Abstract
A 3 R's of Forgiveness model is presented in which forgiveness is seen as a complex therapeutic process involving both situational and personal variables. Forgivers are seen to utilize the cognitive processes of dialectical reasoning and reframing, modulated by the emotional experiences of empathy, guilt, and shame. Personality style and self-esteem significantly influence the process as well. Distinctions are maintained among various kinds of forgiveness. Divine forgiveness, seen as a partial component of a spiritual encounter with one's God, may be a valid experience for people of faith, but is not something that psychologists are equipped to experimentally analyze. Interpersonal and intrapsychic varieties of forgiveness are more accessible to therapists and deserve empirical investigation. Important differences are highlighted between conjunctive forgiveness (where the third “R” in the forgiveness sequence is reconciliation) and disjunctive forgiveness )where the third “R” is release). Pastors are reminded that, depending on the circumstances, “forgiveness” can be either good or bad.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Berecz, J. M. (1998a). Beyond shame and pain. Lima, OH: CSS Publishing.
Berecz, J. M. (1998b). Sexual styles: A psychologist's guide to understanding your sexual personality. Atlanta, GA: Humanics.
Berecz, J. M. (1999). All the presidents' women: An examination of sexual styles of presidents Truman through Clinton. Atlanta, GA.
Berecz, J. M., & Helm, H. (1998). Shame, the underside of Christianity, Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 1998, 17, 5–14.
Bible (1985). The NIV study bible: New International Version.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan
Brandsma, J. M. (1982). Forgiveness: A dynamic theological and therapeutic analysis. Pastoral Psychology, 31, 40–50.
Cunningham, B. B. (1985). The will to forgive: A pastoral theological view of forgiving. Journal of Pastoral Care, 39, 141–149.
Enright, R. D. & North J. (Eds). (1998). Exploring forgiveness. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Fitzgibbons, R. P. (1986). The cognitive and emotive uses of forgiveness in the treatment of anger. Psychotherapy, 23 (4), 629–633.
Hope, D. (1987). The healing paradox of forgiveness. Psychotherapy, 24 (2), 240–244.
Human Development Study Group. (1991). Five points on the construct of forgiveness within psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 28 (3), 493–496.
Jenkins, A. H. Empathy as dialectic imagination. (1998, August). Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
Kaufman, G. (1985). Shame: the power of caring. Rochester, VT: Schenkman Books, Inc.
Margulies, A. (1989). The empathic imagination. New York: Norton.
McCullough, M. E. (1997). Marital forgiveness. Marriage and family: A Christian Journal, 1 (1), 77–93.
McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (Eds.).(2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., & Rachal, K. C. (2000). What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, and C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford.
Morrison, A. P. (1989). Shame: The underside of narcissism. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
Remarque, E. M. (1926). All quiet on the western front. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
Twain, M. (1982). The adventures of Tom Sawyer. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Worthington, Jr. E. L. (Ed.). (1998). Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research & theological perspectives. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berecz, J.M. All That Glitters Is Not Gold: Bad Forgiveness in Counseling and Preaching. Pastoral Psychology 49, 253–275 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004869004377
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004869004377