Skip to main content
Log in

On the Formation of Family Structures

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hitherto, models of family economics focus on explaining theorganization of monogamous and polygynous family patterns. A thirdexisting marriage pattern, polyandrous marriages, has beenneglected. This paper shows that – in contrast to the common view – a polyandrous marriage may be individually rational. I considera game theoretic model of a subsistence economy whose membersmaximize their personal reproductive success. In this model, allthree family formations can appear as equilibrium solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Becker, G.S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81: 813–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1976). Altruism, egoism, and genetic fitness: Economics and sociobiology. Journal of Economic Literature 14: 817–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1991). A treatise on the family (enlarged edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghe, P. van den, and Barash, D.P. (1977). Inclusive fitness and human family structure. American Anthropologist 79: 809–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. (1994). On the economics of polygyny (working paper). University of Michigan, Department of Economics.

  • Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1988). Kipsigis bridewealth payments. In: Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M. and Turke, P. (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior in a Darwinian perspective, pp. 65–82. Cambridge University Press.

  • Boserup, E. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. and Crook, S. (1988). Tibetan polyandry: Problems of adaptation and fitness. In Betzig, L., Borgerhoff Mulder, M. and Turke, P. (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior in a Darwinian perspective, pp. 97–114. Cambridge University Press.

  • Darity Jr., W.A. (1980). The Boserup theory of agricultural growth. Journal of Development Economics 7: 137–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlund, L. (1996). Dear son - expensive daughter: Why do scarce women pay to marry? In: The marriage market: How do you compare? Ph.D. Thesis, Stockholm School of Economics.

  • Edlund, L. and Korn, E. (1998). A theory of prostitution. Dortmund University Discussion Paper 98-21.

  • Goldstein, M. (1974). Tibetan speaking agro-pastoralists of Limi: A cultural ecological overview of high altitude adaptation in the Northwest Himalaya. Objets et Mondes 14: 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M. (1976). Fraternal polyandry and fertility in a high Himalayan valley in Northwest Nepal. Human Ecology 4(3).

  • Goody, J. (1973). Bridewealth and dowry in Africa and Eurasia. In Goody, J. and Tambiah, S. (Eds.), Bridewealth and dowry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard-Shechtman, S. (1993). On the economics of marriage. Westview Press.

  • Hiatt, L.R. (1980). Polyandry in Sri Lanka: A test case for parental investment theory. Man 15: 583–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H.G. (1995). The economics of polygyny in Sub-Saharan Africa: Female productivity and the demand for wives in Cote d'Ivoire. Journal of Political Economy 103: 938–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper, A. (1982). Wives for cattle. London: Routledge, Kegan &; Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, G.P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas. University of Pittsburgh Press.

  • Orians, G.H. (1969). On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. The American Naturalist 103: 589–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K.E., and Paige, J.M. (1981). The politics of reproductive ritual. University of California Press.

  • Peter, Prince of Greece and Denmark (1963). A study of polyandry. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korn, E. On the Formation of Family Structures. Public Choice 105, 357–372 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005198714654

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005198714654

Keywords

Navigation