Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:15:33.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST): introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Philip J. Corr
Affiliation:
Professor, University of Wales Swansea
Philip J. Corr
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea
Get access

Summary

The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of personality is a theoretical account of the neural and psychological processes underlying the major dimensions of personality. The first section of this introductory chapter traces the development of RST, from its official birth in 1970, through to Gray's highly influential 1982 The Neuropsychology of Anxiety, and on to its major revision in 2000 with the second edition of this book (co-authored with Neil McNaughton) – this section may be read as an overview tutorial of RST. The second section discusses some of the major issues facing future RST research. The third section turns attention to the question of the level of behavioural control exerted by ‘biological’ and ‘cognitive’ processes, and discusses the implications of findings from consciousness studies for conceptualizing the role of these processes in RST.

Past and present

At the time of writing (2006), most empirical studies continue to test the unrevised (pre-2000) version of RST. But, in many crucial respects, the revised (2000) theory is very different, leading to the formulation of new hypotheses, some of which stand in opposition to those generated from the unrevised theory. This reluctance, or slowness, to adopt the new model is, no doubt, motivated as much by unfamiliarity and research inertia as it is by a careful evaluation of the merits of both versions. But there may be a different reason for this state of affairs, and one that may continue to prevail in the RST research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abler, B., Walter, H., Erk, S., Kammerer, H. and Spitzer, M. (2006), Prediction error as a linear function of reward probability is coded in human nucleus accumbens, NeuroImage, 31, 790–795CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ávila, C. (2001), Distinguishing Behavioural Inhibition System–mediated and Behavioural Approach System-mediated disinhibition mechanisms: a comparison of disinhibition models of Gray (1981, 1987) and of Patterson and Newman (1993), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, D. H. (1988), Anxiety and its Disorders (New York: Guilford Press)Google Scholar
Blanchard, R. J. and Blanchard, D. C. (1990), An ethoexperimental analysis of defense, fear and anxiety in McNaughton, N. and Andrews, G. (eds), Anxiety (Dunedin: Otago University Press), pp. 12–133Google Scholar
Blackmore, S. (2003), Consciousness: An Introduction (London: Hodder and Stoughton)Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R., Jones, L., Clark, F. and Smith, M. (1995), Is the psychopath ‘morally insane’?, Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 741–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S. (2004), Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system, Emotion, 41, 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S.(2005), Impulse and constraint: perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 312–333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carver, C. S. and Scheier, M. F. (1998), On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S. and White, T. L. (1994), Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System scales, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. (1995), Facing up to the problem of consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, 200–219Google Scholar
Cloninger, C. R. (1986), A unified biosocial theory of personality and its role in the development of anxiety states, Psychiatric Developments, 3, 167–226Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2001), Testing problems in J. A. Gray's personality theory: a commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999), Personal Individual Differences, 30, 333–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, P. J. (2002a), J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: tests of the joint subsystems hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity, Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, P. J.(2002b), J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory and frustrative nonreward: a theoretical note on expectancies in reactions to rewarding stimuli, Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1247–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, P. J.(2004), Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, P. J.(2005), Social exclusion and the hierarchical defense system: comment on MacDonald and Leary (2005), Psychological Bulletin, 131, 231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, P. J.(2006), Understanding Biological Psychology (Oxford: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Corr, P. J. and Perkins, A. M. (2006), The role of theory in the psychophysiology of personality: from Ivan Pavlov to Jeffrey Gray, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, P. J., Pickering, A. D. and Gray, J. A. (1995a), Personality and reinforcement in associative and instrumental learning, Personal Individual Differences, 19, 47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corr, P. J., Pickering, A. D. & Gray, J. A.(1995b), Sociability/impulsivity and caffeine-induced arousal effects: critical flicker/fusion frequency and procedural learning, Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 713–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859/1968), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. and Krebs, J. R. (1979), Arms races between and within species, Proceeding of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 205, 489–511CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickman, S. J. (1990), Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eilam, D. (2005), Die hard: a blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense: implications for the control of defensive behaviour, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 1181–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman P. (1994), All emotions are basic in Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. (eds), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 15–19Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1957), The Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria (New York: Preger)Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J.(1967), The Biological Basis of Personality (IL: Thomas Springfield)Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J.(1979), The conditioning model of neurosis, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 2, 155–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, M. W. (1985), Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach (New York: Plenum Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. and Levey, A. (1972), Conditioning, introversion–extraversion and the strength of the nervous system in Nebylitsyn, V. D. and Gray, J. A. (eds), Biological Bases of Individual Behaviour (London: Academic Press), pp. 206–220Google Scholar
Eysenck, M. W. (1992), Anxiety: the Cognitive Perspective (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum)Google Scholar
