Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Social Ecology of Violent Victimization: Individual and Contextual Effects in the NCVS

  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-level research has shown that individual and community factors are important predictors of the risk for violent victimization. However, previous analyses have drawn different conclusions about the role of any given factor. These differences likely are related to variations in how violence is measured and to the fact that the data are drawn from different locales. The research presented here uses the 1995 National Crime Victimization Survey and tract-level census data to examine (1) how the risk of violence is distributed across persons and places in the United States and (2) whether empirical findings are sensitive to the operationalization of violence. Results show that some individual-level predictors (e.g., gender and race) are sensitive to the operationalization of violence, whereas others (e.g., age and marital status) are not. In addition, the impact of community characteristics on violence depends on central-city residence. In central cities, persons most at risk are in disadvantaged tracts, with lower proportions of immigrants. Outside central cities, the proportion of immigrants in an area increases risk, while community disadvantage has no independent influence. The importance of an empirical foundation for the development of theories of risk is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aldrich, J., and Nelson, F. (1984). Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, R. (1992). Crime Victimization in City, Suburban, and Rural Areas: A National Crime Victimization Survey Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, R., and Saltzman, L. (1995). Violence Against Women: Estimates from the Redesigned Survey. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, D. (1997). Sex Differences in Violent Victimization, 1994, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. (1986). Substantive contributions of victimization surveys.In Tonry, M., and Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 7, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M., and Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L., and Forde, D. (1999). When Push Comes to Shove: A Routine Conflict Approach to Violence. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindermann, C., Lynch, J., and Cantor, D (1997). Effects of the Redesign on Violence Estimates, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehnen, R., and Skogan, W. (1984). The National Crime Survey: Working Papers, Vol. II: Methodological Studies, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. (1990). The significance of aggregates for testing and conceptually linking macro and micro theories. Soc. Psychol. Q. 53: 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, R., and Miethe, T. (1993). Understanding theories of criminal victimization. In Tonry, M., and Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 17, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miethe, T., and McDowall, D. (1993). Contextual effects in models of criminal victimization. Soc. Forces 71: 741–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miethe, T. and Meier, R. (1994). Crime and Its Social Context: Toward an Integrated Theory of Offenders, Victims, and Situations, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, R. M. (1985). Crime and Victimization Data, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rountree, P. W., Land, K., and Miethe, T. (1994). Macro-micro integration in the study of victimization: a hierarchical logistic model analysis across Seattle neighborhoods. Criminology 32: 387–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., and Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: testing social disorganization theory. Am. J. Sociol. 94: 774–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., and Lauritsen, J. L. (1990). Deviant lifestyles, proximity to crime, and the offender-victim link in personal violence. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 27: 110–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., and Wooldredge, J. (1987). Linking the micro-and macro-dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. J. Quant. Criminol. 3: 371–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., and Lauritsen, J. L. (1994). Violent victimization and offending: individual-, situational-, and community-level risk factors. In Understanding and Preventing Violence, Vol. 3, Social Influences, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., and Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277: 918–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp (1997). Stata Statistical Software: Release 5.0, StataCorp, College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, B. (1999). Area-identified national crime victimization survey data: a resource available through the national consortium on violence research. NCOVR Working Paper Series, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauritsen, J.L. The Social Ecology of Violent Victimization: Individual and Contextual Effects in the NCVS. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 17, 3–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007574114380

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007574114380

Navigation