Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:23:03.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic associations of network isolation and smoking behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

MOLLY COPELAND ,
BRYCE BARTLETT  and
JACOB C. FISHER
MOLLY COPELAND
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Duke University, 276 Soc/Psych Building, 417 Chapel Dr, Durham, NC 27708, USA (e-mails: molly.copeland@duke.edu, bryce.bartlett@duke.edu, jake.fisher@duke.edu)
BRYCE BARTLETT
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Duke University, 276 Soc/Psych Building, 417 Chapel Dr, Durham, NC 27708, USA (e-mails: molly.copeland@duke.edu, bryce.bartlett@duke.edu, jake.fisher@duke.edu)
JACOB C. FISHER
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Duke University, 276 Soc/Psych Building, 417 Chapel Dr, Durham, NC 27708, USA (e-mails: molly.copeland@duke.edu, bryce.bartlett@duke.edu, jake.fisher@duke.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prevailing social network frameworks examine the association between peer ties and behaviors, such as smoking, but the role of social isolates is poorly understood. Some theories predict isolated adolescents are protected from peer influence that increases smoking, while others suggest isolates are more likely to initiate smoking because they lack the social control provided by peer friendships. Building on a growing literature that seeks to explain these contradictions by moving beyond a homogeneous understanding of isolation, we identify the relationship between smoking and three distinct dimensions of isolation: avoided (adolescents who do not receive ties), withdrawn (adolescents who do not send ties), and externally oriented (adolescents who claim close out-of-grade friends). We examine the co-evolutionary effects of these dimensions and cigarette smoking using an autoregressive latent trajectory model with PROSPER Peers, a unique, longitudinal network dataset. These data include students (47% male and 86% white) from rural Iowa and Pennsylvania, ranging successively from grades 6–12 in eight waves of data. We find avoided isolation is associated with decreased subsequent smoking in high school. Smoking increases subsequent avoided and withdrawn isolation, but decreases external orientation.

