Abstract
This experiment investigated metacognitive monitoring in the processing of anaphors in 10–year-old skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Two tasks were used with expository texts. The direct self-evaluation task was carried out with consistent texts in which target anaphors were either repeated noun phrases or pronouns. Subjects had to read and to evaluate their own comprehension on a 6–point scale. After reading, subjects answered multiple-choice questions designed to test the processing of anaphors. In the inconsistency detection task, target anaphors were either repeated noun phrases or inconsistent noun phrases. Subjects had to read and detect inconsistencies. After reading, they answered multiple-choice questions. In both tasks, on-line measures (reading times for units containing target anaphors and for subsequent units, and look-backs) were collected in addition to off-line measures (ratings of comprehension, detection of inconsistencies and response to multiple-choice questions) in order to analyse indicators of implicit and explicit evaluation and revision activities. The results from the two tasks converged: less skilled comprehenders showed deficiencies in monitoring on measures of implicit and explicit evaluation and revision. Patterns of reading times revealed that less skilled comprehenders were sensitive to the difficulties in processing pronouns in the self-evaluation task and also sensitive to the lack of text cohesion in the inconsistency detection task. However, this sensitivity was weak and unable to trigger explicit activities. These results were interpreted in the framework of Karmiloff-Smith's (1986) model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubret, J. (1986). Traitement syntaxique et s´emantique de textes et diff´erences individuelles [Syntactic and semantic processing of texts and individual differences], Revue de Psychologie Appliqu´ee 36: 447–468.
Aubret, J. & Blanchard, S. (1991). L'´evaluation des comp´etences d'un lecteur [The assessment of reading abilities]. IssylesMoulineaux, France: Etablissements d'Applications Psychotechniques.
Aubret, F., Demangeon, M., Larcebeau, S. & PelnardConsidere, J. (1981). R´evision et ´etude de quelques tests [The revision and the study of some tests], Document du service de Recherches de l'INOP 1: 99–107.
Baker, L. (1984). Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency and type of standard, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38: 289–311.
Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader, Educational Psychology Review 1: 3–38.
Baker, L. (1994). Fostering metacognitive development. In H.W. Reese (ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 25 (pp. 201–239). San Diego: Academic Press.
Baker, L. & Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P.D. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr & P. Mosenthal (eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). New York: Longman.
Baker, L. & Zimli, L. (1989). Instructional effects on children's use of two levels of standards for evaluating their comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology 81: 340–346.
Beal, C.R. (1990). The development of text evaluation and revision skills, Child Development 61: 247–258.
Beal, C.R., Garrod, A.C. & Bonitatibus, G.J. (1990). Fostering children's revision skills through training in comprehension monitoring, Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 275–280.
Carr, T.H. (1981). Building theories of reading ability: On the relation between individual differences in cognitive skills and reading comprehension, Cognition 9: 73–114.
Carr, M., Borkowski, J.G. & Maxwell, S.E. (1991).Motivational components of underachievement, Developmental Psychology 27: 108–118.
Carr, T.H., Brown, T.L., Vavrus, L.G. & Evans, M.A. (1990). Cognitive skill maps and cognitive skill profiles: Componential analysis of individual differences in children's reading efficiency. In T.H. Carr & B.A. Levy (eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 1–55). New York: Academic Press.
Claes, M., Dehant, A., Lamy, J. & Gille, A. (1967). Test de lecture California [California reading test]. Bruxelles: Editest.
Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R. & Pazzaglia, F. (1996). Profiles of reading comprehension difficulties: An analysis of single cases. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 113–136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cox, B.E., Shanahan, T. & Sulzby, E. (1990). Good and poor elementary readers' use of cohesion in writing, Reading Research Quarterly 25: 47–64.
DeSoto, J.L. & DeSoto, C.B. (1983). Relationship of reading achievement to verbal processing abilities, Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 116–127.
Ehrlich, M.-F.(1996). Metacognitive monitoring in the processing of anaphoric devices in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. In C. Cornoldi and J. Oakhill (eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 221–249). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ehrlich, M.–F., KurtzCostes, B. & Loridant, C. (1993). Cognitive and motivational determinants of reading comprehension in good and poor readers, Journal of Reading Behavior 25: 365–381.
