Skip to main content
Log in

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Transrectal Biopsy of the Prostate: A Prospective Randomized Study of the Prophylactic Use of Single Dose Oral Fluoroquinolone Versus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the efficacy of prophylactic use of single dose oral ofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole regimens for transrectal prostate biopsy in 110 men. In the ofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and control groups, urinary infection was found in 2 (4.76%), 3 (6.66%) and 6 (26.08%) patients, respectively. Both of these antibiotic regimens produced a statistically significant reduction in urinary infection (p<0.02, p<0.05).

Our study indicates that single dose fluoroquinolone or trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole prophylaxis seems to be effective, practical and economical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodge, K. K., McNeal, J. E., Terris, K. M., Stamey, T. A.: Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J. Urol., 142, 71 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collins, G. N., Lloyd, S. N., Hehir, M., McKelvie, G. B.: Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies-true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br. J. Urol., 71, 460 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hammerer, P., Huland, H.: Systematic sextant biopsies in 651 patients referred for prostate evaluation. J. Urol., 151, 99 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melekos, M. D.: Efficacy of prophylactic antimicrobial regimens in preventing infectious complications after transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Int. Urol. Nephrol., 22, 257 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor, H. M., Bingham, J. B.: Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. J. Antibio. Chemother., 39, 115 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emmett, J. L., Barber, K. W., Jackman, R. J.: Transrectal biopsy to detect prostatic carcinoma: a review and report of 203 cases. J. Urol., 87, 460 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufman, J. J., Schutz, J. I.: Needle biopsy of the prostate: a re-evaluation. J. Urol., 87, 164 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crawford, E. D., Haynes, A. L., Story, M. V., Borden, T. A.: Prevention of urinary tract infection and sepsis following transrectal prostatic biopsy. J. Urol., 129, 149 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharpe, J. R., Sadlowski, R. W., Finney, R. P., Branch, W. T., Hanna, J. E.: Urinary tract infection after transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate. J. Urol., 127, 255 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fong, W. I., Struthers, N., Honey, R. J., Simbul, M., Boisseau, D. A.: A randomized comparative study of the prophylactic use of trimethoprim—sulfamethoxazole versus netilmycin—metronidazole in transrectal prostatic biopsy. J. Urol., 146, 794 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Atakiler, M. K., Semerciöz, A., Yeni, E., Saydere, A. T.: Oral quinolone prophylaxis in transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Turkish J. Antibio. Chemother., 9(4), 363 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brewster, S. F., Macgowan, A. P., Gingell, J. C.: Antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal prostatic biopsy: a prospective randomized trial of cefuroxime versus piperacillin/tazobactam. Br. J. Urol., 76, 351 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holme, P., Beisland, H. O.: Infections after transrectal prostate biopsy: a double blind randomized study (Abstract). Eur. Urol., 30(Suppl. 2), 54 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ahlgren, G. A. G., Bergdahl, S., Hugosson, J.: Infection after transrectal core biopsies of the prostate — risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis. Br. J. Urol., 77, 851 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aus, G., Hermansson, G. C., Hugosson, J., Pedersen, K. V.: Transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: Complications and acceptance by patients. Br. J. Urol., 71, 457 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cooner, W. H., Mosley, B. R., Rutherford, C. L., Beard, J. H., Ponds, H. S., Terry, W. J. et al.: Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J. Urol., 143, 1146 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ostroff, E. B., Almario, J., Kramer, H.: Transrectal needle method for biopsy of the prostate: review of 90 cases. Am. Surg., 41, 659 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gustafsson, O., Norming, U., Nyman, C., Hstrom, M.: Complications following combined transrectal aspiration and core biopsy of the prostate. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 24, 249 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hodge, K. K., McNeal, J. E., Stamey, T. A.: Ultrasound guided transrectal biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J. Urol., 142, 66 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rietbergen, J. B. W., Kruger, A. E. B., Kranse, R., Schröder, F. H.: Complication of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies of the prostate: Evaluation of complication rates and risk factors within a population-screening program. Urology, 49(6), 875 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isen, K., Küpeli, B., Sinik, Z. et al. Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Transrectal Biopsy of the Prostate: A Prospective Randomized Study of the Prophylactic Use of Single Dose Oral Fluoroquinolone Versus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole. Int Urol Nephrol 31, 491–495 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007115312039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007115312039

Keywords

Navigation