Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:45:19.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Longitudinal Study of Relational Aggression and Victimisation in Early Adolescence: Gender Differences in the Moderating Effects of Social Status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2016

Samantha Ferguson Open the ORCID record for Samantha Ferguson [Opens in a new window] ,
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck  and
Amanda L. Duffy
Samantha Ferguson*
Affiliation:
Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Southport, Queensland, Australia
Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck
Affiliation:
Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Southport, Queensland, Australia
Amanda L. Duffy
Affiliation:
Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Southport, Queensland, Australia
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Samantha Ferguson, School of Applied Psychology, G40 Parklands Drive, Southport QLD 4222, Australia. Email: samantha.ferguson@griffithuni.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

Relational aggression is defined as behaviours intended to harm others by damaging their relationships. Drawing from two theoretical perspectives, the social process model and the peer socialisation model, we tested how relational aggression and victimisation could influence each other over time, and examined peer status and gender as moderators of these bidirectional associations. We hypothesised that aggression would lead to increasing victimisation and victimisation to increasing aggression, and that the association from aggression to later victimisation would be weaker for more popular and preferred youth, especially girls. Participants were 328 Australian early adolescents (172 boys, 156 girls) in Grades 5, 6 or 7, who nominated classmates who were aggressive, victimised, popular, and preferred. Results showed support for the role of status and gender in the bidirectional associations between aggression and victimisation. Relational aggression was associated with more T2 relational victimisation only among adolescents who were low in popularity and among girls with low social preference. Victimisation was associated with T2 aggressive behaviour among more popular girls. Relational victimisation was also associated with less T2 aggression among popular boys. Findings highlight the complexities introduced by gender and social status for the unfolding of early adolescent relational aggression and victimisation.

Keywords

relational aggressionpopularitysocial statusgender
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 7 , 2016 , e8
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P.A., Kless, S.J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169–187. doi:10.2307/2112807 Google Scholar
Arbuckle, J.L. (2012). IBM® SPSS® Amos™ 21 user's guide. Chicago: Amos Development Corporation, IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291.Google Scholar
Atlas, R.S., & Pepler, D.J. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. The Journal of Educational Research. 92, 86–99. doi:10.1080/00220679809597580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, S.L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review. 88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.4.354 Google Scholar
Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Bierman, K.L., Smoot, D.L., & Aumiller, K. (1993). Characteristics of aggressive‐rejected, aggressive (nonrejected), and rejected (nonaggressive) boys. Child Development, 64, 139–151. doi:10.2307/1131442 Google Scholar
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (2000). Social intelligence — empathy = aggression? Aggression and Violent Behavior. 5, 191–200. doi:10.1016/s1359-1789(98)00029-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, J.H. (1983). Differential premises arising from differential socialization of the sexes: Some conjectures. Child Development, 54, 1335–1354. doi:10.2307/1129799 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, M., & Hymel, S. (1997). Peer experiences and social self-perceptions: A sequential model. Developmental Psychology. 33, 135–145. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.135 Google ScholarPubMed
Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Hodges, E.V. (2001). Toward a process view of peer rejection and harassment. In Juvonen, J. & Graham, J. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 265–289). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions. 154, 136–136. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 Google Scholar
Bukowski, W.M., Gauze, C., Hoza, B., & Newcomb, A.F. (1993). Differences and consistency between same-sex and other-sex peer relationships during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29, 255–263. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.255 Google Scholar
Card, N.A., Stucky, B.D., Sawalani, G.M., & Little, T.D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x Google Scholar
Cillessen, A.H., & Marks, P.E. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In Cillessen, A., Schwartz, D., & Mayeux, L. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A.H.N, & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development. 75, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Rose, A.J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J.D., & Dodge, K.A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In Eisenberg, N. & Damon, W. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol 3: Social, emotional and personality development (5th ed., pp. 779–862). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.Google Scholar
Coleman, P.K., & Byrd, C.P. (2003). Interpersonal correlates of peer victimization among young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 301–314. doi:10.1023/A:1023089028374 Google Scholar
