Skip to main content
Log in

The Protective Influence of Parents and Peers in Violence Avoidance Among African-American Youth

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: This study attempted to provide further insight into the roles of parents and peers as they influence youth involvement with violence. Specifically, this paper considers whether parents who are close to their children have children who affiliate with prosocial friends who may in turn serve as a buffer against violence. This study also considers how parent and peer influences may change as youth transition to adolescence. Methods: A cross-sectional health behavior survey was administered to 384 low-income, African-American youth aged 10–15 from three Chicago area schools. Structural equation models (SEM) were developed to assess the impact of youth reported prosocial friends and parental closeness on violence involvement. The overall model was tested to examine equivalence across preadolescent and adolescent age-groupings. Results: Results from the overall model indicated that parental closeness did not have a direct influence on youth violence involvement, but having a close parent–child relationship improved the youth's ability to select prosocial friends, which was directly related to decreased involvement with violence. Differences in the model by age-grouping suggested the presence of prosocial friends was a stronger factor for adolescent violence avoidance when compared to preadolescents. Conclusions: Parents can make a difference in the way in which their children choose their friends and therefore get involved with violence by maintaining a closely bonded relationship throughout preadolescence and adolescence. The importance of this closely bonded relationship has even greater effects for decreasing violence involvement for adolescents than preadolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Criminal victimization in the United States, 1992 (NCJ-145125). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garbarino J, Kostelny K, Dubrow N. No place to be a child. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, Bauman KE, Harris KM, Jones J, Tabor J, Beuhring T, Sieving RE, Shew M, Ireland M, Bearinger LH, Udry JR. Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. J Am Med Assoc 1997;278(10):823–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1987;57:316–31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bandura A. Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychol Rev 1977;84:191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eron LD, Huesmann LR. The stability of aggressive behavior-even into the third generation. In: Lewis M, Miller SM, editors. Handbook of developmental psychopathology. New York: Plenum Press, 1990:147–56.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sheline JL, Skipper BJ, Broadhead WE. Risk factors for violent behavior in elementary school boys: Have you hugged your child today? Am J Public Health 1994;84(4):661–3.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bailey SL, Flewelling RL, Rosenbaum DP. Characteristics of students who bring weapons to school. J Adolesc Health 1997;20(4):261–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bowen GL, Chapman MV. Poverty, neighborhood danger, social support and the individual adaptation among at-risk youth in urban areas. J Fam Issues 1996;17(5):641–66.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Powell KB. Correlates of violent and nonviolent behavior among vulnerable inner-city youths. Fam Community Health 1997;20(2):38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Felix-Ortiz M, Newcomb MD. Risk and protective factors for drug use among Latino and White adolescents. Hispanic J Behav Sci 1992;14:291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Patterson GR, Dishion TJ. Contributions of a families and peers to delinquency. Criminology 1985;23:63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Youniss J, Smollar J. Adolescents' interpersonal relationships in social context. In: Berndt TJ, Ladd GW, editors. Peer relationships in child development. New York: Wiley, 1989:300–16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berndt TJ, Zook JM. Effects of friendship on adolescent development. Bull Hong Kong Psychol Soc 1993;30-31:15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dishion TJ, Patterson GR, Stoolmiller M, Skinner ML. Family, school and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Dev Psychol 1991;27(1):172–80.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aseltine RH. A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance. J Health Soc Behav 1995;36:103–21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ma HK, Shek DTL, Cheung PC, Lee RYP. The relation of prosocial and antisocial behavior to personality and peer relationships of Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. J Genet Psychol 1996;157(3):255–66.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kandel DB. The parental and peer contexts of adolescent deviance: An algebra of interpersonal influences. J Drug Issues 1996;26(2):289–315.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chicago Public Schools. 1994 School Report Card. Chicago, IL: Author, 1994.

  21. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Current estimates from the national health interview survey, 1992 (DHHS Publication No. PHS 94-1517). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Catalano RF, Morrison DM, Wells EA, Gillmore MR, Iritani B, Hawkins JD. Ethnic differences in family factors related to early drug initiation. J Alcohol Stud 1992;53(3):208–17.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Little RJA. Regression with missing x's: A review. J Am Statistical Assoc 1992;87:1227–37.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bentler PM. EQS Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990;107:238–46.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 1980;88:588–606.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cotten NU, Resnick J, Browne DC, Martin SL, McCarraher DR, Woods J. Aggression and fighting behavior among African-American adolescents: Individual and family factors. Am J Pub Health 1994;84(4):618–22.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vanderschmidt HF, Lang JM, Knight-Williams V, Vanderschmidt GF. Risks among inner-city young teens: The prevalence of sexual activity, violence, drugs, and smoking. J Adol Health 1993;14:282–8.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bell CC, Jenkins EJ. Community violence and children on Chicago's southside. Psychiatry 1993;56:45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Resnicow K, Ross-Gaddy D, Vaughan RD. Structure of problem and positive behaviors in African American youths. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63(4):594–603.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, P., Flay, B.R., Bell, C.C. et al. The Protective Influence of Parents and Peers in Violence Avoidance Among African-American Youth. Matern Child Health J 5, 245–252 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013080822309

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013080822309

Navigation