Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between the GHQ-28 and SF-36 (MH 1–5) for the assessment of the mental health in patients with ischaemic heart disease

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To assess the mental health of patients admitted to hospital with suspected ischaemic heart disease, by means of two instruments, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) and the MH (1–5) dimension of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire, and to compare the psychometric properties of both questionnaires in this population. Methods: A study was conducted of 185 patients consecutively admitted to hospital with suspected ischaemic heart disease, classified into four groups: Acute Myocardial Infarctus (AMI), unstable angina, non-ischaemic cardiologies, and non-cardiological conditions. Their mental health was assessed by means of the GHQ-28 and the MH 1–5 sub-scales of the SF-36; the validity of the results were analysed by the association of each instrument with socio-demographic (age, sex, social class, and educational level) and clinical (co-morbidity, risk factors, diagnostic groups and background to the illness) variables. The correlation of each instrument with other sub-scales of the SF-36 was studied. The internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's α, together with the item-internal consistency and item-discriminant validity. Results: Of the population studied, 71.9% were males and the mean age was 60.2 years (SD: 10.4). The diagnosis for 33.5% was AMI and for 37.8% unstable angina. For all the variables studied, the scores in the two instruments were ordered in the same way, and were significantly worse for females and for the most disadvantaged social class. None of the scales discriminated in respect of the diagnostic group or the presence of comorbidity. However, a linear relationship was observed with risk factors. Cronbach's α was 0.95 for the GHQ-28 and 0.80 for the MH 1–5. Correlations with the other dimensions showed ranges of −0.35 to −0.61 for the GHQ-28 and of 0.26 to 0.61 for the MH 1–5. These were highest for the Vitality and Social Functioning sub-scales in both instruments. Conclusions: The subjective perception of mental health is measured in a similar way by both the MH 1–5 scale of the SF-36 and the GHQ-28. However, since the MH 1–5 questionnaire is shorter, it should be administratively easier to introduce into routine cardiological practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milani RV, Lavie CJ, Cassidy MM. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training programs on depression in patients after major coronary events. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 726–732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith DF, Sterndorff B, Ropcke G, Gustavsen EM, Hansen JK. Prevalence and severity of anxiety, depression and Type A behaviors in angina pectoris. Scand J Psychol 1996; 37: 249–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Musselman DL, Dwight LE, Nemeroff CHB. The relationship of depression to cardiovascular disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55: 580–592.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kubzansky LD, Kawachi I, Spiro A III, Weiss ST, Vokonas PS, Sparrow D. Is worrying bad for your heart? A prospective study of worry and coronary heart disease in the Normative Ageing Study. Circulation 1997; 95: 818–824.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg DP, Rickels K, Downing R, Hesbacher P. A comparison of two psychiatric screening tests. Br J Psych 1976; 129: 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vazquez JL, Ochoteco A, Padierna JA, Antón JA, Arenal A, Peña C. El cuestionario de salud general (GHQ) como instrumento de ``screening'' de patología psiquiátrica en enfermos cardioloógicos. Actas Luso-Esp Neurol Psiquiatr 1982; 10: 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. TheMOS36 item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992; 30: 473–481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (cuestionario de salud SF-36): Un instrumento para medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc) 1995; 104: 771–776.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ayuso-Mateos JL, Lasa L, Vazquez-Barquero JL, Oviedo A, Diez-Manrique JF. Measuring health status in psychiatric community surveys: Internal and external validity of Spanish version of the SF-36. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1999; 99: 26–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ware JE, Gandeck B, IQOLA group. The SF-36 health survey: Development and use in mental health research and the IQOLA project. Int J Mental Health. 1994; 23: 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mcabe JC, Thomas KJ, Brazier JE, Coleman P. Measuring the mental health status of a population: A comparison of the GHQ-12 and the SF-36 (MH1–5). Br J Psychiatry 1996; 169: 517–521.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grupo de Trabajo de la Sociedad Española de Epidemiología. La medición de la clase social en ciencias de la salud. Barcelona: SG editores, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berwick D, Murphy JM, Goldman PA, Ware JE Jr, Barky AJ, Weinstein MC. Performance of five-item mental health screening test. Med Care 1992; 29: 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lobo A, Perez MJ, Artal J. Validity of the scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) in a Spanish population. Psychol Med 1986; 16: 135–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hemingway H, Bchir MB, Nicholson A, Stafford M, Roberts R, Marmot M. The impact of socio-economic status on health functioning as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire: The Whitehall II study. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 1484–1490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: An outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS. BMJ 1993; 306: 1440–1444.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mchorney CA, Ware JE, Rachel LU JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36–item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Test of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Coulehan JL, Schulberg HC, Block MR, Madonia MJ, Rodriguez E. Treating depressed primary care patients improves their physical, mental and social functioning. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 1113–1120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Linzer M, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life in primary care patients with mental disorders. Results from the PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA 1995; 274: 1511–1517.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Penninx BW, Guralnik JM, Mendes CF, et al. Cardiovascular events and mortality in newly and chronically depressed persons >70 years of age. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 988–994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alonso J, Regidor E, Barrio G, Prieto L, Rodriguez C, Fuente de la L. Valores poblacionales de referencia de la versión española del Cuestionario de Salud SF-36. Med Clin (Barc) 1998; 111: 410–416.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barsky AJ. The paradox of health. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 414–418.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dougherty CM, Dewhurst T, Nichol WP, Spertus J. Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac version III. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 569–575.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mchorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36 item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical test of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Failde, I., Ramos, I. & Fernandez-Palacín, F. Comparison between the GHQ-28 and SF-36 (MH 1–5) for the assessment of the mental health in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Eur J Epidemiol 16, 311–316 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007688525023

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007688525023

Navigation