Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the conception and measurement of popularity: more facts and some straight conclusions

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For many years, children receiving many liking nominations have been considered ‘popular’ in the sociometric literature. Recently, doubts have arisen that perhaps students' and teachers' notion of popularity involves social status and dominance rather than personal liking. It is argued in this paper that sociometric nominations of personal liking represent attractiveness for intimate friendship, whereas popularity should be measured directly via judgmental sociometry, in which children nominate directly the popular students and are not requested to express their personal feelings. Nominations of attractiveness, collected in conventional affective sociometry, were compared in six samples (153 classrooms) to direct judgments of popularity. Attractiveness and popularity were found to be distinct psychological constructs: (a) the average correlation between these nominations was only r = 0.44, and in most classrooms (72%) the same child did not receive the highest number of nominations for attractiveness and popularity; (b) a substantial proportion of students were highly popular but only moderately attractive or vice versa (21.5%), whereas only 9% were high in both attributes; (c) in terms of classroom climate and perceptions of classroom processes, popular students were less satisfied than attractive students, and were more critical of the learning climate and of their teachers' differential teaching behavior toward low- and high-achievers; and (d) differences between popular and attractive students were found in several attributes and aspects of self-esteem. These findings lead to the conclusion that the use of ‘popular’ in the Coie, Dodge, and Coppotelli (1982) two-dimensional model and the ensuing sociometric literature have been erroneous and lacking in ecological validity. Popularity should be measured directly via judgmental sociometry rather than be inferred from affective liking nominations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asher, Steven & Coie, John (Eds.) (1990). Peer rejection in childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Steven & Dodge, Kenneth (1986). Identifying children who are rejected by their peers. Developmental Psychology, 22, 444-449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, Steven & Hymel, Shelley (1981). Children's social competence in peer relations: Sociometric and behavioral assessment. In Wine J. & Smye M. (Eds.), Social competence. NY: Guilford, pp. 125-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, Elisha (1974). A multi-method approach to the assessment of humor: A critical look at humor tests. Journal of Personality, 42, 618-631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, Elisha (1990a). Measuring and changing teachers' differential behavior as perceived by students and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 683-690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, Elisha (1990b). Calling on students: How a teacher's behavior can acquire different meanings in students' minds. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 25, 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, Elisha (1993). Teachers' differential behavior. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 347-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, Elisha (1995). The ‘teacher's pet’ phenomenon, students' perceptions of teachers' differential behavior, and students' morale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 361-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, Elisha (1998). Preferential affect: The crux of the teacher expectancy issue. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Expectations in the classroom. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 183-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babad, Elisha & Ezer, Harel (1993). Seating locations of sociometrically measured student types: Methodological and substantive issues. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 75-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell-Dolan, Debora, Foster, Sharon, & Christopher, Jeanette (1992). Children's reactions to participating in a peer-relations study: An example of cost-effective assessment. Child Study Journal, 22, 137-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell-Dolan, Debora, Foster, Sharon, & Sikora, Darryn (1989). Effects of sociometric testing on children's behavior and loneliness in school. Developmental Psychology, 25, 306-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, Thomas & Ladd, Gary (Eds.) (1989). Peer relationships in child development. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerstedt, Ake (1956). Interpretations of sociometric choice status. Lund: Hakan Ohlssons Boktryckeri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatta, Edgar (1960). Analysis of social interaction and sociometric perception. In Jacob Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 272-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, Uri (1945). The measurement of sociometric status, structure and development. Sociometry Monographs, 6, 1-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, William & Cillessen, Antonius (Eds.) (1998). Sociometry then and now: Building on six decades of measuring children's experiences with the peer group. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, William & Hoza, Betsy (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In T. Berndt & G. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development. NY: Wiley, pp. 15-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, Janice (1986). Longitudinal analysis of adolescent girls' aspirations at school and perceptions of popularity. Adolescence, 11, 133-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, Robert (1983). Sociometry, psychometry, and social structure: A commentary on six recent studies of popular, rejected, and neglected children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 429-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, Robert & Cairns, Beverly (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, Robert, Xie, Hongling, & Leung, Man-Chi (1998). The popularity of friendship and the neglect of social networks: Toward a new balance. In W. Bukowski & A. Cillessen (Eds.), Sociometry then and now: Building on six decades of measuring children's experiences with the peer group. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 25-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, Rudolfo (1984). The use of high-inference measures to study classroom climates: A review. Review of Educational Research, 54, 237-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, John & Dodge, Kenneth (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, John, Dodge, Kenneth, & Coppotelli, Heide (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Harris & Good, Tom (1983). Pygmalion grows up. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coopersmith, Stanley (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criswell, Joan (1960). Foundations of sociometric measurement. In J. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 205-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, Daniel, Lemerise, Elizabeth, Caverly, Sarah, Ramsay, Shula, & Roberts, Julia (1998). Peer relations and school adjustment in ungraded primary children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 506-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnington, Margaret (1957). Behavioral differences in sociometric status groups in a nursery school. Child Development, 28, 103-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, Donna (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, Donna & Kinney, David (1995). The effect of middle school extracurricular activities on adolescents' popularity and peer status. Youth and Society, 26, 298-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Kathleen (1962). Sociometry and education. London: Routledge & Kegan-Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, William (1964). Tennessee self-concept scale: Test booklet. Nashville TN: Counsler Recordings and Tests.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Sharon & Ritchey, Wendy (1979). Issues in the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 12, 625-638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Barry (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Barry (1989). Twenty years of classroom environment research: Progress and prospect. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 307-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Barry & Walberg, Herbert (Eds.) (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, Wyndol & Robbins, Philip (1985). What's the point? Issues in the selection of treatment objectives. In B. Schneider, K. Rubin & J. Ledingham (Eds.), Children's peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 41-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, Norman (1959). Sociometry in the classroom.NewYork: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, Susan (1985). The self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayvren, Maureen & Hymel, Shelley (1984). Ethical issues in sociometric testing: Impact of sociometric measures on interaction behavior. Developmental Psychology, 20, 844-849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, Annette, Barton, Elizabeth, & Iverson, Grant (1997). Analysis of risk to children in a sociometric task. Developmental Psychology, 33, 104-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFontana, Kathryn & Cillessen, Antonius (1998). The nature of children's stereotypes of popularity. Social Development, 7, 301-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey, Gardner & Borgatta, Edgar (1954). Sociometric measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 405-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, Charles & Pepinsky, Harold (1949). Sociometry, 1937–1947: Theory and methods. Sociometry Monographs, 20, 3-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthar, Suniya & McMahon, Thomas (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Adolescence, 6, 581-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Herbert & Richards, Gary (1988). The Tennessee self-concept scales: Reliability, internal structure, and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 612-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, Jacob (1934). Who shall survive? NY: Beacon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, Jacob (1943). Sociometry in the classroom. Sociometry, 6, 425-428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, Jacob (Ed.) (1960). The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouton, Jane, Blake, Robert, & Fruchter, Benjamin (1960). The validity of sociometric responses. In J. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 362-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, Andrew & Bukowski, William (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children's peer group status. Developmental Psychology, 19, 856-867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, Andrew, Bukowski, William, & Pattee, Linda (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northway, Mary (1947). A review of the Toronto studies. Sociometry Monographs, 11, 5-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northway, Mary, Frankel, Esther, & Potashin, Reva (Eds.), (1947). Personality and sociometric status. Sociometry Monographs, 11, 5-73.

