Skip to main content
Log in

Using Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations to Assess Cognitive Activity in Aggressive and Nonaggressive Adolescents

  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations (ATSS) is a “think aloud” method for examining a person's thought content as it unfolds in the situation. We used the ATSS to investigate the cognitive activity of aggressive and nonaggressive male and female adolescents as they listened to an audiotaped depiction of an ambiguous but provocative interaction with another student. Eighty-one adolescents participated in a 2 × 2 factorial experiment. The two factors were gender and aggressive vs. nonaggressive background. Students in the aggressive group had a history of aggressive behavior in the past year that was severe enough to warrant their arrest or suspension from school. Students in the nonaggressive group had no such history. As a secondary measure of anger and aggressiveness, we administered the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2). As predicted, males, compared to females, expressed more aggressive intent on the ATSS. Likewise, aggressive, compared to nonaggressive, adolescents expressed more anger and aggressive intent on the ATSS, as well as more intense feelings of anger, less control over their anger, and a greater tendency to externalize angry feelings on the STAXI-2. As expected, scores on the ATSS were related to scores on the STAXI-2. We concluded that the ATSS is a useful method for assessing cognitive activity that may mediate aggressive behavior in adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barbour, K. A., Eckhardt, C. I., Davison, G. C., & Kassinove, H. (1998). The experience and expression of anger in maritally violent and maritally discordant-nonviolent men. Behavior Therapy, 29, 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisholm, P. (1998). Girls are becoming more violent. In H. H. Kim (Ed.). Youth violence (2nd ed.; pp. 33–39). San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. G., Peterson, C. S., & Richards, H. (1999). Anger as a predictor of aggression among incarcerated adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 108–115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, G. C., Robins, C., & Johnson, M. K. (1983). Articulated thoughts during simulated situations: A paradigm for studying cognition in emotion and behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 7, 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, G. C., Vogel, R. S., & Coffman, S. G. (1997). Think-aloud approaches to cognitive assessment and the articulated thoughts in simulated situations paradigm. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 950–958.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., & Frame, C. L. (1982). Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys. Child Development, 53, 620–635.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Price, J. M., Bachorowski, J., & Newman, J. P. (1990). Hostile attributional biases in severely aggressive adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 385–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., & Somberg, D. R. (1987). Hostile attributional biases among aggressive boys are exacerbated under conditions of threats to the self. Child Development, 58, 213–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epps, J., & Kendall, P. C. (1995). Hostile attributional bias in adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, E., & Dodge, K. (1987). Social information processing and sociometric status: Sex, age, and situational effects. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 211–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, M.W. (1996). Cognitive problem solving and aggressive behavior among children. Families in Society, 77, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, N. G., & Slaby, R. G. (1989). Evaluative factors in social problem solving by aggressive boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Behavior, 17, 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A reseracher's handbook (2nd ed.). NewJersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). Social-cognitive processes of severely violent, moderately aggressive, and nonaggressive boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 366–374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggle, N. L., Garber J., Panak W. F., & Dodge K. A. (1992). Social information processing in aggressive and depressed children. Child Development, 63, 1305–1320.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1988). Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1999). Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanOostrum, N., & Horvath, P. (1997). The effects of hostile attribution on adolescents' aggressive responses to social situations. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13, 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger C. Katz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DiLiberto, L., Katz, R.C., Beauchamp, K.L. et al. Using Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations to Assess Cognitive Activity in Aggressive and Nonaggressive Adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies 11, 179–189 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015125625312

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015125625312

Navigation