Crick, N.R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behaviour in the prediction of children's future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317–2327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14678624.1996.tb01859.x Google Scholar
Crick, N.R., & Bigbee, M.A. (1998). Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: A multiinformant approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 337–347. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.337 Google Scholar
Crick, N.R., Casas, J.F., & Ku, H.C. (1999). Relational and physical forms of peer victimization in preschool. Developmental Psychology, 35, 376–385. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.2.376 Google Scholar
Crick, N.R., & Grotpeter, J.K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710–722. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, N.R., Grotpeter, J.K., & Bigbee, M.A. (2002). Relationally and physically aggressive children's intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations. Child Development, 73, 1134–1142. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00462 Google Scholar
Crick, N.R., Ostrov, J.M., & Werner, N.E. (2006). A longitudinal study of relational aggression, physical aggression, and children's social–psychological adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 127–138. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-9009-4 Google ScholarPubMed
de Bruyn, E.H., Cillessen, A.H.N., & Wissink, I.B. (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 543–566. doi:10.1177/0272431609340517 Google Scholar
French, D.C., Jansen, E.A., & Pidada, S. (2002). United States and Indonesian children's and adolescents’ reports of relational aggression by disliked peers. Child Development, 73, 1143–1150. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00463 Google Scholar
Galen, B.R., & Underwood, M.K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 589. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.589 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaskin, J. (2012). Structural equation modeling (SEM). Gaskination's StatWiki. Retrieved from http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com.Google Scholar
Hawker, D.S., & Boulton, M.J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta‐analytic review of cross‐sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441–455. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00629 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawley, P.H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132. doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0470 Google Scholar
Hawley, P.H., Little, T.D., & Card, N.A. (2007). The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 170–180. doi:10.1177/0165025407074630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J.N., Cavell, T.A., & Willson, V. (2001). Further support for the developmental significance of the quality of the teacher–student relationship. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 289–301. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00074-7 Google Scholar
Henington, C., Hughes, J.N., Cavell, T.A., & Thompson, B. (1999). The role of relational aggression in identifying aggressive boys and girls. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 457–477. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00015-6 Google Scholar
Juvonen, J., Wang, Y., & Espinoza, G. (2013). Physical aggression, spreading of rumors, and social prominence in early adolescence: Reciprocal effects supporting gender similarities? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1801–1810. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9894-0 Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, L.A., Waugh, C.E., Valencia, A., & Webster, G.D. (2002). The functional domain specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 756–767. doi:1037//0022-3514.82. 5.756 Google Scholar
LaFontana, K.M., & Cillessen, A.H. (2002). Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635 Google Scholar
Little, T., Henrich, C., Jones, S., & Hawley, P. (2003). Disentangling the ‘whys’ from the ‘whats’ of aggressive behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 122–133. doi:10.1080/01650250244000128 Google Scholar
Luthar, S.S., & McMahon, T.J. (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. Journal of Research Adolescents, 6, 581–603.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E.E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E.E., & Jacklin, C.N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mathieson, L.C., Murray-Close, D., Crick, N.R., Woods, K.E., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., Geiger, T.C., & Morales, J.R. (2011). Hostile intent attributions and relational aggression: The moderating roles of emotional sensitivity, gender, and victimization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 977–987. doi:10.1007/s10802-011-9515-5 Google Scholar
Nakamoto, J., & Schwartz, D. (2010). Is peer victimization associated with academic achievement? A meta‐analytic review. Social Development, 19, 221–242.Google Scholar
Nangle, D.W., & Foster, S.L. (1992). The effects of a positive behavioral context on the social impact of aggressive behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 543–553. doi:10.1007/BF00911239 Google Scholar
Ostrov, J.M. (2008). Forms of aggression and peer victimization during early childhood: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 311–322. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9179-3 Google Scholar
Ostrov, J.M. (2010). Prospective associations between peer victimization and aggression. Child Development, 81, 1670–1677. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01501.x Google ScholarPubMed
