Abstract
A goal of many after-school programs is to provide supervision to youths who might potentially engage in delinquent activities during the afternoon hours. By comparing students who remained in a sample of Maryland after-school programs to students who withdrew prior to the end of the school year, this study provides evidence that after-school programs are serving a lower-risk population than intended. Findings indicate that prior to dropping out of the programs, dropouts scored in the more at-risk direction on 11 out of 12 indicators examined in this study and had significantly more peer drug models and days absent from school than students who stayed in the programs. Census data indicate that dropouts came from neighborhoods characterized by higher levels of social disorganization than students who stayed in the programs. Program attendance is also related to several of the risk-factors examined. The results suggest the need for improved communication with parents and further creativity in program planning as a means of retaining high-risk students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Acosta, D. T., & Holt, B. A. (1991). Give teens the programs they want ... and need. Journal of Extension, 29, 29–30.
Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99, 353–395.
Chaiken, M. (1998a). Children, cops, and communities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Chaiken, M. (1998b). Tailoring established after-school programs to meet urban realities. In D. S. Elliott, B. A. Hamburg, & K.R. Williams, (Eds.), Violence in American schools (pp. 348–375). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coleman, M., Robinson, B. E., Rowland, B. H., & Price, S. (1984). Families with latchkey children: A study with implications for service delivery. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, San Francisco.
Donohew, L., Palmgreen, P., & Lorch, E. P. (1994). Attention, need for sensation, and health communication campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 38,310–322.
Dwyer, K. M., Richardson, J. L., Danley, K. L., Hanson, W. B., Sussman, S. Y., Brannon, B., Dent, C. W., Johnson, C. A., & Flay, B. R. (1990). Characteristics of eighth-grade students who initiate self-care in elementary and junior high school. Pediatrics, 86, 448–454.
Farkas, S., & Johnson, J. (1997). Children these days: What Americans really think about the next generation. Public Agenda [On-line]. Available: http://www.publicagenda.org/ aboutpa/aboutpa3h.htm
Galambos, N. L., & Garbarino, J. (1983). Identifying the missing links in the study of latchkey children. Children Today, 12, 2–4, 40–41.
Gottfredson, G. D. (1991). What About You? Ellicott City, MD: Gottfredson Associates.
Gottfredson, D. C., McNeil, R. J., & Gottfredson, G. D. (1991). Social area influences on delinquency: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28, 197–226.
Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention. (1996). Maryland After School Community Grant Program 1997. Baltimore: Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention.
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Guerney, L. F. (1991). A survey of self-supports and social supports of self-care children. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 25, 234–254.
Long, T. J., & Long, L. (1982). Latchkey children: The child's view of self care. (ERIC ED 211 229).
Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Lorch, E. P., Rogus, M., Helm, D., & Grant, N. (1991). Sensation seeking, message sensation value, and drug use as mediators of PSA effectiveness. Health Communication, 3, 217–227.
President Clinton's State of the Union Address (1998).Washington, DC: Federal News Service.
Richardson, J. L., Dwyer, K., McGuigan, K., Hansen, W. B., Dent, C., Johnson, C. A., Sussman, S. Y., Brannon, B., & Flay, B. (1989). Substance use among eighth-grade students who take care of themselves after school. Pediatrics, 84, 556–566.
Richardson, J. L., Radziszewska, B., Dent, C. W., & Flay, B. R. (1993). Relationship between after-school care of adolescents and substance use, risk taking, depressed mood, and academic achievement. Pediatrics, 92, 32–38.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
Schultz, L. E., Crompton, J. L., & Witt, P. A. (1995). A national profile of the status of public recreation services for at risk children and youth. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 13, 1–25.
Seligson, M. E. (1999). The policy climate for school-age child care. The Future of Children, 9, 135–139.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1990). Census of the Population and Housing. [1990 CensusSummaryTapeFile 3].Available: http:// venus.census.gov/cdrom/lookup
Woods, M. B. (1972). The unsupervised child of the working mother. Developmental Psychology, 6, 14–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weisman, S.A., Gottfredson, D.C. Attrition from After School Programs: Characteristics of Students Who Drop Out. Prev Sci 2, 201–205 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011515024809
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011515024809