sustaining Dating Violence? An Examination of Frequency, Severity, and Relationship Satisfaction

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One topic of debate within the field of intimate violence involves the equivalence, or lack thereof, of male-perpetrated versus female-perpetrated violence. To inform this debate, we examined potential gender-related differences in the frequency of sustaining violence, the severity of violence sustained, and effects of violence on relationship satisfaction. Data were collected from 2 samples of heterosexual undergraduates in dating relationships. In both studies, men and women experienced violence at comparable frequencies, although men experienced more frequent moderate violence. Rates of severe violence were extremely low for both sexes across studies. In both investigations, only women experienced lower relationship satisfaction as a function of partner violence. In Study 1, relationship status moderated this effect, such that women in serious dating relationships were less satisfied than either women in less serious relationships or than men as a function of partner violence. In Study 2, women were less satisfied with violent relationships than men regardless of relationship status. We contend that gender-sensitive approaches to relationship violence are important to better understand and prevent both male- and female-perpetrated violence. Directions for future research efforts are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Avni, N. (1991). Battered wives: Characteristics of their courtship days. J. Interpers. Viol. 6:232–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., and Beach, S. R. H. (1987). Validity of self reports of marital violence.J. Fam. Viol. 2:139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., and Pape, K. T. (1999). Psychological abuse: Implications for adjustment and commitment to leave violent partners. Viol. Vict. 14: 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, M. L., and Bernard, J. L. (1983). Violent intimacy: The family as a model for love relationships. Fam. Relat. 32:283–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethke, T. M., and DeJoy, D. M. (1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence. J. Interpers. Viol. 8: 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, D. M., and Crosby, L. (1997). Observed and reported psychological and physical aggression in young, at-risk couples. Soc. Dev. 6: 184–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1978). Partialed products are interactions; partialed powers are curve components. Psychol. Bull. 85: 858–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., and Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A re-evaluation.J. Marr. Fam. 49: 797–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Rutledge, L. L., Berg, B. J., Hause, E. S., and Polek, D. S. (1990). The role or emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. J. Fam. Viol. 5: 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foshee, V. A. (1996). Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse: Prevalence, types, and injuries. Health Educ. Res. 11: 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H. M., and Foshee, V. (1997). Adolescent dating violence: Differences between one-sided and mutually violent profiles. J. Interpers. Viol. 12: 126–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M.B. (1991). Effects of gender of aggressor, sex of target, and relationship on evaluations of physical aggression. J. Interpers. Viol. 6: 174–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henton, J., Cate, R., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., and Christopher, S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. J. Fam. Issues 4: 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, R. E., Sayers, S. L., and Bellack, A. S. (1994). Global marital satisfaction versus marital adjustment: An empirical comparison of three measures. J. Fam. Psychol. 8: 432–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D.C. (1992). Statistical MethodsFor Psychology, 3rd edn.,PWS-KentCompany, Boston,MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jezl, D. R., Molidor, C. E., and Wright, T. L. (1996). Physical, sexual, and psychological abuse in high school dating relationships: Prevalence rates and self-esteem issues. Child Adolesc.Soc. Work J. 13: 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasian, M., and Painter, S. L. (1992). Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population. J. Interpers. Viol. 7: 350–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., Anderson, P., and Beach, S. R. H. (1997). Dating relationship quality: Effects of global self-verification and self-enhancement. J. Pers. Soc. Relat. 14: 829–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., and Beach, S. R. H. (1997a). Romance in the crossfire: When do women's depressive symptoms influence partner relationship satisfaction? J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 16: 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., and Beach, S. R. H. (1997b). Self-verification and depressive symptoms in marriage and courtship: A multiple pathway model. J. Marr. Fam. 15: 903–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., Beach, S. R. H., and Joiner, T. E., Jr. (1998).When does partner devaluation predict emotional distress? Prospective moderating effects of reassurance-seeking and self-esteem.Pers. Relation. 5: 409–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., Beach, S. R. H., and Joiner, T. E., Jr. (1999). Contagious depression in dating couples.J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 18: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurz, D. (1995). Physical assaults by male partners: A major social problem. In Walsh, M. R.(ed.), Women, Men, and Gender, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 222–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. J., and Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marr. Fam. Living 21: 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Fam. Relat. 30: 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Fam. Relat.35: 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. (1989). Dating, living together, and courtship violence. In Pirog-Good, M. A.,and Stets, J. E. (eds.), Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger Publishers, New York, pp. 94–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. L. (1996). Psychological abuse of women: Six distinct clusters J. Fam. Viol. 11:379–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. C., Frieze, I. H., and Browne, A. (1993). Research on battered woman and their assailants. In Denmark, F. L., and Paludi, M. A. (eds.), Psychology of Women: A Handbookof Issues and Theories, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, pp. 513–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadien,6M. B., and Denmark, F. L. (1999). Females and Autonomy: A Lifespan Perspective,Allyn & Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidig, P. H., and Friedman, D. H. (1984). Spouse Abuse: A Treatment Program for Couples, Research Press, Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital satisfaction: A critical look at the dependent variable.J. Marr. Fam. 45: 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'sullivan, L. F., and Byers, E. S. (1992). College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. J. Sex Res. 29: 435–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. S., O'Leary, K.D., and Breslin, F. C. (1990). Multiple correlates of physical aggression in dating couples. J. Interpers. Viol. 5: 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., and Frieze, I. H. (1989). Young singles’ scripts for a first date. Gender Soc. 3: 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J. Marr. Fam. 38: 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. (1991). Cohabiting and marital aggression: The role of social isolation. J. Marr. Fam.53: 669–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1987). Violence in dating relationships. Soc. Psychol. Q. 50:237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J., and Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989). Patterns of physical and sexual abuse for men and women in dating relationships: A descriptive analysis. J. Fam. Viol. 4: 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) scales. J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1995). Physical assaults by male partners: A major social problem. In Walsh, M. R. (ed.), Women, Men, and Gender, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT,pp. 210–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., and Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. J. Fam. Issues 17:283–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivian, D., and Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1994). Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison. Viol. Vict. 9: 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Katz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, J., Kuffel, S.W. & Coblentz, A. Are There Gender Differences in Sustaining Dating Violence? An Examination of Frequency, Severity, and Relationship Satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence 17, 247–271 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016005312091

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016005312091

Navigation