Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Masculinity, Femininity, and Criminal Thinking in Male and Female Offenders

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 4 factor scales of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) were correlated with the Femininity and Masculinity scales of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) in 100 adult male (33% Caucasian, 44% African American, 21% Hispanic, 1% other) and 100 adult female (50% Caucasian, 30% African American, 8% Hispanic, 12% other) federal prison inmates. It was hypothesized that the BSRI Masculinity scale would correlate negatively with the PICTS problem avoidance scale and positively with the PICTS self-deception/assertion scale, and that the BSRI Femininity scale would correlate negatively with the PICTS interpersonal hostility scale and positively with PICTS denial of harm scale. In male inmates, as predicted, the BSRI masculinity scale correlated negatively with the PICTS problem avoidance scale and positively with the self-deception/assertion scale, although the latter coefficient fell short of statistical significance. In the case of female inmates the BSRI femininity scale correlated positively with denial of harm but failed to correlate significantly with interpersonal hostility. The implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Ballard-Reisch, D., & Elton, M. (1992). Gender orientation and the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A psychological construct revisited. Sex Roles, 27, 291-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. S., MacKenzie, D. L., & Robinson, J. W. (1987). Female offenders: Criminal behavior and gender-role identity. Psychological Reports, 60, 867-873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., Golden, K. M., & Cullen, J. B. (1979). Sex and delinquency: A partial test of the masculinity hypothesis. Criminology, 17, 301-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A. V., & White, H. R. (1987). Gender role orientations and styles of pathology among adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 158-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, R. F., & Cooper, M. L. (1994). Gender roles as mediators of sex differences in expressions of pathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 595-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasley, J., Kuhl, A. F., & Roberg, R. R. (1985). Relationship of nontraditional sex-role attitudes to severity of women's criminal behavior. Psychological Reports, 56, 155-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary, D. R., Newcomb, M. D., & Sadava, S. W. (1999). The male role, alcohol use, and alcohol problems: A structural modeling examination in adult women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 109-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shover, N., Norland, S., James, J., & Thornton, W. (1979). Gender roles and delinquency. Social Forces, 58, 162-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skitka, L. J., & Maslach, C. (1996). Gender as schematic category: A role construct approach. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 53-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental research in personality (Vol. 13, pp. 1-97). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (1996). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part III. Predictive validity. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 40, 105-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G.D. (1997). Predicting short-term release outcome using the LCSF and PICTS. Journal of Mental Health in Corrections Consortium, 43, 18-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D., & Elliott, W.N. (1999). Predicting release and disciplinary outcome with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Female data. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 15-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D., Elliott, W. N., & Miscoll, D. (1998). Use of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles in a group of female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 125-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widom, C. S. (1979). Female offenders: Three assumptions about self-esteem, sex-role identity, and feminism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 6, 365-382.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walters, G.D. The Relationship Between Masculinity, Femininity, and Criminal Thinking in Male and Female Offenders. Sex Roles 45, 677–689 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014819926761

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014819926761

Navigation