Keywords

social networkssocial isolationsubstance usesmokingSEMadolescence
Type
Research Article
Information
Network Science , Volume 5 , Special Issue 3: Networks and Health , September 2017 , pp. 257 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, C., Piazza, M., Mekos, D., & Valente, T. (2001). Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29 (1), 22–30.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55 (5), 469–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ball, B., & Newman, M. E. J. (2013). Friendship networks and social status. Network Science, 1 (1), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearman, P. S., & Moody, J. (2004). Suicide and friendships among American adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 94 (1), 89–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). Autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) models a synthesis of two traditions. Sociological Methods & Research, 32 (3), 336–383.Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Cairns, R. B., & Cairns, B. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, H. J., & Smith, R. A. (2013). Members, isolates, and liaisons: Meta-analysis of adolescents' network positions and their smoking behavior. Substance Use & Misuse, 48 (8), 612–622. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0269-8.Google Scholar
Copeland, M., Fisher, J. C., Moody, J., & Feinberg, M. E. (2015). The dimensions of social isolation in adolescence: Implications for substance use. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Cotterell, J. (2007). Social networks in youth & adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Curran, P. J. (2000). A latent curve framework for the study of development trajectories in substance use. In Rose, J. S., Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., & Sherman, S. J. (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions (pp. 1–42). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2003). The use of latent trajectory models in psychopathology research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112 (4), 526–544. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLay, D., Laursen, B., Kiuru, N., Salmela-Aro, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2013). Selecting and retaining friends on the basis of cigarette smoking similarity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23 (3), 464–473. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Capaldi, D. M., Spracklen, K. M., & Li, F. (1995). Peer ecology of male adolescent drug use. Development and Psychopathology, 7 (4), 803–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dishion, T. J., & Owen, L. D. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of friendships and substance use: Bidirectional influence from adolescence to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 38 (4), 480–491. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.480.Google Scholar
Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1993). Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: A social network analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34 (3), 226–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (4), 653–663. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ennett, S. T., Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., Faris, R., Foshee, V. A., Cai, L., & DuRant, R. (2006). The peer context of adolescent substance use: Findings from social network analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16 (2), 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennett, S. T., Faris, R., Hipp, J., Foshee, V. a, Bauman, K. E., Hussong, A., & Cai, L. (2008). Peer smoking, other peer attributes, and adolescent cigarette smoking: A social network analysis. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 9 (2), 88–98. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-008-0087-8.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, K., & Valente, T. W. (2012). Social network influences on adolescent substance use: Disentangling structural equivalence from cohesion. Social Science and Medicine, 74 (12), 1952–1960. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchichal models. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A., & Morris, M. (2009). Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography, 46 (1), 103–125. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0045.Google Scholar
Gould, R. V. (2002). The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107 (5), 1143–1178. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1086/341744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, S. A., & Schaefer, D. R. (2014). With a little help from my friends? Asymmetrical social influence on adolescent smoking initiation and cessation. Journal of Health and Social Behaviorocial Behavior, 55 (2), 126–143. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0022146514532817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall-Lande, J., Eisenberg, M., Christenson, S. L., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2007). Social isolation, psychological health, and protective factors in adolescence. Adolescence, 42 (166), 265–286.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, J. L., Hamlat, E. J., Stange, J. P., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (2014). Pubertal timing and vulnerabilities to depression in early adolescence: Differential pathways to depressive symptoms by sex. Journal of Adolescence, 37 (2), 165–174. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.11.010.Google Scholar
Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84 (2), 1109–1130.Google Scholar
Henry, D. B., & Kobus, K. (2007). Early adolescent social networks and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 27 (3), 346–362. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0272431607302005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. R., Sussman, S., Unger, J. B., & Valente, T. W. (2006). Peer influences on adolescent cigarette smoking: A theoretical review of the literature. Substance Use & Misuse, 41 (1), 103–55. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/10826080500368892.Google Scholar
Kirke, D. M. (2004). Chain reactions in adolescents' cigarette, alcohol and drug use: Similarity through peer influence or the patterning of ties in peer networks? Social Networks, 26 (1), 3–28. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2003.12.001.Google Scholar
Kobus, K. (2003). Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction, 98 (Suppl 1), 37–55.Google Scholar
Kobus, K., & Henry, D. B. (2010). Interplay of network position and peer substance use in early adolescent cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30 (2), 225–245. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609333300.Google Scholar
Kreager, D. A. (2004). Strangers in the halls: Isolation and delinquency in school networks. Social Forces, 83 (1), 351–390.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. L., & Stattin, H. (2000). Leisure activities and adolescent antisocial behavior: The role of structure and social context. Journal of Adolescence, 23 (2), 113–27. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2000.0302.Google Scholar
Maxwell, K. A. (2002). Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31 (4), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, D. A., Moody, J., Diehl, D., Smith, J. A., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). Network ecology and adolescent social structure. American Sociological Review, 79 (6), 1088–1121. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414554001.Google Scholar
Mercken, L., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Vartiainen, E. & de Vries, H. (2010). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Social Networks, 32 (1), 72–81. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.005.Google Scholar
Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Osgood, D. W. (2014). Emergence of mixed-sex friendship groups during adolescence: Developmental associations with substance use and delinquency. Developmental Psychology, 50 (11), 2449–2461. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/a0037856.Google Scholar
Niño, M. D., Cai, T., & Ignatow, G. (2016). Social isolation, drunkenness, and cigarette use among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 53, 94–100. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.10.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osgood, D. W., Feinberg, M. E., Wallace, L. N., & Moody, J. (2014). Friendship group position and substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 39 (5), 923–933.Google Scholar
Poulin, F., & Pedersen, S. (2007). Developmental changes in gender composition of friendship networks in adolescent girls and boys. Developmental Psychology, 43 (6), 1484–1496. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raudenbush, S. W. (2002). Hierarchichal linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Boda, Z., Vörös, A., & Preciado, P. (2016). Manual for SIENA version 4.0. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Statistics; Nuffield College.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., & Mills, R. S. (1988). The many faces of social isolation in childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56 (6), 916–924. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.56.6.916.Google Scholar
Schaefer, D. R., Haas, S. A., & Bishop, N. J. (2012). A dynamic model of us adolescents' smoking and friendship networks. American Journal of Public Health, 102 (6), 12–18. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300705.Google Scholar
Schaefer, D. R., Kornienko, O., & Fox, A. M. (2011). Misery does not love company: Network selection mechanisms and depression homophily. American Sociological Review, 76 (5), 764–785. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411420813.Google Scholar
Skrondal, A. & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2014). Handling initial conditions and endogenous covariates in dynamic/transition models for binary data with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 63 (2), 211–237.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32 (1), 44–60. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.Google Scholar
Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004). PROSPER community-university partnership model for public education systems: Capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention. Prevention Science, 5 (1), 31–39. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013979.52796.8b.Google Scholar
Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Clair, S., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., & Feinberg, M. (2011). Preventing substance misuse through community-university partnerships: Randomized controlled trial outcomes 4 1/2 years past caseline. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40 (4), 440–447. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steglich, C., Snijders, T. A. B., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40 (1), 329–393.Google Scholar
Tani, C. R., Chavez, E. L., & Deffenbacher, J. L. (2001). Peer isolation and drug use among white non-hispanic and Mexican American adolescents. Adolescence, 36 (141), 127–139.Google ScholarPubMed
Urberg, K. A., Luo, Q., Pilgrim, C., & Degirmencioglu, S. M. (2003). A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescent substance use: Individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. Addictive Behaviors, 28 (7), 1243–1256. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00256-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valente, T. W., Unger, J. B., & Johnson, C. A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 37 (4), 323–329. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.10.016.Google Scholar
Van Zalk, M. H. W., Kerr, M., Branje, S. J. T., Stattin, H., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010). It takes three: selection, influence, and de-selection processes of depression in adolescent friendship networks. Developmental Psychology, 46 (4), 927–938. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0019661 Google Scholar
Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., & Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (2), 195–203. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.195.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (2005). Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20 (1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Copeland supplementary material

Supplementary Table

Download Copeland supplementary material(File)
File 51.7 KB