Abstract
Structural priming reflects a tendency to generalize recently spoken or heard syntactic structures to different utterances. We propose that it is a form of implicit learning. To explore this hypothesis, we developed and tested a connectionist model of language production that incorporated mechanisms previously used to simulate implicit learning. In the model, the mechanism that learned to produce structured sequences of phrases from messages also exhibited structural priming. The ability of the model to account for structural priming depended on representational assumptions about the nature of messages and the relationship between comprehension and production. Modeling experiments showed that comprehension-based representations were important for the model's generalizations in production and that nonatomic message representations allowed a better fit to existing data on structural priming than traditional thematic-role representations.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387
Bock, J. K. (1989). Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition, 31, 163–186
Bock, J. K. (in preparation). Priming production from comprehension: Evidence for a performance grammar.
Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (in press). The persistence of structural priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
Bock, J. K., & Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.
Bock, J. K., Loebell, H., & Morey, R. (1992). From conceptual roles to structural relations: Bridging the syntactic cleft. Psychological Review, 99, 150–171.
Boyland, J. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1998). Evidence that syntactic priming is long-lasting. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (1999, March). Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, New York, NY.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (in press). Syntactic priming in written production: Evidence for rapid decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Chang, F., Bock, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E. (in progress). Mapping structural priming.
Cleeremans, A., & McClelland, J. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 235–253.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 3, 547–619.
Elman, J. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211.
Elman, J. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71–99.
Ferreira, F. (1994). Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 715–736.
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, J. K. (in press). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science.
Gropen, J., Pinker S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R., & Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 65, 2, 203–257.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Huiskamp, P. (1999). Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 129–147.
Hare, M. L., & Goldberg, A. E. (1999) Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. Syntactic Priming: Purely Syntactic?
Jackendoff, R. S. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levelt, W. J. M., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106.
Levin, B., & Hovav, M. R. (1996). Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651.
Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1998). Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 265–282.
Saffran, E. M., & Martin, N. (1997). Effects of structural priming on sentence production in aphasics. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 877–882.
Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 163–196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, F., Dell, G.S., Bock, K. et al. Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production. J Psycholinguist Res 29, 217–230 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005101313330
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005101313330