Ehrlich, M.–F., KurtzCostes, B., R´emond, M. & Loridant, C. (1995). Les diff´erences individuelles dans la compr´ehension de l'´ecrit: facteurs cognitivolinguistiques et motivationnels [Individual differences in reading comprehension: cognitivolinguistic and motivational factors], Cahiers d'acquisition et de pathologie du langage 13: 37–58.
Ehrlich, M.–F. & R´emond M. (1997). Skilled and less skilled comprehenders: French children's processing of anaphoric devices in written texts, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 15: 291–309.
Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Resnick (ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flavell, J.H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In P. Dickson (ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp.35–60). New York: Academic Press.
Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp.21–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood: Ablex.
Garrod, S.C. & Sanford, A.J. (1985). On the realtime character of interpretation during reading, Language and Cognitive Processes 1: 43–59.
Glenberg, A.M. & Epstein,W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 11: 702–718.
Glenberg, A.M. & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension, Memory and Cognition 15: 84–93.
Greene, S.B., McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 18: 266–283.
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 7: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Harris, P.L., Kruithof, A., Meerum Terwogt, M. & Visser, T. (1981). Children's detection and awareness of textual anomaly, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31: 212–230.
Hickmann, M. & Schneider, P. (1993). Children's ability to restore the referential cohesion of stories, First Language 13: 169–202.
INETOP (1981). Test de lecture silencieuse [Silent reading test]. IssylesMoulineaux, France: Etablissements d'Applications Psychotechniques.
KarmiloffSmith, A. (1986). From metaprocesses to conscious access: Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data, Cognition 23: 95–147.
KurtzCostes, B., Ehrlich, M.–F., McCall, R.J. & Loridant, C. (1995). Motivational determinants of reading comprehension: a comparison of French, CaucasianAmerican, and AfricanAmerican Adolescents, Applied Cognitive Psychology 9: 351–364.
Leather, C.V. & Henry, L.A. (1994). Working memory span and phonological awareness tasks as predictors of early reading ability, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 58: 88–111.
Lefavrais, P. (1986). La pipe et le rat [The pipe and the rat]. IssylesMoulineaux, France: Etablissements d'Applications Psychotechniques.
Maki, R.H. & Serra, M. (1992). The basis of test predictions for text material, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16: 609–616.
Markman, E.M. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation, Child Development 48: 986–992.
Markman, E.M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies, Child Development 50: 643–655.
Nelson, T.O. ( 1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling of knowing predictions, Psychological Bulletin 95: 109–133.
Oakhill, J.V. (1994). Individual differences in children's text comprehension. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 821–848). New York: Academic Press.
Oakhill, J. & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less skilled comprehenders: effects of memory load and inferential complexity, Language and Speech 29: 25–37.
Papetti, O., Cornoldi, C., Pettavino, A., Mazzoni, G. & Borkowski, J. (1992). Memory judgments and allocation of study times in good and poor comprehenders, Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities 7: 3–33.
Paris, S.G. & Oka, E.R. (1986). Children's reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review 6: 25–56.
Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C. & Tressoldi, P.E. (1993). Learning to read: Evidence on the distinction between decoding and comprehension skills, European Journal of Psychology of Education 8: 247–258.
Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C.A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849–894). New York: Academic Press.
Saarnio, D.A., Oka, E.R. & Paris, S.G. (1990). Developmental predictors of children's reading comprehension. In T.H. Carr & B.A. Levy (eds.), Reading and its development: A component skills approach (pp.57–79). New York: Academic Press.
Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M.–F., Oakhill, J.V. & Yuill, N.M. (1997, submitted). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension.
Stanovich, K.E., Nathan, R.G. & ValaRossi, M. (1986). Developmental changes in the cognitive correlates of reading ability and the developmental lag hypothesis, Reading Research Quarterly 21: 267–283.
Tyler, L.K. (1983). The development of discourse mapping processes: The online interpretation of anaphoric expressions, Cognition 13: 309–341.
Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J. (1988). Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled comprehenders, British Journal of Psychology 79: 173–186.
Yuill, N. & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zabrucky, K. & Moore, D. (1989). Children's ability to use three standards to evaluate their comprehension of text, Reading Research Quarterly 24: 336–352.
Zabrucky, K. & Ratner, H.H. (1986). Children's comprehension monitoring and recall of inconsistent stories, Child Development 57: 1401–1418.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ehrlich, MF., Remond, M. & Tardieu, H. Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading and Writing 11, 29–63 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007996502372
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007996502372