Skip to main content
Log in

Representing a stable environment by egocentric updating and invariant representations

  • Published:
Spatial Cognition and Computation

Abstract

To represent a stable environment despite the experience of changes during self movements, one can either develop an invariant allocentric representation, or update the egocentric representations as one moves. Using a disorientation paradigm, three sets of studies investigated these mechanisms in human navigation and scene recognition. Accuracy in the configuration of multiple object localization is impaired by disorientation, an effect not due to artifacts such as memory deterioration over time, intervening physical activities, uncertainty in self position and orientation, etc., suggesting one can locate objects primarily by updating their egocentric positions as she or he moves. Disorientation also impaired the judgment of changes to a scene after viewer movements, suggesting a similar egocentric updating process. On the contrary, representation of the shape of the surroundings is invariant and persists through disorientation. The coexistence of multiple mechanisms may increase the flexibility and robustness of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acredolo, D., Adams, A. and Goodwyn, S.W. (1984). The Role of Self-Produced Move-ment and Visual Tracking in Infant Spatial Orientation, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38: 312–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorim, M.A., Glasauer, S., Corpinot, K. and Berthoz, A. (1997). Updating an Object's Orientation and Location during Non Visual Navigation: A Comparison between Two Processing Modes, Perception & Psychophysics 59: 404–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J.B. and Uzgiris, I.C. (1985). Effect of Self-Initiated Locomotion on Infant Search Activity, Developmental Psychology 21: 923–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I. and Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing Depth-Rotated Objects: Evidence and Conditions for Three-Dimensional Viewpoint Invariance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19: 1162–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, B., Van der Hejiden, A.H.C. and Velichkovsky, B.M. (1994). A Theory of Visual Stability across Saccadic Eye Movements, Behavioral & Brain Sciences 17: 247–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K. (1986). A Purely Geometric Module in the Rat's Spatial Representation, Cognition 23: 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diwadkar, V.A. and McNamara, T.P. (1997). Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition, Psychological Science 8: 302–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, D.L. and Goldberg, M.E. (1992). The Updating of the Representation of Visual Space in Parietal Cortex by Intended Eye Movements, Science 255: 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, R.D. and Sholl M.J. (1995). Object-Array Structure, Frames of Reference, and Retrieval of Spatial Knowledge, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21: 483–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M.J. and Robertson, I.H. (1998). Mental Rotation and the Automatic Updating of Body-Centered Spatial Relationships, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24: 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukusima, S.S., Loomis, J.M. and Da Silva, J.A. (1997). Visual Perception of Egocentric Distance as Assessed by Triangulation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23: 86–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C.R. (1990). The Organization of Learning.Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermer, L. and Spelke, S.S. (1996). Modularity and Development: The Case of Spatial Reorientation, Cognition 61: 195–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J. and Presson C.C. (1979). The Coding and Transformation of Spatial Information, Cognitive Psychology 11: 375–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D.E. (1996). Integrating Information across Saccadic Eye Movements, Current Direc-tions in Psychological Science 5: 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, B., Spelke, E.S. and Gleitman, H. (1984). Spatial Knowledge in a Young Blind Child, Cognition 16: 225–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, M.L. and Mittelstaedt, H. (1980). Homing by Path Integration in a Mammal, Naturwissenschaften 67: 566–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieser, J.J. and Rider, E.A. (1991). Young Children's Spatial Orientation with Respect to Multiple Targets when Walking without Vision, Developmental Psychology 27: 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieser, J.J. (1989). Access to Knowledge of Spatial Structure at Novel Points of Observation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 15: 1157–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, A.L. and McNamara, T.P. (1997). Multiple Views of Spatial Memory, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4: 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D.J. and Wang, R.F. (1998). Perceiving Real-World Viewpoint Changes, Psycholo-gical Science 9: 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, M.J. (1995). Rotating Objects to Recognize Them: A Case Study on the Role of Viewpoint Dependency in the Recognition of Three-Dimensional Objects, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2: 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, M.J. and Pinker, S. (1989). Mental Rotation and Orientation-Dependence in Shape Recognition, Cognitive Psychology 21: 233–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E.C. (1948). Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men, Psychological Review 55: 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S. and Basri, R. (1991). Recognition by Linear-Combinations of Models, IEEE Transactions On Pattern Analysis And Machine Intelligence 13: 992–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, T., Hurlbert, A. and Poggio, T. (1995). View-Based Models of 3D Object Recognition: Invariance to Imaging Transformations, Cerebral Cortex 5: 261–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R. (1999). Spatial Representations of object Locations and Environment Shape. Thesis (Ph.D.), Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Wang, R.F. and Simons, D.J. (1999). Active and Passive Scene Recognition across Views, Cognition 70: 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R.F. and Spelke, E.S. (2000). Updating Egocentric Representations in Human Navigation, Cognition 77: 215–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R.F., Hermer, L. and Spelke, E.S. (1999). Mechanisms of Reorientation and Object Localization by Human Children: A Comparison with Rats, Behavioral Neuroscience 113: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R. and Srinivasan M.V. (1981). Searching Behavior of Desert Ants, Genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera), Journal of comparative Physiology 142: 315–318.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, R.F. Representing a stable environment by egocentric updating and invariant representations. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1, 431–445 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010043814328

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010043814328

Navigation