Abstract
South Africa's negotiated settlement and its transition to democracy reads like a modern fairy tale. A brief review of South Africa's social indicators serves to temper some of optimism about the country's future. The indicators reflect the society's quality of life which has been shaped by its turbulent history. Political “caste formation”, changing political alliances, the reforms intended to forestall the demise of apartheid, and the race for global competitiveness have left indelible marks on the society's social indicators. A comparison of living conditions in South Africa with those of roughly comparable economies indicates that the country lags behind in securing overall and widespread socio-economic upgrading of the population at large. A review of a cross-section of South African indicators and their trends over time shows that South Africa is still a very deeply divided society with a very large backlog in socio-economic development. There is evidence of breakdown in the society's social cohesion. Popular expectations of future quality of life indicate that the euphoria following on the first democratic elections has been replaced by a sense of realism among all sectors of the population. It is concluded that quality of life as reflected in South Africa's social indicators may get worse before it improves. The challenge will be to avoid new forms of economic “apartheid” which would depress the quality of life of marginal sectors of the population at the expense of the economically privileged.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Central Statistical Service (CSS), Republic of South Africa: 1995; 1996, October Household Survey 1994; 1995, Statistical Release P0317 (Pretoria, South Africa).
de Kock, C., C. Schutte, N. Rhoodie, and D. Ehlers: 1994, 'The legitimacy of the Government of National Unity', Information Update, Ad hoc issue, No. 1, pp. 1–20 (Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa).
Institute for Democracy in South Africa (Idasa): 1996, 'Opinion Poll', 2 (1 September).
NEDCOR: 1996, NEDCOR project on Crime, Violence and Investment (Johannesburg, South Africa).
Ministry in the Office of the President: 1996, Children, Poverty and Disparity Reduction (Pretoria, South Africa).
Republic of South Africa: 1995, National Social Development Report. Report prepared for the World Summit on Social Development, Copenhagen, Denmark (Government Printer, Pretoria).
Møller, V.: 1995. 'Waiting for utopia: Quality of life in the 1990s', Indicator South Africa 13(1), pp. 47–54.
Møller, V.: 1997, 'Quality of life in South Africa: post-apartheid trends', Social Indicators Research (in press).
Mostert, W.P., B.E. Hofmeyr and J.S. Oosthuizen: 1997. Demographie: Handboek vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Student (Demography: Handbook for the South African student) (Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria) (in press).
Schlemmer, L.: 1996, 'New Evidence on Unemployment', South African Institute of Race Relations, Fast Facts 9/96 (September), pp. 2–6.
South African Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR): 1984; 1988; 1989; 1993; 1995; 1996, Race Relations Survey 1987/88; 1988/89; 1992/93; 1994/5; 1995/96 (Johannnesburg, South Africa).
Van den Berg, S.: 1994, Issues in South African social security (Unpublished background paper prepared for the World Bank, Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa).
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): 1996, Human Development Report 1966 (Oxford University Press, New York).
Whiteford, A. and M. McGrath: 1994, Distribution of Income in South Africa (Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa).
World Bank: 1996, World Bank Development Report 1996 (Oxford University Press, New York).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlemmer, L., Møller, V. The Shape of South African Society and its Challenges. Social Indicators Research 41, 15–50 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006888100026
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006888100026