Skip to main content
Log in

Single Mothers and Social Support: The Commitment to, and Retreat from, Reciprocity

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on interviews with thirty-nine single mothers living in a rural area, this paper describes the relationships of support between single mothers and those on whom they rely for assistance in daily living, and explores the extent to which these relationships are based on expectations of reciprocity. After a description of the setting and methods, this article is divided into two sections. The first section argues that single mothers hold most tightly to a narrow norm of balanced reciprocity of material goods and services in their relationships with others in similar situations, but that they stretch that norm as they broaden their support networks outward to those they view as being more fortunate than themselves. In the second section, the work involved in maintaining relationships of dependence and mutuality is analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abel, E. K., & Nelson, M. K. (1990). Circles of care: Work and identity in women's lives. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. (1979). Class culture and family organization: The effects of class and race on family structure in urban America. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 10, 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A., & Scott, C. (1994). Mother-headed families and why they have increased. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, B. J. (1995). Centering studies of African American single mothers and their families. In B. J. Dickerson (Ed.), African American single mothers (pp. 1–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiLeonardo, M. (1987). The female world of cards and holidays: Women, families and the work of kinship. Signs, 12, 440–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, B. T., & Williams, B. B. (1992). Race, gender, and poverty in the rural South: African American single mothers. In C. M. Duncan (Ed.), Rural poverty in America (pp. 97–109). NewYork: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dordick, G. A. (1997). Something left to lose: Personal relations and survival among New York's homeless. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London/New York: Tavistock/ Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, E. F. (1939/1966). The Negro family in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R., & Ferguson, F. I. T. (1997). Kinship strategies and self-sufficiency among single mothers by choice: Post modern family ties. Qualitative Sociology, 20, 187–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, R., & Ferguson, F. I. T. (1998). Only one pair of hands: Ways that single mothers stretch work and family resources. Community, Work & Family, 1, 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D., Eggebeen, D. J., & Clogg, C. C. (1993). The structure of intergenerational exchange in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1428–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. P., Hao, L., & Parish, W. L. (1990). Race, kin support and mother headed families. Social Forces, 68, 797–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Women's Policy Research. (1998). State of the states: Vermont. Washington, DC.

  • Kahler, E. (1997). The Vermont job gap study, phase I: Basic needs and a livable wage. Burlington, VT: Peace & Justice Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchel, M. J. (1998). Fourth annual report to the general assembly on Vermont's welfare restructuring project. Waterbury, VT: Agency of Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komter, A. E. (1996). Reciprocity as a principle of exclusion: Gift giving in the Netherlands. Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association, 30, 299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladner, J. A. (1972). Tomorrow's tomorrow: The black woman. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & Eggebeen, D. J. (1992). Child poverty and the changing rural family. Rural Sociology, 57, 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & McLaughlin, D. K. (1995). Changing economic opportunities, family structure, and poverty in rural areas. Rural Sociology, 60, 688–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J., & McCrate, E. (1993). Women and economic development in Vermont: A study for the Governor's Commission on Women. Montpelier, VT: Governor's Commission on the Status of Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1926). Crime and custom in savage society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1954). The gift. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo, H. P. (1980). Black mothers and the extended family support network. In L. Rodgers-Rose (Ed.), The black woman (pp. 67–87). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, D. A. (1994). Rural America in the global economy: Socioeconomic trends. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 10, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P. (1965). The Negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. K. (1990). Negotiating care: The experience of family day care providers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. K., & Smith, J. (1999). Working hard and making do: Surviving in small town America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, R. E. (1984). Divisions of labour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, T. J., & Bergmann, B. R. (1993). A budget based definition of poverty. Journal of Human Resources, 28(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, J. (1985). Between women: Domestics and their employers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, M. (1992). Maid in the U.S.A. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, A. R. (1997). No more kin: Exploring race, class, and gender in family networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone Age economics. Chicago: Aldine Atherton, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E. (1995). Working from the margins: Voices of mothers in poverty. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudarkasa, N. (1981). Reassessing the black family: Dispelling the myths, reaffirming the values. Sisters, 38/39, 22/23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnberg, M. H., & Reding, K. M. (1999). Reclaiming a stress focus: The hassles of rural, poor single mothers. Families in Society, 80(5), 506–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. W. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, M.K. Single Mothers and Social Support: The Commitment to, and Retreat from, Reciprocity. Qualitative Sociology 23, 291–317 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005567910606

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005567910606

Navigation