  • Parkhurst, Jennifer & Asher, Steven (1992). Peer rejection in middle school: Subgroup differences in behavior, loneliness, and interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology, 28, 231-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, Jennifer & Hopmeyer, Andrea (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolscence, 18, 125-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peery, J. Craig (1979). Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected: A reconceptualization of sociometric status in preschool children. Child Development, 50, 1231-1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potashin, Reva (1947). A sociometric study of children's friendships. Sociometry Monographs, 11, 31-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratiner, C., Weissberg, R., & Caplan, M. (1986, August). Ethical considerations in sociometric testing: The reactions of preadolescent subject. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the APA, Washington, DC.

  • Rienks, Shauna (1995). Classroom sociometry and its connection to classroom climate and students' self-concept. Unpublished B.A. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodkin, Philip, Farmer, Thomas, Pearl, Ruth, & Van Acker, Richard (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabongui, Amir, Bukowski, William, & Newcomb, Andrew (1998). The peer ecology of popularity: The network embeddedness of a child's friend predicts the child's subsequent popularity. In W. Bukowski & A. Cillessen (Eds.), Sociometry then and now: Building on six decades of measuring children's experiences with the peer group. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 83-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagiuri, Renato (1960). Perceptual sociometry: Introduction. In J. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 568-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal, Zohar & Babad, Elisha (1990). The teacher's pet phenomenon: Rate of occurrence, correlates, and psychological costs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 637-645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, Rhona & McKown, Clark (1988). Expectancy effects in ‘context’: Listening to the voices of students and teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 7): Expectations in the classroom. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 215-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wherry, Robert & Fryer, Douglas (1949). Buddy ratings: Popularity contest of leadership criteria? Personnel Psychology, 2, 147-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, Ruth (1989). Measures of self-concept. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Educational and Clinical Child Psychology Program, School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, 91905, Israel

    Elisha Babad

Authors
  1. Elisha Babad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Babad, E. On the conception and measurement of popularity: more facts and some straight conclusions. Social Psychology of Education 5, 3–29 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012780232587

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012780232587

Keywords

Search

Navigation