Eysenck, S. B. G., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G. and Allsopp, J. F. (1985), Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults, Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowles, D. C. (2000), Electrodermal hypoactivity and antisocial behaviour: does anxiety mediate the relationship, Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowles, D. C. (2006), Jeffrey Gray's contributions to theories of anxiety, personality, and psychopathology in Canli, T. (ed.), Biology of Personality and Individual Differences (New York: Guilford Press), pp. 7–34Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1970), The psychophysiological basis of introversion–extraversion, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, J. A. (1972a), Learning theory, the conceptual nervous system and personality in Nebylitsyn, V. D. and Gray, J. A. (eds), The Biological Bases of Individual Behaviour (New York: Academic Press), pp. 372–399Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1972b), The psychophysiological nature of introversion-extraversion: a modification of Eysenck's theory in Nebylitsyn, V. D. and , J. A. Gray (eds), The Biological Bases of Individual Behaviour (New York: Academic Press), pp. 182–205Google Scholar
Gray, J. A.(1975), Elements of a Two-Process Theory of Learning (London: Academic Press)Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1976), The behavioural inhibition system: a possible substrate for anxiety in Feldman, M. P. and Broadhurst, A. M. (eds), Theoretical and Experimental Bases of Behaviour Modification (London: Wiley), pp. 3–41Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1981), A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality in Eysenck, H. J. (ed.), A Model for Personality (Berlin: Springer), pp. 246–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. A.(1982), The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-Hippocampal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gray, J. A.(1985), Anxiety and the brain: pigments aren't colour names, Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 38, 299–300Google Scholar
Gray, J. A.(1987), The Psychology of Fear and Stress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1994), Three fundamental emotion systems in Ekman, P. and Davidson, R. J. (eds), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gray, J. A.(2004), Consciousness: Creeping up on the Hard Problem (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., Feldon, J., Rawlins, J. N. P., Hemsley, D. R. and Smith, A. D. (1991), The neuropsychology of schizophrenia, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 1–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. A. and McNaughton, N. (2000), The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-Hippocampal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. and Smith, P. T. (1969), An arousal decision model for partial reinforcement and discrimination learning in Gilbert, R. M. and Sutherland, N. S. (eds), Animal Discrimination Learning (London: Academic Press), pp. 243–272Google Scholar
Gomez, R., Cooper, A. and Gomez, A. (2005), An item response theory analysis of the Carver and White (1994) Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System Scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1093–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasking, P. A. (2006), Reinforcement sensitivity, coping, disordered eating and drinking behaviour in adolescents, Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E. (2003), Anger and the behavioural approach system, Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 995–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1955), Drives and the central nervous system (conceptual nervous system), Psychological Review, 62, 243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1952), A Behavior System (New Haven: Yale University Press)Google Scholar
Jackson, C. J. and Francis, L. J. (2004), Are interactions in Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory proximal or distal in the prediction of religiosity: a test of the joint subsystems hypothesis, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1197–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konorski, J. (1967), Integrative Activity of the Brain (Chicago: Chicago University Press)Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970), Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 91–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, J. E. (1996), The Emotional Brain (New York: Simon and Schuster)Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. E.(2000), Emotion circuits in the brain, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, B. (1985), Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 529–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libet, B.(2003), Timing of conscious experience: reply to the 2002 commentaries on Libet's findings, Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 321–331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, G. and Leary, M. R. (2005), Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain, Psychological Bulletin, 131, 202–223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackintosh, N. J. (1983), Conditioning and Associative Learning (Oxford: Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
MacPhail, E. M. (1998), The Evolution of Consciousness (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, A. (1993), Biases in processing emotional information, The Psychologist, 6, 493–499Google Scholar
McNaughton, N. and Corr, P. J. (2004), A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285–305CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A., Gelenter, E. and Pribram, K. (1960), Plans and the Structure of Behavior (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A. (1995), The Visual Brain in Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Mowrer, H. O. (1960), Learning Theory and Behavior (New York: Wiley)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olds, J. and Milner, P. (1954), Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 419–427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, C. M. and Newman, J. P. (1993), Reflectivity and learning from aversive events: towards a psychological mechanism for the syndromes of disinhibition, Psychological Review, 100, 716–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, I. P. (1927), Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex (Oxford: Oxford University Press, G.V. Anrep (trans. and ed.))Google Scholar
Perkins, A. M. and Corr, P. J. (2006), Reactions to threat and personality: psychometric differentiation of intensity and direction dimensions of human defensive behaviour, Behavioural Brain Research, 169, 21–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, M. L., Williams, L. M., Heining, M., Herba, C. M., Russell, T., Andrew, C., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C. R. and Morgan, M. J. (2004), Differential neural responses to overt and covert presentations of facial expressions of fear and disgust, Neuroimage, 21, 1484–1496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, A. D., Corr, P. J., Gray, J. A. (1999), Interactions and reinforcement sensitivity theory: a theoretical analysis of Rusting and Larsen (1997), Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 357–365Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1997), How the Mind Works (New York: Norton)Google Scholar
Ranter, S. C. (1977), Immobility in invertebrates: what can we learn? Psychological Review, 1, 1–14Google Scholar
Toates, F. (1998), The interaction of cognitive and stimulus-response processes in the control of behaviour, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 22, 59–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toates, F.(2006), A model of the hierarchy of behaviour, cognition, and consciousness, Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 75–118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ungerleider, L. G. and Mishkin, M. (1982), Two cortical vision systems in Ingle, D. J., Goodale, M. A. and Mansfield, R. J. W. (eds), Analysis of Visual Behaviour (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Weiner, N. (1948), Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (New York: John Wiley & Sons)Google Scholar
Zhu, J. (2003), Reclaiming volition: an alternative interpretation of Libet's experiment, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 61–77Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×