Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Quality of Life

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers quality of life (QOL) to be a global, yet unidimensional, subjective assessment of one's satisfaction with life. This conceptualization is consistent with viewing QOL assessments as resulting from the interaction of multiple causal dimensions, but it is inconsistent with proposals to limit QOL to health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We test the unidimensional yet global conceptualization of QOL using data from coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. The Self-Anchoring Striving Scale (SASS) and four other indicators derived from the literature, all seemed to function as indicators of a single concept (QOL) that was repeatedly drawn upon as the patients determined their responses to these indicators. However, only about half the variance in each indicator was attributable to that common QOL source. Several structural equation models are used to assess whether the superior performance of the Life 3 indicator is an artifact of the repetition of an item within this indicator. The data convincingly indicate that the superior performance is not a memory artifact, and that even the repetition of an identically worded item prodded the patients into drawing yet again upon the same QOL factor that grounded all the other measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Andrews, F. M.: 1991, ‘The stability and change in levels and structure of subjective well-being: USA 1972 and 1988’, Social Indicators Research 25, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M. and S. B. Withey: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality (Platenum Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A.: 1991, Measuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales (Open University Press, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., P. Converse and W. Rodgers: 1976, The Quality of American Life (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, H.: 1965, The Pattern ofHuman Concerns (Rutgers University Press, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, B. J.: 1989, ‘Cancer survivorship: A topic for nursing research’, Oncology Nursing Forum 16(3), pp. 435–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cella, D. and D. Tulsky: 1990, ‘Measuring quality of life today: Methodological aspects’, Oncology 4, pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. G.: 1995, ‘Quality of life, values, and teamwork in Geriatric Care: Do we communicate what we mean?’, The Gerontologist 35(3), pp. 402–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, N.: 1992, ‘The euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide debate: Issues in nursing’, Oncology Nursing Forum 19(7) (Suppl), pp. 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole, P.: 1995, ‘Quality of life: What is it?’, Geriatric Nursing 16(2), pp. 49–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, A.: 1995, ‘Quality of life measurements in the evaluation of treatment: Proposed guidelines’, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 39(3), pp. 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. and A. Feinstein: 1994, ‘A critical appraisal of the quality of quality of-life measurements,’ Journal of the American Medical Association 272(8), pp. 619–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, F.: 1982, ‘The quality of life’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 52, pp. 4520–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, K. L., A. Jalowiec, C. White-Williams, R. Pifarre, J. Kirklin, R. Bourge and M. Costanzo: 1995, ‘Predictors of quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure awaiting transplantation’, Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 14, pp. 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, G.: 1993, ‘Measurement of health-related quality of life in heart failure’, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 22(4) (Suppl A), pp. 185A–191A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt, G.: 1995, ‘A taxonomy of health status instruments’, The Journal of Rheumatology 22(6), pp. 1188–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L.: 1987, Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L.: 1996, LISREL Issues, Debates, and Strategies (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. and D. Sorbom: 1988, LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications (SPSS, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. M. and J. P. Anderson: 1990, ‘The general health policy model: An integrated approach’, in B. Spilker (ed.), Quality of life Assessments in Clinical Trials (Ravin Press, New York), pp. 131–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, M.: 1995, ‘Quality of life research: Rigor or rigor mortis’, Cardiovascular Nursing 31(4), pp. 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L., L. Valenti, J. Knapp, A. Dobson, R. Plotnikoff, N. Higginbotham and R. Heller: 1993, ‘A self-administered quality-of-life questionnaire after acute myocardial infarction’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46(11), pp. 1249–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D. M.: 1995, ‘Quality of life: A critical assessment’, Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 208 (Suppl), pp. 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKennell, A. C. and F. M. Andrews: 1980, ‘Models for cognition and affect in perceptions of well-being’, Social Indicators Research 8, pp. 257–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKennell, A. C. and F. M. Andrews: 1983, ‘Components of perceived life quality’, Journal of Community Psychology 11, pp. 98–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council of Canada: 1987, Guidelines on Research Involving Human Subjects (Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1980, ‘Satisfaction and happiness’, Social Indicators Research 8, pp. 385–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1982, ‘The satisfaction and happiness of some senior citizens in rural Ontario’, Social Indicators Research 11, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1983, ‘Satisfaction and happiness in a rural northern resource community’, Social Indicators Research 13, pp. 224–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1985, ‘Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT)’, Social Indicators Research 16, pp. 347–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1986, ‘An application of multiple discrepancies theory (MDT) to seniors’, Social Indicators Research 18, pp. 349–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1991a, Global Report on Student Well-Being: Volume 1: Life Satisfaction and Happiness (Springer-Verlag, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C.: 1991b, Global Report on Student Well-Being: Volume 2: Family, Friends, Living Partner, and Self-Esteem (Springer-Verlag, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, V. and L. Schlemmer: 1989, ‘South African quality of life: A research note’, Social Indicators Research 21, pp. 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palys, T. S. and B. R. Little: 1980, ‘Social indicators and the quality of life’, Canadian Psychologist 21, pp. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, D. L. and P. Erickson: 1993, Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.: 1995, ‘Quality of life research: Its increasing importance’, Nursing Science Quarterly 8(3), pp. 100–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D.: 1992, ‘Measurement in the service of comparison’, Journal of Palliative Care 8(3), pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, H.: 1992, ‘Quality of life: The final common pathway’, The Journal of Palliative Care 8(3), pp. 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shye, S.: 1989, ‘The systematic life quality model: A basis for urban renewal evaluation’, Social Indicators Research 21, pp. 343–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A.: 1992, ‘Conceptual andmethodologic issues in defining quality of life: State of the art’, Progresses in Cardiovascular Nursing 7, pp. 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, A.: 1995: ‘Quality of life-a measure too far?’, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 54(6), pp. 439–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, I. B. and P. D. Cleary: 1995, ‘Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life’, Journal of the American Medical Association 273(1), pp. 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. J. and A. J. Longman: 1983, ‘Quality of life and persons withmelanoma: A pilot study’, Cancer Nursing 6, 219–225.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckie, T.M., Hayduk, L.A. Measuring Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research 42, 21–39 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006881931793

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006881931793

Keywords

Navigation