Skip to main content
Log in

A graded work site intervention program to improve sun protection and skin cancer awareness in outdoor workers in Israel

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: A graded worksite intervention program to improve sun protection and skin cancer awareness of outdoor workers was implemented and evaluated longitudinally over a period of 20 months.

Methods: Outdoor male workers (144/213 recruits) from geographically separated units of the Israel National Water Company were allocated to complete (n = 37), partial (n = 72) or minimal (n = 35) intervention groups. Subsequent to the assignment and training of local safety officers, an educational and medical screening package was provided to the corresponding groups either once, or repeatedly a year later. Personal sun protective gear was provided upon repeated intervention. Outcome measures were evaluated through self-response questionnaires administered prior to the first intervention pulse, and 8 months after the first and second interventions.

Results: A 15–61% improvement in sun-protection habits was noted in the entire study population 8 months after initialization, compared to no sunscreen use, 20% sun-exposed skin area and highest mean occupational exposure dose of 1.68 MED/day at pre-test. An even greater use of sunscreen was evident 1 year later in the complete and partial intervention groups, + 80% and + 52%, respectively. The baseline rate of self-examination of the skin in the same two groups (49%) increased significantly at post-test (+ 71% and + 53%, respectively).

Conclusions: This integrated intervention program led to significantly improved sun protection and skin cancer awareness. Repeated intervention combined with the supply of sun-protective gear contributed to an even greater impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (1996) Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Agency for Research on Cancer, ed. (1992) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, Vol. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holman CD, Gibson IM, Stephenson M, Armstrong BK (1983) Ultraviolet irradiation of human body sites in relation to occupation and outdoor activity: field studies using personal UVR dosimeters. Clin Exp Dermatol 8: 869–871.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong BK, Kricker A (1996) Epidemiology of sun exposure and skin cancer. In: Leigh IM, Newton Bishop JA, Kripke ML, eds. Skin Cancer. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beral V, Robinson N (1981) The relationship of malignant melanoma, basal and squamous cell cancers to indoor and outdoor work. Br J Cancer 44: 886–891.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vagero D, Ringback G, Kiviranta H (1986) Melanoma and other tumors of the skin among office, outdoor and indoor workers in Sweden. Br J Cancer 53: 507–512.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubin N, Moseson M, Pasternack BS (1989) Sun exposure and malignant melanoma among susceptible individuals. Environ Health Perspect 81: 139–151.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Azizi E, Modan M, Fuchs Z, Kushelevsky A (1990) Identification of workers in Israel at increased risk for skin cancer due to occupational over exposure to the sun. Harefuah 118: 508–511.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cristofolin M, Bianchi R, Boi S, et al. (1993) Analysis of the cost-effectiveness ratio of the health campaign for early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in Trentino, Italy. Cancer 71: 370–374.

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization (1994) Summary and conclusions. In: Environmental Health Criteria; 160. Ultraviolet Radiation. Geneva: World Health Organization, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elwood JM, Morris JM (1996) Evaluation of programs to modify sun exposure. In: Mackie RN, ed. Primary and Secondary Prevention of Malignant Melanoma. Basel Karger, pp. 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cummings SR, Tripp MK, Herrmann NB (1997) Approaches to the prevention and control of skin cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 16: 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koh HK, Geller AC (1998) Public health interventions for melanoma. Prevention, early detection, and education. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 12: 903–928.

    Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization (1994) Human Studies: The Skin. In: Environmental Health Criteria; 160 Ultraviolet Radiation. Geneva: World Health Organization, pp. 127–173.

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization (1994) Human Studies: The Eye In: Environmental Health Criteria; 160. Ultraviolet Radiation. Geneva: World Health Organization, pp. 181–207.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fitzpatrick TB (1988) The validity and practicability of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 124: 869–871.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gottlieb A, Bourget TD, Lowe NJ (1990) Sunscreens: effect of amounts of application of sun protection factors. In: Lowe NJ, Shaath NA, eds. Sunscreens: Development, Evaluation and Regulatory Aspects. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 441–446.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Azizi E, Pavlotsky F, Kushelevsky AP, et al. (1994) Estimation of skin cancer risk due to occupational exposure to sunlight in Israel. Final Scientific Report. The Committee for Research and Prevention in Occupational Safety and Health. Jerusalem: Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kudish A, Evseev E, Kushelevsky AP (1997) The analysis of ultraviolet radiation in the Dead Sea basin, Israel. Int J Climatol 17: 1697–1704.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shani E, Rosenberg L, Glesinger R, Sadetzki S, Solomon A, Azizi E (1998) Prevention of skin cancer and actinic eye disease in outdoor workers of “Mekorot”-a longitudinal feasibility study. Final Scientific Report. The Committee for Research and Prevention in Occupational Safety and Health. Jerusalem: Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Girgis A, Sanson RW, Watson A (1994) A workplace intervention for increasing outdoor workers' use of solar protection. Am J Public Health 84: 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Borland RM, Hocking B, Godkin GA, Gibbs AF, Hill DJ (1991) The impact of a skin cancer control education package for outdoor workers. Med J Aust 154: 686–688.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stepanski BM, Mayer JA (1998) Solar protection behaviors among outdoor workers. J Occup Environ Med 40: 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Berwick M, Begg CG, Fine JA, et al. (1996) Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lerman Y, Shemer J (1996) Epidemiologic characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in health-promotion programs. J Occup Environ Med 38: 535–538.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azizi, E., Flint, P., Sadetzki, S. et al. A graded work site intervention program to improve sun protection and skin cancer awareness in outdoor workers in Israel. Cancer Causes Control 11, 513–521 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008970224998

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008970224998

Navigation