Skip to main content
Log in

All That Glitters Is Not Gold: Bad Forgiveness in Counseling and Preaching

  • Published:
Pastoral Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 3 R's of Forgiveness model is presented in which forgiveness is seen as a complex therapeutic process involving both situational and personal variables. Forgivers are seen to utilize the cognitive processes of dialectical reasoning and reframing, modulated by the emotional experiences of empathy, guilt, and shame. Personality style and self-esteem significantly influence the process as well. Distinctions are maintained among various kinds of forgiveness. Divine forgiveness, seen as a partial component of a spiritual encounter with one's God, may be a valid experience for people of faith, but is not something that psychologists are equipped to experimentally analyze. Interpersonal and intrapsychic varieties of forgiveness are more accessible to therapists and deserve empirical investigation. Important differences are highlighted between conjunctive forgiveness (where the third “R” in the forgiveness sequence is reconciliation) and disjunctive forgiveness )where the third “R” is release). Pastors are reminded that, depending on the circumstances, “forgiveness” can be either good or bad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berecz, J. M. (1998a). Beyond shame and pain. Lima, OH: CSS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berecz, J. M. (1998b). Sexual styles: A psychologist's guide to understanding your sexual personality. Atlanta, GA: Humanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berecz, J. M. (1999). All the presidents' women: An examination of sexual styles of presidents Truman through Clinton. Atlanta, GA.

  • Berecz, J. M., & Helm, H. (1998). Shame, the underside of Christianity, Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 1998, 17, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bible (1985). The NIV study bible: New International Version.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandsma, J. M. (1982). Forgiveness: A dynamic theological and therapeutic analysis. Pastoral Psychology, 31, 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, B. B. (1985). The will to forgive: A pastoral theological view of forgiving. Journal of Pastoral Care, 39, 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enright, R. D. & North J. (Eds). (1998). Exploring forgiveness. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbons, R. P. (1986). The cognitive and emotive uses of forgiveness in the treatment of anger. Psychotherapy, 23 (4), 629–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, D. (1987). The healing paradox of forgiveness. Psychotherapy, 24 (2), 240–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Development Study Group. (1991). Five points on the construct of forgiveness within psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 28 (3), 493–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A. H. Empathy as dialectic imagination. (1998, August). Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Kaufman, G. (1985). Shame: the power of caring. Rochester, VT: Schenkman Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulies, A. (1989). The empathic imagination. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E. (1997). Marital forgiveness. Marriage and family: A Christian Journal, 1 (1), 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (Eds.).(2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., & Rachal, K. C. (2000). What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, and C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. P. (1989). Shame: The underside of narcissism. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remarque, E. M. (1926). All quiet on the western front. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twain, M. (1982). The adventures of Tom Sawyer. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, Jr. E. L. (Ed.). (1998). Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research & theological perspectives. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berecz, J.M. All That Glitters Is Not Gold: Bad Forgiveness in Counseling and Preaching. Pastoral Psychology 49, 253–275 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004869004377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004869004377

Navigation