Abstract
This study examined a non-school program aimed at enhancing the educational performance of economically disadvantaged early adolescents who live in public housing. The educational enhancement program included discussions with adults, writing activities, leisure reading, homework, helping others, and games using cognitive skills. A three-arm research design juxtaposed program youth who received educational enhancements with comparison youth in affiliated facilities who did not receive the program and with control youth in other community programs without educational enhancements. From youths, follow-up data collected 2 1/2 years after baseline revealed uniformly positive outcomes for program youth on measures of reading, verbal skills, writing, and tutoring. Teacher reports at final follow-up favored program and comparison youth over controls on measures of reading, writing, games, overall school performance, and interest in class material. School grades were higher for program youth than for comparison and control youth for reading, spelling, history, science, and social studies. Overall grade averages were higher for program youth versus comparisons and controls, as was school attendance. Study data lend empirical support to the provision of educational enhancements in non-school settings for at-risk youths.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1994). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Center for Education Reform. (1997). Do Americans want educational reform? Dallas Morning News, October 7, p. 21A.
Chapin Hall Center for Children (1992). Community resources for students: A new look at their role and importance and a preliminary investigation of their distribution across communities. Chicago: Author.
Chimerine, C. B., Panton, K. L. M., & Russo, A. W. W. (1993). The other 91 percent: Strategies to improve the quality of outof-school experiences of Chapter 1 students. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
Comer, J. P. (1988). Educating poor minority children. Scientific American, 259(5), 42–48.
Fung, W., & Wong, N. (1991). Involvement in extracurricular activities as related to academic performance, personality, and peer acceptance. Chinese University Education Journal, 19, 155–160.
Gerber, S. B. (1996). Extracurricular activities and academic achievement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 42–50.
Gordon, K. (1995). Self-concept and motivational patterns of resilient African-American high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 21, 239–255.
Harrell, A. V. (1985). Validation of self-report. In B. A. Rouse, N. J. Kozel, & L. G. Richards (Eds.), Self-report methods as estimating drug use (pp. 12–21). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Kyle, J. (1997). School reform needed in most poor communities. Nation's Cities Weekly, 18(20), 8.
Louis Harris and Associates. (1993). Metropolitan Life survey of the American teacher 1993: Violence in American public schools. New York: Author.
McNamara, J. F., & McNamara, M. (1985). The role of extracurricular activities in education: A chart essay on survey findings. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Denver, November 8, 1985.
Morra, L. G. (1994). School-age children: Poverty and diversity challenge schools nationwide. Testimony before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources and the Subcommittee on Education, Arts, and Humanities, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accounting Office. March 16, 1994.
Peng, S., & Wright, D. (1994). Explanation of academic achievement of Asian American students. Journal of Education Research, 87, 346–352.
Perry, N. (1993). School reform: Big pain, little gain. Fortune, 128, November 29, 130–138.
Posner, J. K., & Vandell, D. L. (1994). Low-income children's after-school care: Are there beneficial effects of after-school programs? Child Development, 65, 440–456.
Utz, R. L. (1986). High school students use of out-of-school time in the U.S. New Education, 8, 35–43.
Wave, Inc. (1991). Summary of the first year of WAVE. Washington, DC: Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schinke, S.P., Cole, K.C. & Poulin, S.R. Enhancing the Educational Achievement of At-Risk Youth. Prev Sci 1, 51–60 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010076000379
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010076000379