Skip to main content
Log in

Testing a Model of Socially Desirable and Undesirable Gender-Role Attributes

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recently outlined model of gender-role attributes (K. Korabik, 1999; D. R. McCreary & K. Korabik, 1994) incorporates two complimentary notions: (1) that possessing too little agency or communion (i.e., undersocialization) is undesirable and (2) that too much agency or communion unmitigated by the other (i.e., oversocialization) is undesirable. The present study sought to confirm the relationships proposed in this model between desirable agentic and communal characteristics and these undesirable gender-role constructs. A group of mostly Caucasian undergraduates completed measures of socially desirable and undesirable gender-role attributes. Structural equation modelling was used to confirm the proposed gender-role model. Results showed that the socially desirable gender-role trait components were related to the undesirable components in the manner predicted by the differentiated multidimensional gender-role model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aube, J., & Koestner, R. (1992). Gender characteristics and adjustment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 485–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auten, P., Hull, D., & Hull, J. (1985). Sex-role orientation and Type A behavior pattern. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 288–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batlis, N., & Small, A. (1982). Sex roles and Type A behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 315–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 152–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1993). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blascovich, J. C., Major, B., & Katkin, E. S. (1981). Sex-role orientation and Type A behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 600–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. Bohrnstedt & E. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, E. P. (1985) Psychological androgyny. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGregario, E., & Carver, C. S. (1980). Type A behavior pattern, sex role orientation, and psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 286–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, H. L., & Helgeson, V. S. (1998). Distinctions of unmitigated communion from communion: Self-neglect and overinvolvement with others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. C., Turell, S., & Jackson, L. (1983). Desirable and undesirable masculine and feminine traits in relation to students’ dieting tendencies and body image dissatisfaction. Sex Roles, 9, 705–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B. (1976). Measurement of masculine and feminine sex role identities as independent dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1990). The role of masculinity in a prognostic predictor of heart attack severity. Sex Roles, 22, 755–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1993). Implications of agency and communion for patient and spouse adjustment to a first coronary event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 807–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency andcommunionto well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (1998). A theory of unmitigated communion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1981). Apsychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7, 1097–1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holahan, C. K., & Spence, J. T. (1980). Desirable and undesirable masculine and feminine traits in counseling clients and unselected students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 300–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korabik, K. (1999). Sex and gender in the new millennium. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work. (pp. 3–16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., (1987). Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny: Their relations to multiple dimensions of self-concept. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 427–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Byrne, B. M. (1991). Differetiated additive androgyny model: Relations between asculinity, femininity, and multiple dimensions of self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 811–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary, D. R., & Korabik, K. (1994). Examining the relationships between the socially desirable and undesirable aspects of agency and communion. Sex Roles, 31, 637–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nix, J., & Lohr, J. M. (1981). Relationship between sex, sex-role characteristics, and coronaryprone behavior in college students. Psychological Reports, 48, 739–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, R. E., & Bentler, P. M. (1992). Structural equations modeling: A new friend? In F. B. Bryant, J. Edwards, R. S. Tindale, E. J. Posavac, L. Heath, E. Henderson, & Y. Suarez-Balcazar (Eds.), Methodological issues in applied social psychology (pp. 135–158). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, T. E., Frey, D., Gollwitzer, P. M., Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1981). Masculine (instrumental) and feminine (expressive) traits: A comparison between students in the United States andWest Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12, 142–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saragovi, C., Koestner, R., Aube, J., & DiDio, L. (1997). Agency, communion, and well being: xtending Helgeson's (1994) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 593–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher and W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research. (Vol. 13, pp. 1–97) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and ositive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviours. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny:Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. M. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology. Vol. 2: Personality and psychopathology (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S., & Holzmuller, A. (1978). Psychological androgyny and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S., & Holzmuller, A. (1981). Further evidence on androgyny and interpersonal flexibility. Journal for Research in Personality, 15, 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjectives Scale (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517–530

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korabik, K., McCreary, D.R. Testing a Model of Socially Desirable and Undesirable Gender-Role Attributes. Sex Roles 43, 665–685 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007104624752

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007104624752

Keywords

Navigation