Ostrov, J.M., & Godleski, S.A. (2010). Toward an integrated gender-linked model of aggression subtypes in early and middle childhood. Psychological Review, 117, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrov, J.M., & Godleski, S.A. (2013). Relational aggression, victimization, and adjustment during middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 801–815. doi:10.1017/S0954579413000187 Google Scholar
Paquette, J.A., & Underwood, M.K. (1999). Gender differences in young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 242–266. doi:10.1037/a0018070 9507.2009.00539.x Google Scholar
Parke, R.D., & Slaby, R.G. (1983). The development of aggression. In Hetherington, E.M. (Ed.) & Mussen, P.H. (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol 4: Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 567–641). New York: Wiley Google Scholar
Parkhurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144. doi:10.1177/0272431698018002001 Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A.D., & Long, J.D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280. doi:10.1348/026151002166442 Google Scholar
Phillipsen, L.C., Deptula, D.P., & Cohen, R. (1999). Relating characteristics of children and their friends to relational and overt aggression. Child Study Journal, 29, 269–289. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2000-08715-003 Google Scholar
Prinstein, M.J., & Cillessen, A.H. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310–342. doi:10.1353/mpq.2003.0015 Google Scholar
Pronk, R.E., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. (2010). It's ‘mean,’ but what does it mean to adolescents? Relational aggression described by victims, aggressors, and their peers. Journal of Adolescent Research. 25, 175–204. doi:10.1177/0743558409350504 Google Scholar
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J.H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M.J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34, 244–252. doi:10.1002/ab.20374 Google Scholar
Rose, A.J., Glick, G.C., & Smith, R.L. (2011). Popularity and gender. In Cillessen, A.H.N., Schwartz, D., & Mayeux, L. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 103–122). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Rose, A.J., & Rudolph, K.D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 93–131. doi:10.1037/0033452909.132. 1.98 Google Scholar
Schafer, J.L., & Graham, J.W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147 Google Scholar
Stadler, C., Feifel, J., Rohrmann, S., Vermeiren, R., & Poustka, F. (2010). Peer victimization and mental health problems in adolescents: Are parental and school support protective? Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41, 371–386. doi:10.1007/s10578-010-0174-5 Google Scholar
Sullivan, T.N., Farrell, A.D., & Kliewer, W. (2006). Peer victimization in early adolescence: Association between physical and relational victimization and drug use, aggression, and delinquent behaviors among urban middle school students. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 119–137. doi:10.1017/S095457940606007X Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Underwood, M.K., Galen, B.R., & Paquette, J.A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get along? Social Development, 10, 248–266. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157–176. doi:10.1300/J008v19n02_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volling, B.L., MacKinnon-Lewis, C., Rabiner, D., & Baradaran, L.P. (1993). Children's social competence and sociometric status: Further exploration of aggression, social withdrawal, and peer rejection. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 459–483. doi:10.1017/S0954579400004521 Google Scholar
Weisz, J.R., Chaiyasit, W., Weiss, B., Eastman, K.L., & Jackson, E.W. (1995). A multimethod study of problem behavior among Thai and American children in school: Teacher reports versus direct observations. Child Development, 66, 402–415. doi:10.2307/1131586 Google Scholar
Xie, H., Farmer, T.W., & Cairns, B.D. (2003). Different forms of aggression among inner-city African-American children: Gender, configurations, and school social networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 355–375. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00086-4 Google Scholar
Yeung, R.S., & Leadbeater, B.J. (2007). Does hostile attributional bias for relational provocations mediate the short-term association between relational victimization and aggression in preadolescence? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 973–983. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9162-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., & Duffy, A. (2014). Heightened emotional sensitivity intensifies the concurrent and longitudinal associations between relational aggression and victimization among girls but not boys. Developmental Psychopathology, 26, 661–673. doi:10.1017/S0954579414000303 Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., Geiger, T.C., & Crick, N.R. (2005). Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behavior, and peer relations: Gender moderation and bidirectional associations. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 421–452. doi:10.1177/0272431605279841 Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., Hunter, T.A., & Pronk, R. (2007). A model of behaviors, peer relations and depression: Perceived social acceptance as a mediator and the divergence of perceptions. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 26, 273–302. doi:10.1521/jscp.2007.26.3.273 Google Scholar
Zimmer‐Gembeck, M.J., & Pronk, R.E. (2012). Relation of depression and anxiety to self‐and peer‐reported relational aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 16–30. doi:10.1002/ab.20416 Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., Pronk, R.E., Goodwin, B., Mastro, S., & Crick, N.R. (2013). Connected and isolated victims of relational aggression: Associations with peer group status and differences between girls and boys. Sex Roles, 68, 363–377. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0239-y Google Scholar